What's new

Let's All Laugh At... Let's all laugh at Chelsea thread

DJS

A hoonter must hoont
Dec 9, 2006
31,271
21,767
It’s Chelsea, I wouldnt be surprised if they win either or both of the cups they’re still in running for.

It’s just the way they are, no matter how shit they’ve been to still finish the season with a trophy.
 

chas vs dave

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2008
5,417
21,971
It’s Chelsea, I wouldnt be surprised if they win either or both of the cups they’re still in running for.

It’s just the way they are, no matter how shit they’ve been to still finish the season with a trophy.
Not sure, I think they will be found wanting when they come up against Liverpool, or city.
 

Stoof

THERE IS A PIGEON IN MY BANK ACCOUNT
Staff
Jun 5, 2004
32,221
64,290

EQP

EQP
Sep 1, 2013
8,001
29,793

Marty

Audere est farce
Mar 10, 2005
40,189
63,954
Aparantly they think they will be OK if they sell lukaku broja colwell and galagher
It's a shame that one of the biggest consequences of FFP and amortisation rules is that selling off your homegrown academy players is better for business than keeping them even if they're good enough to be regulars for you.

But Chelsea will have a big problem if other clubs simply choose to not buy these players. Their rivals will be looking at this and (hopefully) thinking they won't bail them out like they did last summer. There's nothing to gain from playing nice here.
 

soup

On the straightened arrow
May 26, 2004
3,498
3,608
Will the potential sale of homegrown players affect their squad quotas? Meaning they'd be paying even more of a premium to replace them? Or do they have the numbers to make it up already? Forgive my ignorance on the matter.
 

Marty

Audere est farce
Mar 10, 2005
40,189
63,954
Will the potential sale of homegrown players affect their squad quotas? Meaning they'd be paying even more of a premium to replace them? Or do they have the numbers to make it up already? Forgive my ignorance on the matter.
Yes there is of course that incentive to have some club trained players over 21 so you can register a full squad. But UEFA rules are stricter than PL rules there and they have enough English trained players that they probably won't fall foul of PL rules. They might well not have a full 25 man squad in UEFA competitions should they reach one of them though, but then we've also not had that for at least one of our European seasons.
 

tommo84

Proud to be loud
Aug 15, 2005
6,199
11,235
Ornstein has said to NBC:

“The confidence inside Chelsea is high that they will remain compliant with FFP.”

What fucking calculator are they using?!

I suspect that this is a Chelsea briefing designed to avoid the scenario people have outline before where clubs decline to buy their unwanted players as they don’t wish to ‘save’ Chelsea. They may be ok but only if they make considerable sales of HG or fully amortised players, and for that to happen at or above market value they need buying parties to think Chelsea have some leverage in the deal.
 

Trix

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2004
19,511
330,451
Aparantly they think they will be OK if they sell lukaku broja colwell and galagher
They tried to sell them in January. Don't see how it will be any different in the first couple of weeks of the Summer window unless the price tags drop significantly, and not just because they'll have less time on their contracts. It'll need to be a fire sale imo.
 

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,320
83,582
Lukaku is on around £325k a week with 2 years left on his contract this summer. I can't see them getting a much better deal than finding a club to take him on a free.
 

vegassd

The ghost of Johnny Cash
Aug 5, 2006
3,360
3,340
It's a shame that one of the biggest consequences of FFP and amortisation rules is that selling off your homegrown academy players is better for business than keeping them even if they're good enough to be regulars for you.
Whilst that is true, it is also true that having academy players make the grade is still the cheapest way to build a squad. The Chelsea situation isn't entirely unique... I think it's just extreme and is throwing more light on the rules than should be normal.

Selling your best academy players is a way to solve a short term problem, but creates longer term problems. Once teams find their groove within the financial rules, there won't be as many short term problems that need solving by an academy sale. Theoretically anyway.

That is predicated on the rules being applied equally and fairly. If the rules get bent because Chelsea have dug such a large financial hole for themselves then it could end up being a bit more "wild west" in terms of flogging academy talents to patch the holes left by £100m players being amortised.
 

Tucker

Shitehawk
Jul 15, 2013
31,358
146,932
Lukaku is on around £325k a week with 2 years left on his contract this summer. I can't see them getting a much better deal than finding a club to take him on a free.
Lukaku will be off to Saudi I reckon. He’s already making positive noises about it.
 
Top