RIP @NNspurthey will be dealt with.
You raise an interesting point (indirectly). We hear quite a lot about our state of the art training facilities. I wonder whether some clubs, especially over stocked clubs, will see that as an opportunity for their young players to be trained in a high class facility??
I'm certainly on board with your logic of bringing in a midfielder on loan this month if Pochettino doesn't feel that Dembele/Capoue/Stambouli are up to the job of filling in for Bentaleb and Mason. (Albeit I should say that if that IS the case I want the person who signed Stambouli sacked forthwith: what's the point in spending £5m on a midfielder in his mid-20s if we don't think he's good enough to step up when we need reinforcements?) But unless Rabiot is hot shit indeed then I'm skeptical as to whether a 19 year old who's never played in England before and has less than 50 senior appearances under his belt will be the short-term sticking plaster that a January-to-May loan is aiming for. I'd much prefer a more experienced player to come in if short-term cover for Mason/Bentaleb is what we're aiming for [and as I've already mentioned, what on earth were we playing at if Stambouli isn't that player?]; surely if we had designs on signing Rabiot it would be for the longer term, and a loan this month seems to be at odds with that approach.
Makes no sense at all to me, but then again, this is Tottenham we are talking about here...!
The fact that I did it accidentally then you go and call me a chump is pretty annoying.I'm not thrilled with the news about Rabiot myself (based on us taking him on loan rather than a permanent deal - just don't see how us loaning a youngster from another club makes any kind of sense), but it's a total douchebag move for @marcolombardSA to rate the info in [Update 23] with a Dislike rating. Chump chumpety chump chump chump.
I'm certainly on board with your logic of bringing in a midfielder on loan this month if Pochettino doesn't feel that Dembele/Capoue/Stambouli are up to the job of filling in for Bentaleb and Mason. (Albeit I should say that if that IS the case I want the person who signed Stambouli sacked forthwith: what's the point in spending £5m on a midfielder in his mid-20s if we don't think he's good enough to step up when we need reinforcements?) But unless Rabiot is hot shit indeed then I'm skeptical as to whether a 19 year old who's never played in England before and has less than 50 senior appearances under his belt will be the short-term sticking plaster that a January-to-May loan is aiming for. I'd much prefer a more experienced player to come in if short-term cover for Mason/Bentaleb is what we're aiming for [and as I've already mentioned, what on earth were we playing at if Stambouli isn't that player?]; surely if we had designs on signing Rabiot it would be for the longer term, and a loan this month seems to be at odds with that approach.
Makes no sense at all to me, but then again, this is Tottenham we are talking about here...!
Don't worry we've all accidentally given a neg rep whilst scrolling down on our phonesThe fact that I did it accidentally then you go and call me a chump is pretty annoying.
The Goat: "A player from Tomsk? A shop selling fine foods?"
Alright you Brits, what is this? I procure my "fine foods" from Walmart.
Put your running shoes and tracksuit on.Lazy guess would be Marks & Spencer - M & S.
Morgan Schneiderlin?
The Goat: "A player from Tomsk? A shop selling fine foods?"
Alright you Brits, what is this? I procure my "fine foods" from Walmart.
Or one of the Wombles ...Just looked it up and Tomsk is a city in Siberia.
Just looked it up and Tomsk is a city in Siberia.