What's new

The Mauricio Pochettino thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

bat-chain

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2009
2,232
9,478
I understand the emotion behind wanting the change and indeed on Saturday I was furious with the tactics and team selection but on reflection I’m more unhappy with the players.

Look at Watford's 11 then look at ours, Pochettino couldn’t really feel he was sending out an inferior team because he wasn’t. We'd all take our group in a 5-3-2 over theirs.

Why doesn’t Sissoko track the goal scorer for instance he just stops , or Rose or Vertonghen do more to stop the cross, I struggle to see how Pochettino could anticipate their performance levels.

I agree he needs to change things, those things being in my opinion the players.
 

glacierSpurs

Well-Known Member
Sep 28, 2013
16,163
25,473
I think I read somewhere recently, though open to correction if I'm wrong, that a lot of manager contracts nowadays have a clause stating that termination payouts are only 6 months wages. A brief google search shows that in at least a couple of instances, clubs have inserted termination clauses significantly lower than the remaining length of contract might be- this article says that Keegan had a £2m clause at Newcastle and Moyes a single year's wages at Utd, although both are obviously a bit out of date:

I'd be amazed if Poch's contract didn't have some form of termination clause simply because of how often managers get sacked- I would expect they all have some reduced-compensation clause nowadays.
.
Agree. I don't think Levy, or any other chairmen, will be held hostage that way. If not managers can just be a jerk and trying to get sacked on purpose. It just doesn't make sense.
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,684
104,964
For some reason I just don’t feel Levy is ready to pull the trigger yet. Yes it’s bad and has been for ages but it doesn’t feel like he’s going to be sacked. Not like it did will the last few managers anyway. Another month of no wins will have to push the chairman into action though.

I think he should be gone but it just doesn’t feel like it’s got toxic enough at games for it to actually happen.
 

scat1620

L'espion mal fait
May 11, 2008
16,378
52,851
giphy.gif
 

spids

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2015
6,647
27,841
For some reason I just don’t feel Levy is ready to pull the trigger yet. Yes it’s bad and has been for ages but it doesn’t feel like he’s going to be sacked. Not like it did will the last few managers anyway. Another month of no wins will have to push the chairman into action though.

I think he should be gone but it just doesn’t feel like it’s got toxic enough at games for it to actually happen.

I hope Levy has sat down with Poch and asked him to explain:
  1. What he thinks has gone wrong.
  2. How it can be fixed using a 3 point plan:
    1. Emergency - fixes to get us to January in reach of the top 4.
    2. Tactical - January window to sign a player for a critical position to get us top 4.
    3. Strategic - purchases for next summer to win us the league.
If Poch doesn't have the right answers, particularly to the first question, then he should be moved on.

Answer 1: For me the squad is stale and a combination of no specialist DCM and having three or four senior players wanting out has affected the whole team.
Answer 2a, Emergency - Freeze out contract rebels, promote youth (Foyth, Skipp, Sess, KWP, Parrott), get energy back in the team.
Answer 2b: Tactical - Buy a proper DCM to replace Dier and Wanyama.
Answer 2c: Strategic: Buy a new #1 keeper, Buy young, aggressive, athletic FBs (e.g. Chilwell and a.n.other) to give us width and energy, buy an experienced leader at CB (28 years old is ideal), buy a creative World Class forward to give us new impetus (e.g. Dybala). [Levy has to be realistic that this is the minimum it will take to enable us to win something and will cost £200M+ which could be offset by sales of players we are willing to sacrifice!]
 
Last edited:

yiddopaul

Well-Known Member
Dec 28, 2005
3,452
6,738
I understand the emotion behind wanting the change and indeed on Saturday I was furious with the tactics and team selection but on reflection I’m more unhappy with the players.

Look at Watford's 11 then look at ours, Pochettino couldn’t really feel he was sending out an inferior team because he wasn’t. We'd all take our group in a 5-3-2 over theirs.

Why doesn’t Sissoko track the goal scorer for instance he just stops , or Rose or Vertonghen do more to stop the cross, I struggle to see how Pochettino could anticipate their performance levels.

I agree he needs to change things, those things being in my opinion the players.
It almost feels like the antics of the want-away players are very Chelsea-esque. (minimum effort, to get what they want)
 

JUSTINSIGNAL

Well-Known Member
Jul 10, 2008
16,014
48,648
Would like to see us play some exciting, interesting, on the front football, again.

So would everyone but it’s gonna be difficult while the team is lacking confidence and the home atmosphere is toxic. Just need to scrape a couple of wins to get back on track.
 

Shadydan

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
38,247
104,143
As I thought you have no basis for your argument, as you were.

It's already been responded to mate, verdict is that's it's nonsense, look:

Pretty pointless comparison really though.

Firstly, just over 100m of your assessment was spent this window just gone. Then there are the transfers we made prior to Klopp coming in which is another 107m.

If you want to do a real comparison look at the backing both have had since Klopp was appointed (October 2015). That makes it Klopp 392.38m spent, Poch 184.5m spent.

Now take into account the quality of player. They have spent more than 30m on a player seven times, three of which were in excess of 50m. Meanwhile only Sissoko and Sanchez cost us more than 30m.

We have bought 11 players in the same time that they have bought 12 but for half the money. The average cost of a Spurs player from that time period is 16.77m, for Liverpool it's 32.69m.

Simply put, Klopp has been backed from the moment he stepped through the door, Poch has had to work with vastly inferior players. Would you rather one Salah or a GKN and Janssen?? Allisson or Sissoko and Aurier??

You are right that our recruitment is piss poor, but Klopp has had vastly superior players to work with since he came in. Our only decent window came in Summer 2015 when we got Alderweireld and Son, two first XI players. Since then, only Wanyama has made a real mark on the first team with Sanchez, Moura, Aurier and Sissoko looking better as squad options.
 

JUSTINSIGNAL

Well-Known Member
Jul 10, 2008
16,014
48,648
Are you seriously blaming the fans?

Not blaming anyone just stating facts. It’s difficult to play free flowing attacking football when every bad pass or miscontrol is greeted with a sigh or moan. The team are gonna be tentative. Yes it’s the teams responsibility to turn that atmosphere around but it’s gonna take a couple scrappy wins before we get close to what we all want to see.
 

nailsy

SC Supporter
Jul 24, 2005
30,536
46,630
you are 100% correct. I also think this is telling.

When we beat Liverpool 4-1 at Wembley a couple of years ago this was their team and subs:

Liverpool (4-3-3) Mignolet; Gomez, Matip, Lovren, Moreno; Milner, Henderson, Can; Salah, Firmino, Coutinho.

From their starting X1 that day to their game against Man Utd this weekend the changes were: Alison, Matip, VVD, Robertson, Mane, Wijnaldum, Fabinho....with AA from bench to starter and Origi for the injured Salah. They also have Keita on the bench

Substitutes: Karius, Klavan, Alexander-Arnold, Oxlade-Chamberlain, Grujic, Solanke, Sturridge.

From that day to our last match against Watford we have lost Trippier from the starting X1 and Nkoudou and Fernando from the bench.
We have added Moura (started), Foyth and Ndombele

Tottenham Hotspur (3-3-2-2)
Lloris; Alderweireld, Sanchez, Vertonghen; Trippier, Winks, Aurier; Eriksen, Alli; Son, Kane.
Substitutes: Davies, Rose, Dier, Nkoudou, Sissoko, Llorente.

The BsoL conveniently gloss over that.

We had a better team than them though. They needed to make massive changes to their side to try and reach our level and overtake us. We needed a few players here and there to improve. Wether we got them or not is a different story. City beat Liverpool 5-0 in the same year and they've only released three players from their squad that day.

We've also added Lo Celso and Sessegnon, but they haven't been fully integrated yet for various reasons.

And this BSODL stuff is really BS. People can appreciate what he's done without having to be team Poch or team Levy.
 

Mr Pink

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2010
55,143
100,283
Not blaming anyone just stating facts. It’s difficult to play free flowing attacking football when every bad pass or miscontrol is greeted with a sigh or moan. The team are gonna be tentative. Yes it’s the teams responsibility to turn that atmosphere around but it’s gonna take a couple scrappy wins before we get close to what we all want to see.

Fair enough but I think you're massively underestimating the extent of the problems if you think a couple of scrapy wins are going to change everything long term.

We've been playing poorly, pretty much, since last January time.

The only way I see this improving under Poch is he stays and plays the younger ones and rebuilds in the next two windows. In other words this season is written off and next season is transitional.

I just don't think most will be prepared to wait that long to find out.

As it stands this main group of players isn't playing for him and a few scrapy wins won't fix our current predicament.
 

anydange

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2013
3,656
7,620
Not blaming anyone just stating facts. It’s difficult to play free flowing attacking football when every bad pass or miscontrol is greeted with a sigh or moan. The team are gonna be tentative. Yes it’s the teams responsibility to turn that atmosphere around but it’s gonna take a couple scrappy wins before we get close to what we all want to see.

If I get told to do my job better at work as a result of my peers noticing my lack of effort I would. There's barely any consequences for the modern footballer now. Only a fraction of them have any loyalty or actually care about what fans are saying.
 
Last edited:

theShiznit

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2004
17,900
23,960
If Poch is going to be staying then the players need to be told this in no uncertain terms, and basically be told back him or you will be the ones out the door not the other way around.

Because if some are just thinking about going through the motions until a new man comes in then these are the ones we need out of the club* however big they (think they) are.

*And that's irrespective of what manager/coach is in charge.
 

theShiznit

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2004
17,900
23,960
If I get told to do my job better at work I do it as a result of my peers noticing my lack of effort I would. There's barely any consequences for the modern footballer now. Only a fraction of them have any loyalty or actually care about what fans are saying.
Have you never seen someone at work get flustered or make mistakes when someone is applying pressure on them or standing over their shoulder watching them work?

Now magnify that by 30 thousand, throw in some boos, and groans when they don't do something really good, and then if they do something bad add a sprinkling of abuse on top.

It becomes very hard to do even the simple things let alone tricks, flicks, through balls and bits of flair.

Some players maybe able to play or even thrive under that pressure, but they are in the minority. And even if they do play well it almost always drives a wedge between the players and fans.
 

theShiznit

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2004
17,900
23,960
That's Chelsea under Mourinho and Man Utd under.........erm................yes, Mourinho.
That's pretty much how Chelsea got rid of their last 4/5 managers, and I'm sure the main reason why Lampard was happy to get Sideshow bob out of the club as he appeared to be a ring leader.
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
41,966
71,383
That's pretty much how Chelsea got rid of their last 4/5 managers, and I'm sure the main reason why Lampard was happy to get Sideshow bob out of the club as he appeared to be a ring leader.
Yeah. You cant really blame Mourinho for Chelsea. That squad gives a manager 1-2 years then fucks him off. Or in Sarri’s case, 3 months.
 
Last edited:

Mr Pink

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2010
55,143
100,283
Have you never seen someone at work get flustered or make mistakes when someone is applying pressure on them or standing over their shoulder watching them work?

Now magnify that by 30 thousand, throw in some boos, and groans when they don't do something really good, and then if they do something bad add a sprinkling of abuse on top.

It becomes very hard to do even the simple things let alone tricks, flicks, through balls and bits of flair.

Some players maybe able to play or even thrive under that pressure, but they are in the minority. And even if they do play well it almost always drives a wedge between the players and fans.

That's not the issue though.

Most fans can live with a lack of quality and flare, but what's not acceptable is a lack of effort, or not giving their all.

It's plain to see this is not just about a lack of confidence, it's about doing the fundamentals properly.

A lot them arn't putting in the hard yards, playing for one another... They're coasting, and that shouldn't be allowed to continue.

The point is it has been allowed to continue, inexplicably, and now more and more are questioning Poch for allowing it to continue.

I dont even care about results at the moment, I want to see some proper effort collectively.

That will take care of results anyway but it's not happening. Even after recent humiliations when a reaction should of been an absolute prerequisite it still didn't happen!

I think that's why so many are now starting to comprehend the reality of the situation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top