Player Watch Player Watch: Richarlison

[pedrodelawasp]

We don't need this utter mug at our football club.

Not convinced he is materially better than Lucas, to say nothing of Kulusevski.

I think the rationale would be he can play more naturally as a 9 than anyone other than Kane in our squad, so could provide rotation/injury cover there, but is also versatile enough to play out wide.

Doesn’t display anything like the work rate Conte demands, though, and likely thinks of himself as a first pick type player, rather than a back-up, so unlikely either side would be pushing for this move?

ETA: He is perfect for the bench in FIFA Career Mode, though ?

 

[Pebble Dash]

He’s certainly talented but he’s a massive bellend. May be he’ll grow up one day a bit like Mitrovic has done but for this very moment in time he’s still a cheating, lazy, cry a baby and best kept well clear of.

 

[CoopsieDeadpool]

Gordon and Pickford (won't come here to be a backup GK) are the only players I rate there. Richarlison too but can't stand him.

No idea about Gordon.

Pickford is shit.

Richarlison is a ****.

 

[Spursmatty87]

He’d be a great addition let’s not cloud our judgment because we don’t like him.

 

[daveduvet]

All down to the Don. Got a nose…….





For goal

 

[CoopsieDeadpool]

He’d be a great addition let’s not cloud our judgment because we don’t like him.

No, he's just shit & hyped up because he's Brazilian.

Watford = 38 PL games, 5 goals (5 goals in 41 total appearances)

Everton = 35 PL games, 13 goals. (14 goals in 38 total appearances)

35 PL games, 13 goals. (15 goals in 41 total appearances)...

34 PL games, 7 goals (13 goals in 40 total appearances)

29 PL games, 9 goals (10 goals in 32 total appearances.

He's basically a goal every 4 games, despite being "the main man" at each of his clubs.

He's a sulking, petulant twat who wilts as soon as things aren't going his way.

Upwards of £40M for that? I don't think so!

If we can't find better value, better goals to game ratios, and better personalities for that fee, we may as well just call it a day!

 

[McFlash]

He’d be a great addition let’s not cloud our judgment because we don’t like him.

We're football fans, it's what we do. ?

 

[ChaoticBeaver]

Luckily for us we don’t need to sign people like this. Plenty of talent out there that don’t have horrible attitudes

 

[Nice One Cyril]

Richarlison spends more time on the floor, than my neighbour, and he's a carpet fitter.

 

[Timberwolf]

Would feel like a bit of a Sissoko signing if we got him.

He's not a bad player and would fill a role but would feel extremely underwhelming and would be well overpriced.

Also a LOT less likeable than Sissoko - wouldn't enjoy seeing Richarlison in a Spurs shirt.

 

[worcestersauce]

No

 

[dontcallme]

No, he's just shit & hyped up because he's Brazilian.

Watford = 38 PL games, 5 goals (5 goals in 41 total appearances)

Everton = 35 PL games, 13 goals. (14 goals in 38 total appearances)

35 PL games, 13 goals. (15 goals in 41 total appearances)...

34 PL games, 7 goals (13 goals in 40 total appearances)

29 PL games, 9 goals (10 goals in 32 total appearances.

He's basically a goal every 4 games, despite being "the main man" at each of his clubs.

He's a sulking, petulant twat who wilts as soon as things aren't going his way.

Upwards of £40M for that? I don't think so!

If we can't find better value, better goals to game ratios, and better personalities for that fee, we may as well just call it a day!

I think shit is harsh. Around 1 in 3 for an inside forward is not too bad, especially for a player who'd be backup here.

I'm not sure I could enjoy watching his cheating and petulance every game. His fee would be way too high for what he'd offer.

But for ability and position he's not that bad an option.

 

[ebzrascal]

Fuck no. As well as being a total arse he’s not very good. I think the fact he plays for Brazil distorts people’s perception of him. This is a weak pool of Brazilian players, as much as I like Emerson as a character and think he is improving, his presence in it tells you that.

please explain why you think he is not a good player?

Richarlison is a handful in every game he plays.. is very quick, great engine, disrupts defences, scores goals including 13 goals twice... is at a good age (25) can play wide or down the middle.. proven premier league and probably would be affordable, would be perfect for our squad under a manager like Conte to replace players like Bergwijn and Lucas who need to be upgraded..

We don't need this utter mug at our football club.

Not convinced he is materially better than Lucas, to say nothing of Kulusevski.

I really do not get posts like this he is an upgrade on Lucas no question about that.. regarding Kulu lets wait and see he as the test will be next season when opposition are more aware of him..

stats..
Lucas 19 league goals 14 assists in 136 games and Richarlison 47 goals 16 assists in 172 games plus he has played for worse teams and is 4 years younger..

I think that output would improve a lot under Conte..

 

[ebzrascal]

No, he's just shit & hyped up because he's Brazilian.

Watford = 38 PL games, 5 goals (5 goals in 41 total appearances)

Everton = 35 PL games, 13 goals. (14 goals in 38 total appearances)

35 PL games, 13 goals. (15 goals in 41 total appearances)...

34 PL games, 7 goals (13 goals in 40 total appearances)

29 PL games, 9 goals (10 goals in 32 total appearances.

He's basically a goal every 4 games, despite being "the main man" at each of his clubs.

He's a sulking, petulant twat who wilts as soon as things aren't going his way.

Upwards of £40M for that? I don't think so!

If we can't find better value, better goals to game ratios, and better personalities for that fee, we may as well just call it a day!

At Watford he was like 20 years old so probably show not count that too much..

For Everton 42 goals in 142 games and only 25 is similar numbers to Sonny at that age .. can still improve a lot on his finishing and he is not the main striker.. works hard and is quick would be great squad player in a good team in my view 5 subs and probable champions league next year we need this kind of depth.. improves on Lucas and Birgwijn both of which I would sell

 

[thecook]

It would continue our trend of signing the most non-Brazilian Brazilians though..

 

[Mediocrates]

please explain why you think he is not a good player?

Richarlison is a handful in every game he plays.. is very quick, great engine, disrupts defences, scores goals including 13 goals twice... is at a good age (25) can play wide or down the middle.. proven premier league and probably would be affordable, would be perfect for our squad under a manager like Conte to replace players like Bergwijn and Lucas who need to be upgraded..

I really do not get posts like this he is an upgrade on Lucas no question about that.. regarding Kulu lets wait and see he as the test will be next season when opposition are more aware of him..

stats..
Lucas 19 league goals 14 assists in 136 games and Richarlison 47 goals 16 assists in 172 games plus he has played for worse teams and is 4 years younger..

I think that output would improve a lot under Conte..

Ok. I have watched Everton a lot over the last few seasons as my brother in law is a fan.

Because he isn’t very quick, because has has a heavy touch, because he is always moaning, because he would expect to start and would want wages far higher than his value to the squad.

His best attributes are his aerial ability and his engine. He has poor technique, and a shit attitude.

Im confused as to how you got the impression that he was ‘very quick’.

 

[Dunc2610]

Stinky attitude, its a no from me!

 

[CoopsieDeadpool]

I think shit is harsh. Around 1 in 3 for an inside forward is not too bad, especially for a player who'd be backup here.

I'm not sure I could enjoy watching his cheating and petulance every game. His fee would be way too high for what he'd offer.

But for ability and position he's not that bad an option.

Happy to be harsh.

The guy is a ****, pure and simple. I can't think of anyone more anti what Conte demands from his players.

Conte isn't looking for players who sulk & cry when things aren't going their way. He's wanting players who will fight for each other & build something meaningful.

If Conte wants Richarlison, fine.

I just don't see a world where such a **** & Conte could coexist. In fact, i can literally picture Conte bouncing the **** round the training ground after his first strop.

 

[dontcallme]

Happy to be harsh.

The guy is a ****, pure and simple. I can't think of anyone more anti what Conte demands from his players.

Conte isn't looking for players who sulk & cry when things aren't going their way. He's wanting players who will fight for each other & build something meaningful.

If Conte wants Richarlison, fine.

I just don't see a world where such a **** & Conte could coexist. In fact, i can literally picture Conte bouncing the **** round the training ground after his first strop.

I certainly agree that his on pitch actions and attitude aren't what we want.

If you want to say he's a shit person, fine. I just don't agree that he's a shit player.

 

[CoopsieDeadpool]

I certainly agree that his on pitch actions and attitude aren't what we want.

If you want to say he's a shit person, fine. I just don't agree that he's a shit player.

OK.

Replace "shit" with "inconsistent" (people have the audacity to call Son streaky, yet think this guy could be a good alternative ?), "petulant", "Over hyped".

That's as kind as I'm likely to get with this link, mate.