Every single player gets beaten in duels. So Aaronson beats him to the ball for their first goal. Fair play. Countless other times he wins the ball in this fashion. And for sure he gets beaten other times too. The point is every player loses battles, and I don’t particularly think Pierre does so at a higher rate than others. Also such a niche aspect of the game to pick holes in when his role in the team is to engage in duels off the ball and be a more combative member of the team, as is the job of a midfielder generally in every team in the world. For me I see his biggest weaknesses as his short-distance burst and his agility. But anyway he possesses so much else that your ordinary midfielder doesn’t, which I’ve already said in my first post and overwhelmingly negates his flaws.I agree he has a some good qualities and does give his best.
If you watch the highlights of the games against Liverpool and Leeds you can see him trying to nip infront of the opposition and getting turned. This then leads to goals conceded.
This is ok in a three man midfield but when it’s a two and the other midfielder isn’t a defensive one then it’s killer.
I’d argue it’s a vital aspect of playing in a two man midfield. Trying to intercept infront of your opposing player is a risky move and if you get it wrong then you can easily lead to conceding as shown in both opening goals against Liverpool and Leeds.Every single player gets beaten in duels. So Aaronson beats him to the ball for their first goal. Fair play. Countless other times he wins the ball in this fashion. And for sure he gets beaten other times too. The point is every player loses battles, and I don’t particularly think Pierre does so at a higher rate than others. Also such a niche aspect of the game to pick holes in when his role in the team is to engage in duels off the ball and be a more combative member of the team, as is the job of a midfielder generally in every team in the world. For me I see his biggest weaknesses as his short-distance burst and his agility. But anyway he possesses so much else that your ordinary midfielder doesn’t, which I’ve already said in my first post and overwhelmingly negates his flaws.
Isn't that also the point of having three ar the back though? That someone's always supposed to be ready to step up and assist?I’d argue it’s a vital aspect of playing in a two man midfield. Trying to intercept infront of your opposing player is a risky move and if you get it wrong then you can easily lead to conceding as shown in both opening goals against Liverpool and Leeds.
Slash’s first honestly doesn’t even come in the same phase of play as Pierre losing a duel. And we had 3 in midfield anyway if we wanna go back to your original point. The other two midfielders should be there to cover a la your original point. But that’s just not how football works most of the time. Cause and effect is so subjective it’s almost pointless debating it. He loses duels. So does every single player. He doesn’t do it at a significantly higher rate than most other players in his position. He doesn’t act with significantly more risk than other players in his position. His tendencies on the pitch don’t put the team in danger anymore than other players in his position. And he’s been elite as part of a two man midfield for almost a year now and formed a fantastic partnership/understanding with Bentancur that makes both individuals and the duo together irreplaceable.I’d argue it’s a vital aspect of playing in a two man midfield. Trying to intercept infront of your opposing player is a risky move and if you get it wrong then you can easily lead to conceding as shown in both opening goals against Liverpool and Leeds.
Slash’s first honestly doesn’t even come in the same phase of play as Pierre losing a duel. And we had 3 in midfield anyway if we wanna go back to your original point. The other two midfielders should be there to cover a la your original point. But that’s just not how football works most of the time. Cause and effect is so subjective it’s almost pointless debating it. He loses duels. So does every single player. He doesn’t do it at a significantly higher rate than most other players in his position. He doesn’t act with significantly more risk than other players in his position. His tendencies on the pitch don’t put the team in danger anymore than other players in his position. And he’s been elite as part of a two man midfield for almost a year now and formed a fantastic partnership/understanding with Bentancur that makes both individuals and the duo together irreplaceable.
In our last 6 premier league games we’ve conceded.Isn't that also the point of having three ar the back though? That someone's always supposed to be ready to step up and assist?
Is it not possible to discuss strengths and weaknesses of a player on a forum? Why does everything have to be so binary on the internet, it's just a bloody debate.Yay, yet another "shit on the Tottenham player" thread gathers pace days after an exciting win... ?
In our last 6 premier league games we’ve conceded.
3 goals to Leeds
2 to Forest
2 to Liverpool
2 to Bournemouth
2 to Newcastle
2 to Man Utd
I understand we can blame the defence but games are won in midfield and this record indicates that opposing teams are able to get at our defence too easily.
Is it not possible to discuss strengths and weaknesses of a player on a forum? Why does everything have to be so binary on the internet, it's just a bloody debate.
I agree with everything you said aside from the 'needs upgrading' part.Love the guy as a person and as a personality and squad member and leader and he is a solid 6-7/10 player every week but do I get the same sense of wow what a player he is compared to when I see Bentancur play or when we used to see the likes of Modric, Dembele, Wanyama, Carrick etc? Nope for me he is another that ultimately needs upgrading on in terms of a starting first XI player but really I think eventually the best 2 will be Bissouma and Bentancur but I can see why PEH & Bentancur have been picked as 1st choice most of this season because of their partnership last season and for the most part being a reliable duo.
Yep he is not Rodri and thats why he plays for us and not a better team.The Jermaine Defoe of midfielders. Looks very good 70-80% of the time but when he’s faced with playing the top players his limitations are clear as day. He goes to shit when teams are in our face and play at a high tempo, both on and off the ball. He’s often unable to play out under pressure because he has no burst of pace or agility to make space for himself and his touch often being poor under pressure only exasperates this. Seen him chase shadows against the top sides and sides that bring the game to us far too often for talk of him being elite to seem anything other than ridiculous. He’s a 7 out of 10 player at this level, which is good, but elite? Absolutely not a chance
Maybe get some perspective. This is a football forum.Yay, yet another "shit on the Tottenham player" thread gathers pace days after an exciting win... ?
I’m hardly part of a hardcore bunch. I’ve hardly posted on the forum in the last year.Of course it is, that's why I've been on SC for so long!
Just seems to be a hardcore bunch who spend most of their time mentioning players' weaknesses almost daily.
Must miss their posts about our players' strengths! ??