- Jul 23, 2013
- 3,611
- 12,552
Our deadline probably coincides with deadlines we were given from other clubs on various targets we have.
Yep, i wouldn't be surprised if this transfer is already done but will be delayed until the deadline day. So we can buy players. Like Atalanta during Romero's transferI can see a scenario where we have an agreement in place with City for the last day of the window. Allowing us to not lose negotiating leverage with clubs of players we want to bring in whilst still taking advantage of the end of the window desperation (aka Levy time) of selling clubs that means we get the best possible deals.
Kane in the meantime works through standard pre season fitness building but doesn't play.
Very droll arguments lolDharmesh and Kaveh clash over Kane!
Sky Sports News reporters Kaveh Solhekol and Dharmesh Sheth have a heated debate on The Transfer Show over Harry Kanes future at Tottenham.www.skysports.com
These guys are such jokes. I have genuinely never seen a transfer story they "broke" actually come to fruition.Dharmesh and Kaveh clash over Kane!
Sky Sports News reporters Kaveh Solhekol and Dharmesh Sheth have a heated debate on The Transfer Show over Harry Kanes future at Tottenham.www.skysports.com
Anyone clued up on the Webster ruling and if there is any chance of Kane using that to get out of his contract?
Not really into it, but can say for sure that there is no chance that that will happen.Anyone clued up on the Webster ruling and if there is any chance of Kane using that to get out of his contract?
OK, how about this one: what if re-invest and win the league…will it looks good then?Although it’s unlikely, imagine if we sold Kane to City and they end up finishing 4th and we are just 2-4 points behind. Would we have seen it as good business then? No one expected Liverpool to have such a bad season last season but these things can happen.
watch us get Bamford lol
Anyone clued up on the Webster ruling and if there is any chance of Kane using that to get out of his contract?
OK, how about this one: what if re-invest and win the league…will it looks good then?
My point being: we can all throw meaningless hypotheticals around to try and prove our own point, but it ultimately comes down to your own personal judgement as to whether we’ll be better off selling for a good fee, or keeping him, against his will and not having the cash to reinvest
Likelihood is that if we sold him, I’m the short term it would hurt us. But we should be thinking long term.
FP has a long term vision - why else would everyone we’re looking at be basically young or with plenty of room to improve and/or resell?
I agree with that approach.
With that in mind, if we can get the right fee and strengthen the squad, do it
No, we don't want Jesus.This has Jesus on loan written all over
Berbatov/Frazier Campbell all over again
The guy on the left is one of those 'I shout louder, I win the argument' types.
What a load of nonsense. Doesnt understand how things work and has just made himself look like a tit on live tv.
Thought the other guy handle himself quite well.
Anyone clued up on the Webster ruling and if there is any chance of Kane using that to get out of his contract?
We’ve been over it a few times, there’s basically 0 chance, it’s a legal minefield and his agent looks like he struggles with his seat belt. It’s not a goer