Heads Up Yids and Yidettes

[kaz Hirai]

wonder how Chelsea would have got on yesterday if our team was

--------------Lloris
Walker--Vert-Caulker--BAE* (kaboul suspended for being a racist)

-------Parker*---Sandro
----------Dembele*

--Lennon--Defoe---Bale*


and their team was missing

Terry
Cole
Mikel
Oscar
Hazard

think the result would have been much much different in our favour to be honest. The large amount of key personal we are missing rarely gets brought up, yet when we beat united it was all about their injury problems

I think we gave a decent account of ourselves with half the team ripped out! On a seperate note, thats enough of friedel now Andre, he really reminded me of Neville Southall trying to play in the premiership at 40, just looked slow to react to shots, akward and extremely reluctant to come off his line. he hasnt kept a clean sheet all season, time to be the experienced back up!

 

[carpediem991]

To be honest, City, United and Chelsea are one step above us and if there happens nothing surprising, they should be the top 3.

But look at the fourth spot. All contenders (Everton, Newcastle, Arsenal) couldn't win against easier opponents.

Very confident that we can make the top 4 this year!

 

[Blake Griffin]

friedel​

walker kaboul king ekotto​

lennon parker modric bale​

van der vaart​

adebayor​

​

i can't believe this team finished 4th last season, what an underachievement.​

 

[spurs mental]

Fucking hell.....

That's a great constructive post and a fantastic point you make.

Oh wait, it's actually not.

Try come up with a point or two to prove me wrong or actually start a discussion next time. Cheers

 

[Bulletspur]

As said in the match thread, where someone else said the same thing:

We were without:
Kaboul
BAE
Dembélé
Bale

Also unavailable:
Scotty Parker

Not starting (for whatever reason):
Lloris
Adebayor

And yet we were in the game and created plenty of opportunities, against the unbeaten league leaders who were pretty much full strength, right up to the ninety minute when, moments after going very close to equalising while in the process of heaping a great deal of pressure on, they scored a killer goal right at the death due to a horrible individual error, and that made the result look far more decisive than it was. This in the middle of a transition period for us.

Under those circumstances, I actually reached the opposite conclusion. Do you believe that the game would have been anything like that if either we were full-strength, too, or they had the level of absentees we had to cope with?

I am watching the game for the first time. 32 mintues gone. If the first half was as bad as others have been saying compared to the 2nd, then I will say that we will be finishing top four! I have seen so many positives, so score line aside, it doesnt look as bad as what has been said, considering we are playing with at least five first teamers missing!!

 

[StartingPrice]

I am watching the game for the first time. 32 mintues gone. If the first half was as bad as others have been saying compared to the 2nd, then I will say that we will be finishing top four! I have seen so many positives, so score line aside, it doesnt look as bad as what has been said, considering we are playing with at least five first teamers missing!!

Cause to be disappointed because we lost to a very good Chelsea team, and they are rivals and dirty Chav s. Not cause to go back to the dark side of the bi-polar nightmare, IMVHO

 

[WestBelfast Spurs]

Dempsey and Sigardsson are pointless signings. Both are the epitomy of average and aren't good enough for a club who supposedly want to challenge for the champions league.

Both can fuck off quite frankly.

the same Clint Dempsey that banged in over 20 goals last year are you sure!!!

 

[ultimateloner]

And i thought i was controversial calling for AvB's head if he fails to get us CL this year...
But Dempsey and Siggy out after less than 10 games??? Dempsey is the highest goal scoring midfielder for 2 straight seasons playing for a mid-table team; not as classy as VdV but has the potential to give us even more. Siggy is 22 scoring 10+ goals for a team in the lower half of the table and NOT requring a work permit, costing less than Bentley did.
Fickle fans...we lost against a better team whats the problem? if we played barca and lost whats the big deal??

 

[AW?]

Surely it's just Yids now and not Yidettes? I mean it's just actors now isn't it?

And yes I do need to get out more.

 

[StartingPrice]

Surely it's just Yids now and not Yidettes? I mean it's just actors now isn't it?

And yes I do need to get out more.

1) It sounds sexier - Yidettes = cool. What can our rivals do to match that?
ArseScum = Arsettes? Goonettes? Skankettes?
Chelsea = Glory-Hunterettes? Chavettes?
WetSpam = Hamettes? Spamettes? Pikeyettes?

Yidettes could be a groovy sixties Northern Soul girl band

2) One of our more femininely actuated members recently created a thread calling upon her Yidettes. Did you see it? I take my cue from her. Indeed, I would be very keen to ingratiate myself with her I am sure you saw that thread...and if you did, why did you not pull her up? I think that is the real question here...why are you picking on me, you man-hating pervert!!!

 

[AW?]

1) It sounds sexier - Yidettes = cool. What can our rivals do to match that?
ArseScum = Arsettes? Goonettes? Skankettes?
Chelsea = Glory-Hunterettes? Chavettes?
WetSpam = Hamettes? Spamettes? Pikeyettes?

Yidettes could be a groovy sixties Northern Soul girl band

2) One of our more femininely actuated members recently created a thread calling upon her Yidettes. Did you see it? I take my cue from her. Indeed, I would be very keen to ingratiate myself with her I am sure you saw that thread...and if you did, why did you not pull her up? I think that is the real question here...why are you picking on me, you man-hating pervert!!!

I did see that thread. Feminine could be a slight overstatement in terms of the ladies in that thread which I actually picked up on myself and was my only input in it.

P.S. Ignore me I was just in a silly mood earlier

 

[Blackcanary]

1) It sounds sexier - Yidettes = cool. What can our rivals do to match that?
ArseScum = Arsettes? Goonettes? Skankettes?
Chelsea = Glory-Hunterettes? Chavettes?
WetSpam = Hamettes? Spamettes? Pikeyettes?

Yidettes could be a groovy sixties Northern Soul girl band

2) One of our more femininely actuated members recently created a thread calling upon her Yidettes. Did you see it? I take my cue from her. Indeed, I would be very keen to ingratiate myself with her I am sure you saw that thread...and if you did, why did you not pull her up? I think that is the real question here...why are you picking on me, you man-hating pervert!!!

The one in bold is a winner. Sounds like a feminist travelling Monty Python theatre group.

 

[AW?]

Hamettes and spamettes made me seriously think about going down to the kitchen and getting an omlette on the go.

 

[StartingPrice]

I did see that thread. Feminine could be a slight overstatement in terms of the ladies in that thread which I actually picked up on myself and was my only input in it.

P.S. Ignore me I was just in a silly mood earlier

You might want to consider some punctuation in this sentence...it could make you sound even more of a pervy lecherous type fella than as you have already been outed, as like, already

The one in bold is a winner. Sounds like a feminist travelling Monty Python theatre group.

Well, one things for sure, they would be in the right place for an endless supply of toys off those classy owners of theirs, the Dildo Brothas

I actually liked the Arsettes...but that is probably because my hatred of the Goons is all consuming

 

[AW?]

I make no apologies for being a lech and it's just as well as i don't do punctuation particularly well either

 

[StartingPrice]

I make no apologies for being a lech and it's just as well as i don't do punctuation particularly well either

Lech Wałęsa?

 

[Ionman34]

I understand what you mean, but I also understand what AM means. I was going to make the same point you have, but this is one of those occasions where stats really can be deceptive. The fact is, Chelsea were getting around and through us with disconcerting ease and had several breaks where they really should have done better. My heart was in my mouth whenever they broke forward. That is why I emphasised that we created so many chances as to have been good value for a draw whether we deserved it or not - because, frankly, they carved through us with ease on innumerable occasions (not least with Verts last ditch, King-esque steal).

Conversely, the volume of chances we created suggests that we 'carved through them' a fair few times ourselves SP. the reports of the second half suggest this too mate. I won't be seeing the game until this weekend, when I get back home, so I'm not sure, just playing Devils Advocate based on reports I've read and the stats I've seen.

What I am wondering about is the quality of the carving, so to speak. From what I'm hearing, only one of their goals, Mata's second, resulted from this, the others were from defensive 'frailties'.

Foxtel reported a 51% to 49% possession in Cheatski's favour. Everything else, bar the goals scored, was in ours. Hardly seems like we were outclassed there in anything other than the finishing, and that largely down to one man, Mata.

In a nutshell it was game winning quality that swung it from what I'm hearing and reading. They had theirs, ours was missing.

 

[StartingPrice]

Conversely, the volume of chances we created suggests that we 'carved through them' a fair few times ourselves SP. the reports of the second half suggest this too mate. I won't be seeing the game until this weekend, when I get back home, so I'm not sure, just playing Devils Advocate based on reports I've read and the stats I've seen.

What I am wondering about is the quality of the carving, so to speak. From what I'm hearing, only one of their goals, Mata's second, resulted from this, the others were from defensive 'frailties'.

Foxtel reported a 51% to 49% possession in Cheatski's favour. Everything else, bar the goals scored, was in ours. Hardly seems like we were outclassed there in anything other than the finishing, and that largely down to one man, Mata.

In a nutshell it was game winning quality that swung it from what I'm hearing and reading. They had theirs, ours was missing.

I wasn't saying we hadn't created plenty of chances...in fact, I think I specifically said just that.
What I was saying, for the sake of clarification with AM, who questioned my statement that we could have won and deserved it if we did, was that we created plenty of good chances and so, if we had won we would have been good value for it, even if we didn't literally deserve it in any exact comparative way (based on any number of factors, such as attemps, clear-cut chances, possession, etc., etc.).

You are right, in that Chelsea scored a few goals coming from individual errors, but what none of this shows is the number of times they carved through us and really should have punished us more fully - as I said, my heart was almost constantly in my mouth. I would have been happy with a draw, and would not hesitate to say that they didn't deserve their win, just the same as we would have been good value for a draw or win. Which, I guess, makes the point of my OP - under the circumstances, we did pretty damned good, even if I wouldn't have any problems in saying they played well, too, and weren't flukey winners, by any means.