What's new

Thor Rising - Why Gylfi Needs a Change of Position to Salvage his Tottenham Career

Spurs1960

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2011
2,424
1,220
http://www.cartilagefreecaptain.com..._medium=referral&utm_campaign=spursprss.co.uk

As many of you know, I avidly follow the Russian Premier League and national team, who took on Gylfi Sigurðsson's Iceland last night. Much to my surprise, Gylfi lined up as the deep lying playmaker in Iceland's midfield and created by far the most dangerous chances for his side all night. His ability in a deeper role truly surprised me and he was the most effective Icelandic player on the pitch for the full 90 minutes.


Unfortunately for Gylfi, Iceland succumbed to their opponents 2-0 and went home empty handed, but a very important lesson can be learned from his performance; Gylfi can succeed outside of his preferred attacking midfield slot. Whilst his chances of earning consistent playing time either in a deeper position or behind the striker at Tottenham seem incredibly slim, his versatility allows him to threaten for places elsewhere on the pitch, as we have seen over the course of this season. Having filled in as a sub on both wings, the Icelandic midfielder has been incredibly unlucky this season, with notable near-misses against Everton, Stoke and Norwich. Nevertheless, his playing time has been severely limited and his development has slowed, but he still has time to turn things around.



Gylfi is still a very talented individual, and to write him off after only a few appearances, mostly off the bench, would be a terrible mistake. At only 23, Sigurðsson could very well go through something of a renaissance by trying out another position, and that is where his and Tottenham's needs overlap. Tottenham need a striker and Gylfi needs a new position. Now, before you laugh me out of here, let me explain why I think this would be a good idea. Gylfi is decently sized and a capable header of the ball, yet he is also excellent with the ball at his feet and has an excellent shot on him. Also, as the best set piece taker on the squad, some effort should be made to fit him into the starting XI so that Tottenham can add a new dimension to their attack and find extra ways to break down resilient defences.



I recognise that this may be an odd viewpoint to take, but I'd like to point out that my belief that Gylfi would make a good striker is quite removed from those who believe that Gareth Bale should be given a go up front. Firstly, Bale is first on the team sheet every week and does not need a shift in position to get playing time, whereas Sigurðsson is the complete opposite. He will probably see very little time on the pitch as Clint Dempsey and Lewis Holtby battle it out for the attacking midfield position for the rest of the season. Secondly, Sigurðsson could not possibly be worse than Jermain Defoe and Emmanuel Adebayor have been in recent months. Our strikers have failed to score a goal in more than a month, yet we have not lost in that time, as we have been getting goals from other parts of the pitch. If Gylfi can come into the striker slot and score just a few times, results would improve, assuming those goals from Bale and other players keep on coming.



I'm not saying that Gylfi is our world-class striker signing and I still believe that Daniel Levy should splash money on a good striker in the summer, but for the time being, Gylfi is a solid and capable player who could do well on his own up front. Right now is one of the most important times in his development, so he needs playing time one way or another. Gylfi Sigurðsson is a player whose future is in flux, so now is the perfect time for him to reinvent himself and gain a place in Tottenham Hotspur's line-up, both now and for the future.
 

Kalim

Pakispur
Dec 10, 2006
1,285
996
Not sure if he is quick enough to be a striker, but like the rest of your oiece.
 

Mullers

Unknown member
Jan 4, 2006
25,914
16,413
He's not a striker. I think it would be interesting to see him in center midfield alongside Dembele.
 

Spursidol

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2007
12,636
15,834
http://www.cartilagefreecaptain.com..._medium=referral&utm_campaign=spursprss.co.uk

As many of you know, I avidly follow the Russian Premier League and national team, who took on Gylfi Sigurðsson's Iceland last night. Much to my surprise, Gylfi lined up as the deep lying playmaker in Iceland's midfield and created by far the most dangerous chances for his side all night. His ability in a deeper role truly surprised me and he was the most effective Icelandic player on the pitch for the full 90 minutes.


Unfortunately for Gylfi, Iceland succumbed to their opponents 2-0 and went home empty handed, but a very important lesson can be learned from his performance; Gylfi can succeed outside of his preferred attacking midfield slot. Whilst his chances of earning consistent playing time either in a deeper position or behind the striker at Tottenham seem incredibly slim, his versatility allows him to threaten for places elsewhere on the pitch, as we have seen over the course of this season. Having filled in as a sub on both wings, the Icelandic midfielder has been incredibly unlucky this season, with notable near-misses against Everton, Stoke and Norwich. Nevertheless, his playing time has been severely limited and his development has slowed, but he still has time to turn things around.


Gylfi is still a very talented individual, and to write him off after only a few appearances, mostly off the bench, would be a terrible mistake. At only 23, Sigurðsson could very well go through something of a renaissance by trying out another position, and that is where his and Tottenham's needs overlap. Tottenham need a striker and Gylfi needs a new position. Now, before you laugh me out of here, let me explain why I think this would be a good idea. Gylfi is decently sized and a capable header of the ball, yet he is also excellent with the ball at his feet and has an excellent shot on him. Also, as the best set piece taker on the squad, some effort should be made to fit him into the starting XI so that Tottenham can add a new dimension to their attack and find extra ways to break down resilient defences.


I recognise that this may be an odd viewpoint to take, but I'd like to point out that my belief that Gylfi would make a good striker is quite removed from those who believe that Gareth Bale should be given a go up front. Firstly, Bale is first on the team sheet every week and does not need a shift in position to get playing time, whereas Sigurðsson is the complete opposite. He will probably see very little time on the pitch as Clint Dempsey and Lewis Holtby battle it out for the attacking midfield position for the rest of the season. Secondly, Sigurðsson could not possibly be worse than Jermain Defoe and Emmanuel Adebayor have been in recent months. Our strikers have failed to score a goal in more than a month, yet we have not lost in that time, as we have been getting goals from other parts of the pitch. If Gylfi can come into the striker slot and score just a few times, results would improve, assuming those goals from Bale and other players keep on coming.


I'm not saying that Gylfi is our world-class striker signing and I still believe that Daniel Levy should splash money on a good striker in the summer, but for the time being, Gylfi is a solid and capable player who could do well on his own up front. Right now is one of the most important times in his development, so he needs playing time one way or another. Gylfi Sigurðsson is a player whose future is in flux, so now is the perfect time for him to reinvent himself and gain a place in Tottenham Hotspur's line-up, both now and for the future.

The obvious thing to do would be for the coaches to try him out as a striker in a few training matches as a striker - he might need coaching in that role, but the training matches would pretty soon show if the idea is a runner or not..
 

ginger

Active Member
Apr 6, 2012
98
157
I could see him and dempsey interchanging beautifully from the front, and think that this is really worth a try. Both are 6foot1+, and are technically solid (though not excellent) enough to make the ball stick better than defoe , and have the physicality/workrate to make this work. Siggi is better (using his remarkable) two footed shooting ability from distance and Dempsey better using his instincts to arrive late in the box to poach, and so they could both interchange into their prefered positions during attacking transitions. The pairs lack of pace is not so relevent as lenno/bale provide plenty enough to force defensive lines deep, and with our pressent pressing style of play neither winger is a visionary number 10 looking to slot killer balls behind the back 4, rather a pressure game based on high quantity of shots/rebounds per game.

Certainly Ade is better than him, but I would happily give this a try against Newcastle if he does not arrive back in time.
 

lol

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2008
6,652
6,083
So because he had a good game as a deep-lying playmaker, he would make a good striker?

No.

exactly. i was reading the article and half way through i'm like ' yea ok..as a DLP yea waitt WUTTT??? lmao at them ending off by saying he should be a striker. clearly siggy has a few choices

1. upstage holtby at the amc and cement his place
2. learn to play cm as DLP
3. learn how to play at the wing
4. gets sold

i feel that the only reason why we didnt sell him to reading was cause we had absolutely no replacement and will be paper thin if we sold him. should the offer come again in summer, i wouldnt be surprise if he gets sold to fund for someone avb wants
 

hoodlum

eye have won eye, plus too others
Apr 4, 2011
2,844
1,614
I like Sig's potential a lot, but it seems like AVB sees him as a square peg in a round hole at the moment. He clearly sees Sig's talent as he uses him late in games, but that appears to be as a last ditch effort based solely on his natural talent rather than fit.

I hope he stays and carves out a real solid role in the team, but if not he certainly has value to other clubs that could help Spurs fund a CF down the line.
 

Spurs1960

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2011
2,424
1,220
The obvious thing to do would be for the coaches to try him out as a striker in a few training matches as a striker - he might need coaching in that role, but the training matches would pretty soon show if the idea is a runner or not..

AVB has already said he can cover the position.
 

teok

Well-Known Member
Aug 11, 2011
10,873
33,729
I think it's a testament to the ridiculously high quality of our midfield that players like gylfi don't quite make it. No shame in it at all.
 

Dembele'Disciple

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2012
423
377
I've also thought about him as a striker and it should be something we're considering trying. He's got all the tools but whether he'd put them together is a mystry. One of the great things about him is that he's double footed which is a quality I love in strikers as it allows them to finish at whatever angle.
 

BK007

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
1,136
843
He deserves a run more than Dempsey.

Don't know why the opposite's happened.

The amount of chances Dempsey's had, I'm sure Siggy would have had a better return.
 

Spurs1960

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2011
2,424
1,220
Bad news when people are inventing positions for a player who can't nail his own down.

There are plenty of players who have had their positions changed and been a success, Thiery Henry for instance and latterly Theo Walcott has scored goals as the central striker down the road.

It is difficult to see how he is going to get game time with Holtby now going to claim the same number 10 role pushing Dempsey to the subs bench as well.
 

Jay070

Active Member
Jul 4, 2012
117
235
Siggy = Kranjcar of this time, excellent player that is extremly likable. Scores long range goals but unfortunate to not be a first IX player but also dont want him going to another team because you know he would be awesome there grrr :)
 

idontgetit

Well-Known Member
Aug 21, 2011
14,493
31,029
I really like the lad and think that him, Holtby and Adebayor would massively click together. The trouble is when I think of the line up it feels like I'm trying to fudge him in to the side and that he doesn't really fit easily
 
Top