- Jan 27, 2011
- 2,034
- 4,801
Is there a 'deluded' rating?I'll grasp at some straws and say thay xx translates as x2 therefore agreeing to both statements.
*awaits optimistic ratings*
Is there a 'deluded' rating?I'll grasp at some straws and say thay xx translates as x2 therefore agreeing to both statements.
*awaits optimistic ratings*
You really can't compare transfer fees from different years with different teams - there's a numerous factors involved in transfers (age, agents, fitness, obviously quality of player) but the most important two are how much the bidding club values him at and how much the selling club is willing to lose him for.
I can't think we value a second string keeper at five million pounds and Swansea probably wouldn't sell for that much either.
Maybe he will, who knows. It's a risk.
The point I'm getting Vorm at 30 for £5m, we're buying at a point where he will only depreciate.
I'm all for risking a write down on a Parker, or a VDV, who made huge impacts.
But we can't justify that kind of write off, for a Goalkeeper who won't play.
With our revenues and ambitions, and the competition we're up against - it's just not viable.
Not when Arsenal buy Ospina at 25 for £3m - and have double our budget.
Can Baldini, Broomfield, and Poch, not come up with 1 better solution between then?
What Absolute Bobbins
Because none of those clubs are anticipating that somewhere, sometime somebody Is gonna make em an offer they cant refuse for their no 1, maybe not this season but its likely to happen at somepoint....So lets hear you opinion?
£5m is more than the following RICHER clubs have spent on their 2nd GK:
Man City, Arsenal, Chelsea, United, Liverpool, Real Madrid, Bayern Munich, Juventus, PSG, Monaco, and AC Milan.
So why is this is a sensible move?
Where has the 5m figure come from?
So lets hear your opinion?
£5m is more than the following RICHER clubs have spent on their 2nd GK:
Man City, Arsenal, Chelsea, United, Liverpool, Real Madrid, Bayern Munich, Juventus, PSG, Monaco, and AC Milan.
So why is this is a sensible move?
Because none of those clubs are anticipating that somewhere, sometime somebody Is gonna make em an offer they cant refuse for their no 1, maybe not this season but its likely to happen at somepoint....
My opinion is the same as the other 99.99% of users on here who know the club desperately need a new solid number 2 keeper who can be relied upon should Lloris get injured. £5m for a keeper who can most likely still perform at the highest level for the next 5-6 years is nothing.
Good point. Simon Jones piece in the Mail.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...-Michael-Vorm-Gylfi-Sigurdsson-going-way.html
May not be true or accurate.
The debate I joined was whether it's good value.
Have you considered the possibility that signing a goalkeeper like Vorm, who would be first choice for many teams, is not just about bringing in a backup but also about creating competition for Lloris. If we sign a bog standard back up like Cerny or Pletikosa they will not have the style or natural ability to give Lloris fair competition. Even if he doesnt get many games it will keep Lloris focused on his form which having Brad as a number 2 may not have done.
Furthermore, if we are in the unfortunate position of having to sell Lloris next summer then we will have a very good goalkeeper waiting in the wings ready to replace him where a youth prospect like Archer would just not be ready.
£5 million insurance policy and extra incentive to keep Lloris on top form? Not having to have Lloris travel to far flung teams in Europe and still maintain a good quality keeper that could be the difference between 5-6 points in the league? Not being stung in the market for a keeper because Lloris leaves next summer and we are left without any keepers?
£5 million is a snip in my book
Because none of those clubs are anticipating that somewhere, sometime somebody Is gonna make em an offer they cant refuse for their no 1, maybe not this season but its likely to happen at somepoint....
OK Mr. Price, Waterhouse or Cooper, please enlighten us about the current state of Spurs finances.Best argument I've heard.
It's an expensive motivational tool.
Maybe if we had a lot more money, or needed less surgery elsewhere in the team I could agree.
It's called securing your future.Yeah ok, but why would tie up money solving a problem we don't yet have - ie replacing Lloris.
When we've bigger problems to solve right now?
CB, LWF, St (,LB) etc
Because the potential suitors arent gonna wait till Its right for us. We have a lot of cover elsewhere (whether you think its adequate or not is immaterial - there is talent in the wings for most of those positions except LB and even then im seeing some potential in fryers). But GK is a position of risk at moment. if say PSG flash their cash tomorrow we would be screwed.Yeah ok, but why would tie up money solving a problem we don't yet have - ie replacing Lloris.
When we've bigger problems to solve right now?
CB, LWF, St (,LB) etc
So lets hear your opinion?
£5m is more than the following RICHER clubs have spent on their 2nd GK:
Man City, Arsenal, Chelsea, United, Liverpool, Real Madrid, Bayern Munich, Juventus, PSG, Monaco, and AC Milan.
So why is this is a sensible move?
Is there a 'deluded' rating?