- Mar 21, 2007
- 6,690
- 8,040
Luvly! Wet Spam buried for good.
Gulp!
But the memories last forever.
Don't think the stadium will have much of an effect on player purchases, simply because we don't do much net spending on players anyway
We usually only spend the money from player sales to reinvest in the squad
Every now and again we might have a season where we end up with a £20m net spend, but that's very manageable for a club of our revenue
Not saying that our transfer policies couldn't be improved upon, but I don't see them being greatly effected by the stadium build
Incidentally, it's interesting that the press don't report this. They just go with the line that we'll struggle while the stadium is being built and then paid for. This, in turn, leads to opposition fans parrotting the same line
My reading of it is that its the builders who put it there in the first place.love the way that they've camouflaged it by putting a handful of gravel over the top of it. There's absolutely no way that any of the builders could possibly see that and remove it
My reading of it is that its the builders who put it there in the first place.
They should not have any sway anyway. The only arguments I have ever heard against safe standing have been based on emotion, they have never had a basis in fact.Report on the BBC about safe standing and rail seats, Liverpool fans have voted 88% in favour. quite a milestone I think.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/40767568
True but it is a sensitive issue to the club and they won't want to go against their wishes, this will allow them to make their own decision.They should not have any sway anyway. The only arguments I have ever heard against safe standing have been based on emotion, they have never had a basis in fact.