What's new

Joško Gvardiol

Yiddo100

Well-Known Member
Jan 16, 2019
9,936
52,172
But then why would they turn down say £60m this year, if there is a £43m release clause next year? They’d effectively be paying a £17m loan fee for a year of football.
I’m not sure but they’ve done the exact same thing with nkunku
 

Matrix

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
2,924
5,680
Jeez I hope not!

I follow F1 - Horner and Red Bull generate more whine than a straight cut gearbox! ?

No way I’d want THFC associated with that lot! ??

I stopped buying Red Bull because of them, can have my shekels help that mob.
 

Ghost Hardware

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
18,619
64,423
But then why would they turn down say £60m this year, if there is a £43m release clause next year? They’d effectively be paying a £17m loan fee for a year of football.
Its also the case if you buy a player via a release clause you normally have to pay that fee in one go rather then spreading the payments out over several years. Most clubs on the whole aren't so keen to pay that amount in one lump sum. They did the same thing with Nkunku, release clause from next summer for £60 mil. Ultimately it means they will get more instant capitol and it benefits the player also as it means they can ask for larger contracts. its like BVB and Haaland, im sure he is getting stupid wages by City.
 

synththfc

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2017
3,741
26,720
This has never been on if you ask me. All media led. We’d have known for ages that he has no interest in coming and they have no interest in selling.
i have no doubt he’d have come here until they brought the release clause into play.

before, if we were willing to stump up 80 million and there was no other path out, he’s probably move.

now, with a 45-ish million release clause? he’ll have all of europes top clubs at his door.

it’s a very solid business model from leipzig and one that, while i don’t necessarily think we should adopt, we may need to incorporate if we’re going to try and challenge city and liverpool and recruit europe’s elite young talent.
 

worcestersauce

"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
Jan 23, 2006
27,010
45,321
The release clause level is a bit irrelevant, they've secured him for another year knowing they'll have to consider selling him next year so they've started the bidding at a reserve fee of apparently £43m, it will rise well beyond that.
 

ButchCassidy

Well-Known Member
Jul 12, 2012
3,986
15,846
The release clause level is a bit irrelevant, they've secured him for another year knowing they'll have to consider selling him next year so they've started the bidding at a reserve fee of apparently £43m, it will rise well beyond that.
Why would it rise beyond that?
 

Yiddo100

Well-Known Member
Jan 16, 2019
9,936
52,172
The release clause level is a bit irrelevant, they've secured him for another year knowing they'll have to consider selling him next year so they've started the bidding at a reserve fee of apparently £43m, it will rise well beyond that.
Not if the release clause is 43m
 

Trix

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2004
19,667
332,021
This has never been on if you ask me. All media led. We’d have known for ages that he has no interest in coming and they have no interest in selling.
Nah agent led. He contacted us too(obviously knowing we were interested).

Is there anything concrete regarding the new contract, or is it all based off the Mail headline which is quoting that Croatian journalist?
 

mark87

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2004
36,269
115,402
Because it's a release clause not a "buy now" figure.
If someone offers £43 there's nothing to stop someone else offering £50 and so on, RB can accept a higher offer.

Why would a club offer £50m when Leipzig would have to accept an offer of £43m?
 

Yiddo100

Well-Known Member
Jan 16, 2019
9,936
52,172
Because it's a release clause not a "buy now" figure.
If someone offers £43 there's nothing to stop someone else offering £50 and so on, RB can accept a higher offer.
No one should be offering 50m for a player has a 43m release clause, it makes no sense
 

freeeki

Arsehole.
Aug 5, 2008
11,855
69,551
Because it's a release clause not a "buy now" figure.
If someone offers £43 there's nothing to stop someone else offering £50 and so on, RB can accept a higher offer.

...why would someone offer £50m when the release clause is £43m?

Please make it make sense
 

SpartanSpur

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
12,560
43,103
Because it's a release clause not a "buy now" figure.
If someone offers £43 there's nothing to stop someone else offering £50 and so on, RB can accept a higher offer.

You could but that would be stupid. If we offered £50m and Bayern £43m he could still choose to go to them and RB couldn't stop it.
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,701
104,998
Nah agent led. He contacted us too(obviously knowing we were interested).

Is there anything concrete regarding the new contract, or is it all based off the Mail headline which is quoting that Croatian journalist?

There was that guy from transfermarkt as well unless that’s the same bloke.
 

SpartanSpur

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
12,560
43,103
Looks like Chelsea are going for Ake. I assume that takes them out of the running for Gvardiol but also probably gives City the ability to gazump any offer we could make for him this summer or next.
 

barry

Bring me Messi
May 22, 2005
6,505
15,345
Because it's a release clause not a "buy now" figure.
If someone offers £43 there's nothing to stop someone else offering £50 and so on, RB can accept a higher offer.
The only reason they'd do this is to stagger the payments, but I'm sure they could still get better rates getting a loan and paying the release fee. The release clause is the release so anyone who offers 43m in one go has to be accepted.
 
Top