- Nov 29, 2004
- 36,269
- 115,398
It's worth it for shit like this
There’s no info on whether it will be immediate or not. Have to assume a loan-back as that’s what St Etienne have been pushing for all along.Almost too funny and too good to be true.
So did I get this right, Arse's deal opted for a loan-back but we are pushing for a direct transfer?
Apparently, but no one really knows apart from Daniel and God
NoIm at some bloody work picnic and tried to scrub through here but can any1 tell me if jj or the like have mentioned anything?
God is Daniel on hair daytell me the difference?
Work picnic? Rookie error, wrd, serious rookie errorIm at some bloody work picnic and tried to scrub through here but can any1 tell me if jj or the like have mentioned anything?
Sorry, I just find "work picnic" brilliant!Im at some bloody work picnic and tried to scrub through here but can any1 tell me if jj or the like have mentioned anything?
Balls!... If he said, we're interested in a player with a cock, are you going to connect every link to non-eunuch players to his ITK? ...
All speculation but apparently we're offering more cash up front and want him now, whereas Arsenal want to pay a big chunk of it later and loan him back.Almost too funny and too good to be true.
So did I get this right, Arse's deal opted for a loan-back but we are pushing for a direct transfer?
Please say that’s not true?
Sorry, I just find "work picnic" brilliant!
I don’t think anyone has said we want him now. Certainly no source that I’ve seen. It’s just people assuming.All speculation but apparently we're offering more cash up front and want him now, whereas Arsenal want to pay a big chunk of it later and loan him back.
If that's the case it will depend on whether St Etienne would prefer cash now or to keep him for a year. Since he only played 15 times they might prefer the money and Arse presumably can't restructure without blowing this summers transfer kitty.
Will be interesting to see how this plays out.