- May 31, 2007
- 4,510
- 6,183
Yep, 630pmStupid question....
When is the draw? After the last QF match?
Yep, 630pmStupid question....
When is the draw? After the last QF match?
Trix my dear fellow, where is your Derring-do?
No quite, what he said was if it wasn't conclusive via VAR(and it wasn't) then they have to go with the infield decision given by the linesman. He said it was his opinion that it was just onside, but that VAR did not conclusively show that it was. As far as the VAR regulations go the decision was the correct one IMO.
I might be imagining it but didn't MOTD show the view that the var got to see, that Tv audiences didn't during the match, that showed Sonny clearly about two foot offside.
It was looking directly across the line, not that daft view from an angle with the lines drawn across the pitch.
I care. Because getting United or Chelsea reduces our chances of winning the thing. Wigan semi, Leicester final please.Don't care. But what I will say...shouldn't be about whom we wish to avoid, I'm pretty sure that all remaining teams will be hoping to avoid Spurs.
Rightly so.
I left it back in the 1990's when money started to dictate who won what. We haven't won a trophy for over a decade, so for me the glory will be in seeing it lifted, I don't care who we beat on the way to doing that as long as we do.
We're doomed, I tell ye!Whoever we get out of Chelsea, Utd or Leicester, bearing in mind the VAR non decision yesterday, I'm willing to bet the game will be decided by the very same scenario going against us, by that I mean our opponents will have the winning goal ruled offside, only for VAR to rule it onside, even though to everyone watching it will be as inconclusive as yesterday.
We could still lose either of those. I remember that people thought the semi final with Portsmouth would be a walk over. Wigan already put out Man City.I care. Because getting United or Chelsea reduces our chances of winning the thing. Wigan semi, Leicester final please.
The VAR ref/pundit said something along the lines of it was hard to 100% confirm Son was onside. So if there was doubt they would rule it offside. He was then pressed whether he thought Son was on or off and he said on.
So VAR is obviously not fool proof as it still relies on human interpretation!
The Taiwanese channel I was watching seemed to show Son's goal was onside yesterday, but there was no commentary in the bar, yet VAR ruled it offside. Was it mentioned much by the commentators? Didn't affect the result in the end, but they seem to be making a few dodgy calls with it.
This is the image MOTD came up with their jiggery pokery:There's no way he was two foot offside, at half time during the game BT Sport showed he was offside by half of his foot, so the correct decision was made.
Whoever we get out of Chelsea, Utd or Leicester, bearing in mind the VAR non decision yesterday, I'm willing to bet the game will be decided by the very same scenario going against us, by that I mean our opponents will have the winning goal ruled offside, only for VAR to rule it onside, even though to everyone watching it will be as inconclusive as yesterday.
On Wednesday mateStupid question....
When is the draw? After the last QF match?
I might be imagining it but didn't MOTD show the view that the var got to see, that Tv audiences didn't during the match, that showed Sonny clearly about two foot offside.
It was looking directly across the line, not that daft view from an angle with the lines drawn across the pitch.