- Jan 3, 2009
- 1,773
- 3,018
But the fact that Archway are appealing has nothing to do with us needing to spend a year away from WHL. Clever spin by Levy et Cullen. Regardless of when the build starts, we'll still have a season where the final section of the new stadium needs to be completed an WHL needs to be demolished. We've already heard that the reasons for moving away for a year are the higher cost of a phased build and getting everything on site twice. Archway's appeal has enabled Levy to find a scapegoat for the fact we're moving away for a year - which has on been on the table for ages.