- Jan 12, 2005
- 2,304
- 3,647
1. You've admitted yourself that those stats are based on 2 games against 2 very good teams...and to add a human element do you think Friedel should have saved any of the goals today?
2. Those stats don't include Gomes' balls up do they? Or his inconsistency at catching crosses etc. Basically his erratic goalkeeping isn't reflected in those stats.
Personally I think Gomes, at his best, is better than Friedel. But using such simplistic stats proves nothing.
Point 2 is covered in the stats. If Gomes lets one through his hands it's reflected, if he fumbles a cross or gives away a penalty, it will show up as a goal in these stats.
Unfortunately point 1 is subjective. The reason I bought Robinson into the argument is that nearly all our fans were making the same argument about him. He was conceding a lot of goals for the shots he was facing but the defence was always 'no other keeper would have saved that wonder shot' yet Gomes came in and we started to concede less goals from the amount of shots faced.
The other subjective point is goalkeeping style. Someone like Gomes allows the defence to play higher up the pitch which stops attacking teams putting crosses into the most dangerous areas.
OK he may come out and flap at some of these but if it stops 5 dangerous crosses coming in which would result in 2 goals compared to stopping 5 crosses which result in him flapping and conceding 1 then the net result is better.
But, as with Robbo, a lot of supporters won't see or appreciate this because making a mistake to concede a goal is more obvious than allowing crosses into the 6 yard box and conceding point blank headers.
As ss57 has shown Friedel may have been a better keeper 2 or 3 seasons ago but he's on the downturn whilst Gomes is improving so why is Friedel being preferred to Gomes in the first place?