- Jul 5, 2004
- 7,887
- 11,723
I love that goal so much.
Let’s hope he does that against the Goons today ?
I love that goal so much.
Let’s hope he does that against the Goons today ?
Danny went live on a Q&A on Instagram
“Government is saying ‘bring football back’ because it is going to boost the nation’s morale. I don’t give a fuck about the nation’s morale, bro, people’s lives are at risk,” he said.
“Football shouldn’t even be spoke about coming back until the numbers [infected or dying] have dropped massively. It’s bollocks.”
I got to agree with old Danny Boy. It's bollocks to be having the discussion that it could boost the nation's moral to have football back soon.
Danny Rose and Raheem Sterling reveal doubts about football's return to action
Both players were speaking on their social media channels about the top flight’s restart, pencilled in for Junewww.theguardian.com
Yeah. The “behind closed doors” line is tacitly agreeing that match day revenue isn't anywhere near as important as TV revenue.Agreed - let's face it - it's about money, not about moral.
All for them bringing it back if they can formulate a safe way to do so but at the moment it's not a priority and the numbers don't seem to support bringing back team contact sports at this stage. Even behind closed doors.
This seems a very naive or selfish response. The delay in getting results or alternatively the resources needed to get timely results would either put people at unnecessary risk or remove the focus from those front line workers who need help and protection most.I dont see a problem with it if the players are being tested. If anything they're less at risk than anyone who goes out and isn't being tested.
What delay in results? They get tested every few days and the results will come through quickly enough to isolate anyone who tests positive. They did it in UFC, a fighter and 2 of his coaches tested positive so they got taken into isolation and taken off the card. The rest of the card continued without them.This seems a very naive or selfish response. The delay in getting results or alternatively the resources needed to get timely results would either put people at unnecessary risk or remove the focus from those front line workers who need help and protection most.
absolutely no reason why any commentators need to mix with anyone else other than themselves. The camera men are dotted around the pitch and they mainly have cameras fixed around the ground. Don’t they have permanent ones that whizz across wires overhead?One has to take into consideration the amount of people, "essential staff", needed to organise and run these " behind closed doors" matches.
One Championship club has given ESPN a full rundown of the minimum number of people it would expect at a game behind closed doors, and it amounts to 166. In the Premier League, rights-holder media alone would see that number leap toward 300.
A top-flight club source told ESPN that an average of 120 broadcast media are accredited for home games. The people you don't see -- riggers, electricians, technicians, producers, camera crew and sound engineers -- are just as important, if not more so, as the reporter or commentator; they will all need to be inside a stadium once football gets the green light to resume.
That's the figures for inside the stadium.
One year left on his contract. Surely we're not gonna get any more than a packet of Space Raiders for him. Getting him off the wage bill should be considered a success.
Take either and just be fucking shot of himThese Space Raiders... Pickled onion or Beef. ??