Spurs: Frustrating for years, could finally be HOT SPURS

[Gaz_Gammon]

Maybe Spurs now consider themselves serious contenders for trophies?

Read the full article at Daily Mail

 

[shao]

First comment of 2016

 

[stuffies]

Not a bad read considering its the mail.

 

[Pellshek]

Did the Mail worry that if they didn't put HOT SPURS in capital letters no one would get it?

 

[HotspurFC1950]

This is good. What it all means of course it will be more difficult to find players to slot in. Can't just buy a striker for example because he scores lots of goals.

 

[WhiteHeartLowe]

I have to pinch myself every time I see that goal difference! Its amazing!

 

[longtimespur]

come a long way in a short time

 

[scottlag10]

But they couldn't help themselves by having a dig that we are a selling club......but there are probably only 2, maybe 3, clubs in the world that aren't selling clubs...Real Madrid, Barcelona and Manchester United (if you don't count Ronaldo). And if you look at players that we did sell it was only to 2 of those.....Sheringham (Man Utd), Carrick (Man Utd), Berbatov (Man Utd), Modric (Real Madrid), Bale (Real Madrid)......so its not such a long list so are we really that bad?
PS OK Keane to Liverpool at a push

 

[kremlyn]

Guff. Rubbish article full of regurgitated pulp.

 

[tonyc]

Guff. Rubbish article full of regurgitated pulp.

Maybe so, but no reason to give the OP a Dislike rating, mate.

 

[kremlyn]

Maybe so, but no reason to give the OP a Dislike rating, mate.

Every reason. There's no news in that article so the op could have done us all a favour and not clogged up the site with it.
Mate.

 

[Gaz_Gammon]

Every reason. There's no news in that article so the op could have done us all a favour and not clogged up the site with it.
Mate.

Happy New Year by the way..................

 

[tonyc]

Every reason. There's no news in that article so the op could have done us all a favour and not clogged up the site with it.
Mate.

You seem to be missing the basic understanding of a forum, Krem.

If the post was the OP's own writing then yes give it a Dislike. But it is a newspaper 'article' which they are sharing, not their own views. Remove the dislike, please: and the sarcasm at the end of your post is uncalled for as well.

 

[kremlyn]

No. We've been here before and I think clogging up the forum with click bait for the daily mail and its advertisers is an irresponsible misuse of the forum. I enjoy what Gaz_Gammon contributes when he posts, but not this stuff. I disagree with his decision to share the article. What of it? I didn't call him a name. Not even "mate".

 

[kremlyn]

Grrr

 

[Khilari]

That's pretty great.
What's interesting is that we appear to retain more possession than under AVB. Under him, it seemed all we wanted to do was keep possession and played extremely turgid sideways football, relying initially on Bale to pull it out of the bag.
Now we're really dynamic and I'm surprised we're managing this. Well done Pochettino.

 

[N17Jack]

There have been very few articles to read over the Christmas period, its hardly clogged up and if you dont want to read it, well then dont.

I thought it was a good read myself.

 

[shelfmonkey]

Every reason. There's no news in that article so the op could have done us all a favour and not clogged up the site with it.
Mate.

You are just a bullying communist!!!

 

[shelfmonkey]

Grrr

You need either a shag or a wank!!
Mate.

 

[kremlyn]

You need either a shag or a wank!!
Mate.

Trolling?

Mate.