Fair enough you don't get to chose (although I doubt every tweet from JJ is posted in the RO), but get off his back - I think we have the right to come on here and say that we think his 'ITK' is bullshit.
If you want me to be more precise on why, then:
Disagree that there's nothing in Bernard, it is VERY rare that there is this amount of press about a player we're interested and there is 'nothing' in it - it might be we've moved on or the price is too high or the deal too complicated, but he doesn't say that. As for the swede scout numpty bit, that's just total opinion and frankly makes JJ look foolish, which is why there is criticism on here IMO.
There are only two possible meaning for this IMO:
1.) Baldini doesn't have a clue about whether the players we want to bring in are any good or not and in JJ's sources' eyes these players being suggested aren't good (for whatever reason).
2.) Baldini doesn't have a clue about our current set of players.
Either way I highly doubt either of these two statements are true as with statement 1.) Baldini has a lot of past success in this area and frankly it could well be that he's been bought in to get some tricky deals done for us rather than be a head scout (i.e. like what happened with Oscar and to an extent Moutinho last summer).
With statement 2.) i should think that's fair enough given that the guy isn't officially working for us right now and again hasn't been bought in to assess the state of the first team (one would think) but rather to push the club forward.
This could actually be true.
or...thirdl