- Aug 31, 2012
- 18,622
- 64,430
Also they can and have played together in the past so there is no reason for it to be an ether/or situation.After watching them both in the U20s World Cup for England, I'd have assumed it was the opposite way round.
Also they can and have played together in the past so there is no reason for it to be an ether/or situation.After watching them both in the U20s World Cup for England, I'd have assumed it was the opposite way round.
Scott is a terrific young player. Will definitely be playing in the Prem next season.After watching them both in the U20s World Cup for England, I'd have assumed it was the opposite way round.
I'm not even sure we should put the money down for Kulu tbh. On form? Sharp? Not last season, with only one or two exceptions. Let him go back to Turin and sign Olise instead.I don’t see the point in signing Maddison. I’d rather play Kulusevski as an attacking 8, he works harder, holds the ball under pressure better and when he’s on form has a similar level of end product, if not better. Would make far more sense to me to bring Kulu inside and spend that 50m on a real handful of a winger with pace and trickery so we’re adding something to the 11 that we’re lacking.
Why are people concerned about his age? He’s 26! Hardly over the hill, and more like just coming into his prime.
Hopefully for usScott is a terrific young player. Will definitely be playing in the Prem next season.
I suppose it depends on our budget, we have more pressing needs in defence.I cant really understand people. Looking at what he brings every season. For that level of return, in this market, 50m is bang on the money. I hope we do it. Would be great for us
loads of interest including Man City.Hopefully for us
exactly thisI cant really understand people. Looking at what he brings every season. For that level of return, in this market, 50m is bang on the money. I hope we do it. Would be great for us
i would love JM but just don't see us beating off the competition. My assumption was that would be Newcastle............interesting that City are involvedloads of interest including Man City.
Think Trix is referring to Alex Scott capturing the interest of Cityi would love JM but just don't see us beating off the competition. My assumption was that would be Newcastle............interesting that City are involved
The amount of times I’ve seen people throw out the line that there are better/cheaper options is insane… there aren’t. Wanting Alex Scott over James Maddison? Absurd.I feel like I'm from a parallel universe as the only person to think he'd be brilliant for us.
ah yes! ignore me!!Think Trix is referring to Alex Scott capturing the interest of City
we paid 30m for Sissoko thoughA lot of fans are still obsessed with “potential” and “higher ceiling” etc, when there is a PL proven player as you say coming into his peak who solves a huge need in our squad.
It’s an absolute no brainer imo, but it won’t happen if Leicester insist on a high price.
Levy simply won’t entertain paying that for a player with a year left from a team that’s been relegated….. and it will be our loss as someone else will benefit.
If we cannot compete for the young players, especially for those are the Tottenham fans, I don't know what to say.loads of interest including Man City.
Surely with Ange we could give him a path to the first team, essentially straight away. He is a spurs fan and is good friend with Devine judging by the England u-21s.If we cannot compete for the young players, especially for those are the Tottenham fans, I don't know what to say.
Well that’s disappointing and completely unsurprising. I know he’s a spurs fan but that only goes so far.loads of interest including Man City.
loads of interest including Man City.