- May 2, 2005
- 8,772
- 9,276
Fortunately in the 87th minute he'd fire in a rocket from 30 yds out and steal the win.
“Best player in the world, what a signing”
Fortunately in the 87th minute he'd fire in a rocket from 30 yds out and steal the win.
Oh, we’d need a clause in the loan agreement banning that man bun.
He, with a couple of quality additions would make us genuine title challengers.
Bale
Ndombele
Wan bissaka
Were well on our way to trophies.
And that’s just the transfer fee. Add inn Zaha’s 100k a week and that the actual comparison
£45m would the the total cost of Bale for three years
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...ace-champions-league-priced-off-market-offersZaha is already on £130k per week at Palace. If a CL side bought him for £75M+ he’d be getting a pay rise to £150-200k per week!
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...ace-champions-league-priced-off-market-offers
100 million for Zaha- fuck off
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...ace-champions-league-priced-off-market-offers
100 million for Zaha- fuck off
They’ll sell one of them but not both, I’d imagine. No one would be remotely interested in parting with a 100 million, let alone slightly north above the Mahrez fee for Zaha. And in all fairness he enhances their chances of Premier League revenue for the next 3-4 years so it’s understandable them valuing him at that to keep other clubs at bayJust seen that. I really rate Zaha and he needs to step up but no-one is getting anywhere near that, nor should they. Maybe Utd at a push as they have a 20% sell on/discount.
Mahrez is the barometer for him I'd say, a better player who went for £60m. Even with HG tax it doesn't stack up.
I'd like to say I feel sorry for the lad but I'm not. He's been asking to leave for CL football for 3 years and has signed 2 5 year deals in that time with no CL release clause. Either naive or just plain stupid.
Also says they are adamant Wan-Bisakka won't be sold.
Could get ugly at Selhurst this summer.
Feel sorry for what mad crying out loud. His team will made a ludicrous decision to not insert s clause in his contract. SERVES HIM RIGHT FOR BEING A D**K H**D
Feel sorry for what mad crying out loud. His team will made a ludicrous decision to not insert s clause in his contract. SERVES HIM RIGHT FOR BEING A D**K H**D
Feel sorry for what crying out loud. His team made a ludicrous decision to not insert a clause in his contract. SERVES HIM RIGHT FOR BEING A D**K H**D
His choices have consequences. Just compare him to Hazard, for example. Another game-changing player, critical to his club. Could have been earning twice as much or more over the last two seasons, but purposefully declined a pay raise to run down his contract and get the move he wanted in the prime of his career. Meanwhile, Zaha is apparently not smart enough to realize his agent wanted to make a quick buck in two consecutive contract extensions during two consecutive summer windows. Took terrible advice and now he's in an impossible situation entirely of his own making. Maybe he'll get lucky and Athleti will come calling with some money to spend after Griezmann moves (or Dortmund if they sell Sancho). But even in those scenarios, 100M would be a 2-3X club record fee for both of those clubs.