What's new

Player Watch: Pierre-Emile Højbjerg

Klinsmannic

Well-Known Member
Jun 22, 2011
787
2,430
Conte absolutely loves Brozovic and apparently, he wants to go out from inter milan if they sell Brozovic ..

Yup. He also didn't want Eriksen apparently lol, and doesn't know what to do with him in his system. Another Marotta buy. Not super healthy at Inter right now...
 

BringBack_leGin

Well-Known Member
Jul 28, 2004
27,719
54,929
To be fair though, through the period since Dembele's peak and the transition to Sissoko we've gone from finishing 2nd on 86 points, to 6th on 59 points. We've massively declined in CM. Winks, Sissoko and Lo Celso is a massive decline from Vic, Mousa and Eriksen. I too like Sissoko's work ethic, but he's just not of the required standard if we want to get back to challenging at the top.

I really would like to NDombele succeed as he's so skilled. I love that kind of player. But when we were linked with Brozkovic today, even though he'll soon be 28, I couldn't help but think how god damn hard we'd be to beat with him and PEH playing behind Lo Celso.

Agree with that final paragraph. Much as I’d like to see NDombele succeed as he’s the type of player you pay to watch, a Brozovic - Hojbjerg axis would return us to the type of great all round partnership we had in 16/17. Two very well rounded players who offer great strength, energy and aggression but also are more than comfortable enough on the ball, with Brozovic offering a bit more passing and invention while Hojbjerg offers a bit more tackling and power. Then Lo Celso will have more freedom to knit our play together and link defence to the attackers.
 

spurs mental

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2007
25,504
50,316
Agree with that final paragraph. Much as I’d like to see NDombele succeed as he’s the type of player you pay to watch, a Brozovic - Hojbjerg axis would return us to the type of great all round partnership we had in 16/17. Two very well rounded players who offer great strength, energy and aggression but also are more than comfortable enough on the ball, with Brozovic offering a bit more passing and invention while Hojbjerg offers a bit more tackling and power. Then Lo Celso will have more freedom to knit our play together and link defence to the attackers.
I'm sold.
 

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
Agree with that final paragraph. Much as I’d like to see NDombele succeed as he’s the type of player you pay to watch, a Brozovic - Hojbjerg axis would return us to the type of great all round partnership we had in 16/17. Two very well rounded players who offer great strength, energy and aggression but also are more than comfortable enough on the ball, with Brozovic offering a bit more passing and invention while Hojbjerg offers a bit more tackling and power. Then Lo Celso will have more freedom to knit our play together and link defence to the attackers.

I think one of our problems in 16/17 which didn't allow us to get over the line was that teams knew we had only one creative outlet in Eriksen and that he wasn't able to drop deeper to get more space as he wasn't inclined to get involved in the physical battle defensively when needed. I feel like the signing of both Lo Celso/Ndombele was a direct response to that and if we go back to the double defensive axis we'll only have that one creative outlet again.
 

emiley heskey

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2020
1,121
1,832
I think one of our problems in 16/17 which didn't allow us to get over the line was that teams knew we had only one creative outlet in Eriksen and that he wasn't able to drop deeper to get more space as he wasn't inclined to get involved in the physical battle defensively when needed. I feel like the signing of both Lo Celso/Ndombele was a direct response to that and if we go back to the double defensive axis we'll only have that one creative outlet again.

Ndombele needs to show all round ability on the pitch like Lo Celso does if we want to play both of them together in front of Hojberg. I just think in big match, Hojberg-Brozovic partnership would give us edge ...

I just think having someone like Brozovic in the squad instead of Sissoko wouls give better balance to the squad.
 

TEESSIDE1

Married, new job and Spurs on the up!
Jul 3, 2006
15,248
19,062
Not sure that we can carry the can for Edwards or onomah. They got loans, they didn’t show the maturity or promise their potential had suggested.

KWP, we should have got a loan at least a season ago.

Onomah is ‘currently’ playing really well for Fulham but pre lockdown he was constantly getting criticised for being poor and looking disinterested. He’s a very hot and cold type of player.

Edwards was always classed as having a poor attitude in both training and his previous loans. He’s doing well in Portugal but he’s playing at a sub level of football. You see a lot of trickery from him and he’s scoring quite a few goals but the standard of defending and goalkeeping is horrific.
 

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
Ndombele needs to show all round ability on the pitch like Lo Celso does if we want to play both of them together in front of Hojberg. I just think in big match, Hojberg-Brozovic partnership would give us edge ...

Don't get me wrong I can see the advantage of signing Brozovic and that type of midfield but I'd rather give Ndombele the opportunity to succeed with us and knowing the creativity that he and Lo Celso together would give us. Add to that the steel which Lo Celso provides and I think it has the potential to be a more well rounded midfield than we had previously where before we had an over-reliance on Eriksen.

If we signed Brozovic and didn't have to lose Ndombele then that'd be incredible and allow us to do both but I know that's not happening.
 

emiley heskey

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2020
1,121
1,832
Don't get me wrong I can see the advantage of signing Brozovic and that type of midfield but I'd rather give Ndombele the opportunity to succeed with us and knowing the creativity that he and Lo Celso together would give us. Add to that the steel which Lo Celso provides and I think it has the potential to be a more well rounded midfield than we had previously where before we had an over-reliance on Eriksen.

If we signed Brozovic and didn't have to lose Ndombele then that'd be incredible and allow us to do both but I know that's not happening.

I just want us to shift sissoko and replace him with better all round footballer with physicality
 

mr ashley

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
3,154
8,561
Onomah is ‘currently’ playing really well for Fulham but pre lockdown he was constantly getting criticised for being poor and looking disinterested. He’s a very hot and cold type of player.

Edwards was always classed as having a poor attitude in both training and his previous loans. He’s doing well in Portugal but he’s playing at a sub level of football. You see a lot of trickery from him and he’s scoring quite a few goals but the standard of defending and goalkeeping is horrific.
Exactly. If they were tearing it up at another PL club, for example, I think we should rightly take some flak for that.
 

BringBack_leGin

Well-Known Member
Jul 28, 2004
27,719
54,929
I think one of our problems in 16/17 which didn't allow us to get over the line was that teams knew we had only one creative outlet in Eriksen and that he wasn't able to drop deeper to get more space as he wasn't inclined to get involved in the physical battle defensively when needed. I feel like the signing of both Lo Celso/Ndombele was a direct response to that and if we go back to the double defensive axis we'll only have that one creative outlet again.
Yes and no. Bear in mind that during 16/17 we also primarily played with a three man defence of Vertonghen Alderweireld and Dier, which meant that we often had just Eriksen, Kane and Dele in front of the pivot.

Son started 24 league matches, many of these were the during the 10 that Kane missed, so no change to formation, and many were during the 14 that Dembele didn’t start, meaning we reverted to a 4231 but with a Wanyama - Dier axis which is totally devoid of impetus going forward. The only really exception to this was towards the end of the season when we started putting Eriksen at CM with Wanyama while Dembele was injured, which was great fun but we already had too much ground to make up,

Then you also need to consider that both Brozovic and Hojbjerg are quicker ball moves than Dembele and Wanyama, but we’d also likely be able to play just one of them with Lo Celso and have Dele/ Lamela in that link role (or another striker should we purchase one) in such event that teams would play to stifle us.

As I said, I’d far prefer Ndombele made a success of himself, but for a squad balance perspective, both Brozovic and Hojbjerg would allow us to play them together behind Lo Celso or play one with him for games where we need to attack. It’d essentially be Brozovic, Hojbjerg, Lo Celso, Winks, Dele and Sissoko competing for 3 positions ranging from most defensive to most attacking depending on opposition.

Obviously I’d far prefer Ndombele in there rather than Sissoko, but for the sake of this discussion the interchangeables are Ndombele and Brozovic. Unless Levy can somehow convince Inter that they’re better off with the less talented, older french international.
 

matthew.absurdum

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
3,734
10,126
Finally a proper DM since Wanyama. I can't help thinking about Sherwood: "I like attacking players to attack, defenders to defend & midfielders to do a bit of both.". No Tim, it is not.
 

joey55

Well-Known Member
May 20, 2005
9,694
3,200
Don't get me wrong I can see the advantage of signing Brozovic and that type of midfield but I'd rather give Ndombele the opportunity to succeed with us and knowing the creativity that he and Lo Celso together would give us.



But Brozovic and Tanguy have very similar creativity stats, with Brozovic just edging it. Brozovic's chance creation stats are very high for a CM player who doesn't take set pieces. This season he's got 6 assists from CM, and a couple of years ago he got 9. To do that without being the set piece taker is rare. No one in the Prem has stats like that from CM. Ashley Westwood also got 6, but he takes the set pieces. Basically, if we want creativity from a deeper role, it will be hard to find better than Brozovic.
 

matthew.absurdum

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
3,734
10,126
But Brozovic and Tanguy have very similar creativity stats, with Brozovic just edging it. Brozovic's chance creation stats are very high for a CM player who doesn't take set pieces. This season he's got 6 assists from CM, and a couple of years ago he got 9. To do that without being the set piece taker is rare. No one in the Prem has stats like that from CM. Ashley Westwood also got 6, but he takes the set pieces. Basically, if we want creativity from a deeper role, it will be hard to find better than Brozovic.

How did Croatian train their midfielder? So many world class playmakers :unsure:
 

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
But Brozovic and Tanguy have very similar creativity stats, with Brozovic just edging it. Brozovic's chance creation stats are very high for a CM player who doesn't take set pieces. This season he's got 6 assists from CM, and a couple of years ago he got 9. To do that without being the set piece taker is rare. No one in the Prem has stats like that from CM. Ashley Westwood also got 6, but he takes the set pieces. Basically, if we want creativity from a deeper role, it will be hard to find better than Brozovic.

That's good to know about Brozovic and as I say I'm not against him, you could argue the touted deal of Skriniar/Brozovic for Ndombele/Sissoko would provided us an excellent spine. However As you say Brozovic and Tanguy have similar stats and considering Tanguy is still settling in I'd like to see him try and fulfil his talent. Admittedly I do think the aforementioned does make more logical sense especially with the man who is currently in charge.
 

Japhet

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2010
19,300
57,715
I think one of our problems in 16/17 which didn't allow us to get over the line was that teams knew we had only one creative outlet in Eriksen and that he wasn't able to drop deeper to get more space as he wasn't inclined to get involved in the physical battle defensively when needed. I feel like the signing of both Lo Celso/Ndombele was a direct response to that and if we go back to the double defensive axis we'll only have that one creative outlet again.

IMO, if you put 2 creative players in a CM3 you create way more than twice the problems for your opponents. A lot of our opponents knew that if they could stop Eriksen they could stop us, but it's a whole different ball game trying to contain 2 players like GLC and Ndombele. It's how City play at their best with deBruyne and Silva, or Barca did with Xavi and Iniesta. You might stifle one of them but not both.
 
Top