New Stadium Details And Discussions

[CoopsieDeadpool]

'twas a joke, nothing more. Posted because of people constantly slagging off "tight Levy" . Lighten up man

 

[Adam456]

Looks pwoper busy now

Who was it who was saying it would never be built under Levy again ? As recently as Autumn 2015

 

[RichieS]

'twas a joke, nothing more. Posted because of people constantly slagging off "tight Levy" . Lighten up man

As was my post... Your comment made me think of that sketch.

 

[tiger666]

Looks pwoper busy now

Who was it who was saying it would never be built under Levy again ? As recently as Autumn 2015

Cornelius Knob?

 

[kmk]

Are those metal mesh structures pile caps?

 

[mpickard2087]

Looks pwoper busy now

Who was it who was saying it would never be built under Levy again ? As recently as Autumn 2015

Cornelius Knob?

Mr Knob was the most vocal, however several posters on here heavily flirted with the opinion that Levy was 'pretending' to build a new stadium...

 

[tiger666]

Mr Knob was the most vocal, however several posters on here heavily flirted with the opinion that Levy was 'pretending' to build a new stadium...

People are idiots.

 

[davidmatzdorf]

.

 

[CoopsieDeadpool]

As was my post... Your comment made me think of that sketch.

Aah sorry mate .. Excuse my original post, please. Wife has gone to Essex today, to see her dad for a week. That means I've been up since 05.30 , have 3 little shits, I mean 3 kids to look after, as well as our 2 dogs, too.

Suffice to say, if I didn't have the same hair as Daniel Levy, I'd have pulled it all out by now

 

[Garyldn]

Did I read somewhere that Building is taking place 8 till 8 , 7 days a week ?

 

[tottenmal]

Did I read somewhere that Building is taking place 8 till 8 , 7 days a week ?

From what I understand that was agreed with Haringey in the planning meeting. Probably won't be 7 days a week at this stage, but it gives them room later on.

 

[Adam456]

I am just a layman when it comes to construction but seeing those pics and the 12hrs/7 days talk I can't stop thinking about where they will be one year from now. The idea of closing the north stand this time next season and how that might accelerate the timetable. Wondering if maybe, just maybe, it might mean only 1 full season away

 

[kmk]

.

?

 

[davidmatzdorf]

?

Wrote a comment, realised what I had written was incorrect, removed it.

 

[Lilbaz]

Wrote a comment, realised what I had written was incorrect, removed it.

You could just delete the post?

 

[Rogmeister]

I'm guessing the white transit is full of Polish immigrants smuggled in by Levy so he can save a few quid in labour costs

 

[davidmatzdorf]

You could just delete the post?

Tried, it wouldn't do it.

 

[Spurs1960]

I have written evidence that WHU have a permanent veto from WHU themselvesbefore anyone else disagrees!

They haven't got a veto. They can complain if other uses of the stadium might possibly effect the pitch. This will then go to an independant advisor who will make the decision.

Sorry fella I have it in writing from West Ham United themselves, they say they have a permanent right of veto and I think they know what deal they have signed better than anyone here.

 

[Achap]

I have written evidence that WHU have a permanent veto from WHU themselvesbefore anyone else disagrees!


Sorry fella I have it in writing from West Ham United themselves, they say they have a permanent right of veto and I think they know what deal they have signed better than anyone here.

Sorry fella, the public have it in writing from the LLDC themselves, they say that WHU does not have a veto, and I think they know what deal they have signed better than you.
Under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the Information Commissioners Office issued a Decision notice dated 3 September, 2015, Reference: FS50556618, containing the following statement:

Clause 7 Page 6.
Any clause which allows West Ham to have a veto over or other influence over other tenants of the stadium or one-off uses of the stadium.

LLDC’s position: provisions for WHUFC’s use of the stadium, referred to under the defined term ‘Overriding Priority Principle’ and associated clauses, were disclosed in the version of the agreement supplied to the complainant. This states that the WHUFC has priority use of the stadium and WHUFC has rights to enforce this principle.
Under the agreement, however, WHUFC does not have a veto over other uses/users of the stadium in addition to the Overriding Priority Principle.

The 'Overriding Principle' referred to is to ensure that their fixture list is not compromised by other users of the stadium – so that there could not, for example, be an athletics meeting taking place at the same time as they are playing football. They would also have priority if the Premier League scheduled another football team to play there at the same time as WHU.

This has also been stated many times in many different publications, as well as being discussed on this thread, but if you have contradictory information direct from WHU you may wish to query it with them or the LLDC or ICO.

https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2015/1432468/fs_50556618.pdf

 

[Spursidol]

Sorry fella, the public have it in writing from the LLDC themselves, they say that WHU does not have a veto, and I think they know what deal they have signed better than you.
Under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the Information Commissioners Office issued a Decision notice dated 3 September, 2015, Reference: FS50556618, containing the following statement:

Clause 7 Page 6.
Any clause which allows West Ham to have a veto over or other influence over other tenants of the stadium or one-off uses of the stadium.

LLDC’s position: provisions for WHUFC’s use of the stadium, referred to under the defined term ‘Overriding Priority Principle’ and associated clauses, were disclosed in the version of the agreement supplied to the complainant. This states that the WHUFC has priority use of the stadium and WHUFC has rights to enforce this principle.
Under the agreement, however, WHUFC does not have a veto over other uses/users of the stadium in addition to the Overriding Priority Principle.

The 'Overriding Principle' referred to is to ensure that their fixture list is not compromised by other users of the stadium – so that there could not, for example, be an athletics meeting taking place at the same time as they are playing football. They would also have priority if the Premier League scheduled another football team to play there at the same time as WHU.

This has also been stated many times in many different publications, as well as being discussed on this thread, but if you have contradictory information direct from WHU you may wish to query it with them or the LLDC or ICO.

https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2015/1432468/fs_50556618.pdf

'They would also have priority if the Premier League scheduled another football team to play there at the same time as WHU'.

And that in turn probably means its impractical to share the ground with another PL club