- Mar 18, 2005
- 34,378
- 83,765
Good post.So much of the criticism this guy gets seem to come from the idea that good wingers should solely be defined by their pace and ability to attack the byline.
He helps us control the game and build our attack from the wing, holding up the ball and contributing massively with key passes. While also running his ass off for us.
I agree he needs to be more productive, but it really annoys me when his contributions gets boiled down to "he works hard, but" all the time. That's a really one dimensional way of assessing his role in the team, and failing to see his contributions.
I loved our second goal yesterday with Johnson heading it through then bursting into the box to assist Son.
I think a lot of the frustration with Kulu is he regularly gets the ball deep in space for a counter but he doesn’t have the pace to make something happen on his own.
But we shouldn’t be judging him solely on that. When teams are deep, it’s often Kulu’s ability to turn in tight spaces and pick out a pass that we often rely on.
If we only have pacy wingers, teams will simply setup accordingly. Kulusevski has areas to work on but he’s important to our team.
Last edited: