What's new

Arsenal

Tucker

Shitehawk
Jul 15, 2013
35,535
166,071
Surely handing Liverpool the advantage made it a must win for both? The draw could cost both sides.
I don’t think Liverpool are as strong as either team. They have a two point advantage, I think that’s doable, three points would have been much worse.

I still think Liverpool win it, and while they have the easier run in, I can still see them dropping points.
 

cliff jones

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
4,946
9,007
I hate them lot down the road, but it’s going to be hard for them not to win things in the next year or two.

Klopp going, City losing Gunda and peak KDB, Walker, them buying an elite striker, the demons are aligning.

Fkin hope we add quality in the summer, otherwise we’ll be minding the gap again
 

ghjk_91

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
901
2,939
Arsenal fans lauding Arteta as some kind of tactical genius for sticking 10 men behind the ball. Peak Allardyce or Dyche.
 

bubble07

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2004
25,070
35,184
The scum have learnt from their previous mistakes

Don't match city and play like a small team and counter
 

bubble07

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2004
25,070
35,184
The scum have learnt from their previous mistakes

Don't match city and play like a small team and counter

And that is a worry as lego head is showing he can adapt his philosophy for certain situations. We have to admit they are becoming a well run club
 

E17yid

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2013
20,107
41,394
I may be clutching here but I’m hoping that if they fail to win it this year then they could slide a bit. They kind of remind me of us under Poch and I’m hoping they suffer a similar slide as we did after that CL final. Not really based on anything other than a feeling/hope but normally managers don’t last longer than 5 years or so at one club and you just get that vibe that if they fuck it this year the best years under Arteta could’ve already been and gone.
 

Tucker

Shitehawk
Jul 15, 2013
35,535
166,071
And that is a worry as lego head is showing he can adapt his philosophy for certain situations. We have to admit they are becoming a well run club
They’re playing well and spending what it takes to attract top talent again. But they are still the cringiest bunch of ****s on the face of the earth.

Better Smeg than Red.
 

BehindEnemyLines

Twisting a Melon with the Rev. Black Grape
Apr 13, 2006
5,311
16,167
Gary Nevillehas been going on all week that if Arsenal want to win the title they should go to City and win.
Not rely on someone else to beat them. Instead they went disguised as Crystal Palace and got a point.
Not surprised Richy is Brazil centre forward , Jesus is no centre forward.
City had one of their regular back 4 and kpr . Never get a better chance.
i hope Harry is revved up for the CL games because it is only he who can win it for Bayern, they are shite.
If there was one day when you might expect Jesus to rise from the dead! :cautious: :shifty:
 

whitechina

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2012
4,548
9,898
And that is a worry as lego head is showing he can adapt his philosophy for certain situations. We have to admit they are becoming a well run club
Go to the bathroom and wash your mouth out with soap!
There maybe something to what you say- but it's dirty- get to the bathroom now, off you go!
 

Westmorlandspur

Well-Known Member
Feb 1, 2013
4,617
7,726
Neville is wrong though. It was more important for both teams not to lose.

Advantage is with Liverpool now and I think their run in looks easiest, but anything can happen in this league.
Put it the other way, if the game had been at Arsenal , City would have played as they always do.
Arsenal played a back 6, Mourinho tactics. If teams attack City they give up chances , especially without Walker who is vital with his pace. If they win the title they will say it was justified.
Wonder what our reaction would be if we were in their position, went to city, took them on and got stuffed 4-2. I hope we can be in that position one day. Rest assured Ange wouldn’t play a back 6, would he?
 

Westmorlandspur

Well-Known Member
Feb 1, 2013
4,617
7,726
I'm relaxed a little to be honest.

I think on some occasions you can just avoid defeats against your rivals and beat all the others.

Problem is City and Liverpool have both got the majority of their trickier games out the way.

Arsenal have us and United away. They'll fancy themselves but if they don't win both that means they really can't drop points elsewhere.
City have their trickiest game to come at our stadium. We all know the league results we’ve had v them. Cup doesn’t count as it’s a different competition.
 

Hazelton

Unknown Member
Jul 11, 2011
8,829
32,010
They're having their peak Pochettino Spurs era at the moment, very good and well drilled but not quite good enough and requiring one or two next level players. Their team is good as a unit but they don't have any real proven world class attacking players, they need a Hazard, Salah, De Bruyne type player or this is as good as they get.

I still maintain that if they were to win the league this season then on paper it's one of the weakest Premier League winning lineups ever.
 

philll

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
12,643
43,670
It's all so contrived and weird. I don't know why he can't just be substituted like a normal player, it's like he has to be escorted by physios every time and there's this totally transparent "will he or won't he" leading up to the following match and, surprise surprise, yes, he will, every time.
 

jurgen

Busy ****
Jul 5, 2008
7,369
20,741
It's all so contrived and weird. I don't know why he can't just be substituted like a normal player, it's like he has to be escorted by physios every time and there's this totally transparent "will he or won't he" leading up to the following match and, surprise surprise, yes, he will, every time.
Would genuinely not surprise me if they do it to drive social media engagement
 

luRRka

Well-Known Member
Jul 27, 2008
4,443
19,660
It's all so contrived and weird. I don't know why he can't just be substituted like a normal player, it's like he has to be escorted by physios every time and there's this totally transparent "will he or won't he" leading up to the following match and, surprise surprise, yes, he will, every time.
He's missed something silly like 3 single games through injury since he started in the men's team. He's missed more for England.

They don't really get injuries to their key players too often, certainly not to the extent of literally every other team in the league
 

Danny1

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2006
6,377
22,080
He's missed something silly like 3 single games through injury since he started in the men's team. He's missed more for England.

They don't really get injuries to their key players too often, certainly not to the extent of literally every other team in the league

Agree with this. What significant players have Arsenal really lost to injury. Of their top players this is the list (who has played/been available what of their 29 games):

29 - Rice, Saliba, Gabriel & Raya/Ramsdale.
28 - White, Saka & Havertz
27 - Odegaard.
26 - Martinelli.
23 - Zinchenko
20 - Jesus

That's 9 of their first team line up have been available pretty much the entire season. Even Havertz only missed the game due to suspension. Yes they have a few injured or unavailable but to have 9 in total for almost the entire season is crazy.

Compare that to us this season:

29 - Vicario
27 - Kulusevski & Johnson
26 - Porro & Son
25 - Sarr
24 - Romero & Udogie
21 - Bissouma
19 - VDV & Maddison.

Arsenal missed games in total amounts to 23, ours is 52. I've only chosen the supposed first teams as if you start adding in Timber for Arsenal, or Bentancur/Solomon for us it distorts it a lot. I would also say that the 2 players at the bottom of the list for Arsenal are their least important whereas VDV & Maddison being absent for as long as they were impacted us massively.
 
Top