What's new

Redknapp yesterday

Krafty

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2004
4,797
2,139
Don't have a problem with harry not jumping around on the sidelines - if anything I'm more worried when he does!

Jordan and Bond are the rottweilers, Harry is there just to enforce the point if the player isn't listening to two coaches.

His inaction with substitutions does annoy me sometimes, and Parker on for VDV in the 90th minute on sunday took the piss. But the lack of jumping and shouting doesn't annoy me, as others do it instead
 

Mr Pink

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2010
55,385
100,906
Just as well the England job is gone as i think Harry would be accused of not giving a toss if we get CL in any shape or form, i think some of the anti Harry comments are getting a little boring now.I think Harrys comments were taken out of context, i got the impression he meant he was happy with a point only because we were 1-0 down with 10 men, is that really such a bad thing to say, i look at the bigger picture and think that one point may be vital and could be massive come sunday, we obviously didn't want it to be out of our hands but that point means the scum and newcastle must win if we beat Fulham, if we had lost the scum would have secured 3rd with just a draw at wba, also Chelsea could have caught us with a win and a draw, now they must win both their games.

I am positive tbh, the scenario for us to not qualify for the CL (fuck 3rd lets just qualify ffs)...is all in our favour, the scum must win away, newcastle must win away and Chelsea must win away to bayern in their own ground..all those have to happen providing we do our bit....its not over!!...this can still be a succesful season.

Think that post is a little cracker, nice one.
 

bomberH

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2005
28,471
168,308
stemark you're so cute with your little red crosses :), tell your kids about it I'm sure they're really proud.

I really hope you don't get a nervous twitch or involuntary spasm at some point in your life.

Disagree. I sort of hope he does, but I didn't want to give you a red cross...

Anyway, he blatantly has involuntary spasms the second his fingers touch a keyboard.
 

Mr Pink

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2010
55,385
100,906
Maybe Stemark is attracted to Harry and his twitch and fights these emotions by lashing out at Harry's management style on here? Denial can be a powerful tool, no pun intended.
 

mabolsa_ritchey

aka Hugh G Rection
Oct 23, 2005
1,424
1,582
http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2896...nham-a-change-of-attitude-is-long-overdue-if?

Interesting article on Redknapp this morning. Probably sums up some people's feelings.
I actually agree with that article, which is strange considering the site its on. The mentality needs to change. Forget the fact that we were down to 10 men for most of the second half, who here is seriously happy with a point?
When we needed to win (and it looked like we would probably go on to win even with 10 men) Redknapp decided to take off VDV and bring on Parker. Whatever happened to "to dare is to do"?
That was as good a chance to get an extra 2 points as we're likely to get for a long time and we decide to hold on to what we have rather than go for the win. We might as well just accept 5th or 6th place now.
 

stemark44

Well-Known Member
Mar 17, 2005
6,598
1,829
Sorry my twitch must have put me off................I meant to give you a dumb instead.:)
 

bomberH

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2005
28,471
168,308
I actually agree with that article, which is strange considering the site its on. The mentality needs to change. Forget the fact that we were down to 10 men for most of the second half, who here is seriously happy with a point?
When we needed to win (and it looked like we would probably go on to win even with 10 men) Redknapp decided to take off VDV and bring on Parker. Whatever happened to "to dare is to do"?
That was as good a chance to get an extra 2 points as we're likely to get for a long time and we decide to hold on to what we have rather than go for the win. We might as well just accept 5th or 6th place now.

I disagree with all of this. Redknapp didn't decide to bring vdV off for tactical reasons, he was injured. And that was the 89th minute. It's also been explained a million times why a point is so important as a loss would've made it almost impossible to finish 3rd. No matter how poor a team is, when you're a) one nil down with b) ten men and c) away from home, a point is a good result. If Defoe had come on (which is what I wanted btw) and we conceded, imagine the outrage then. And they did have a couple of opportunities when they played it through our defence, it wouldn't have been a massive surprise if they did eventually catch us on the break. I'm gutted at the way it panned out but Rose lost his head for a second and that cost us the game more than anything Harry did. 11 men would've won us that game in my opinion.
 
Top