What has he done wrong but tell the truth?Let him fucking rot. I'd rather stick an out of form Jan out there than have him play anyday so with Jan, Davies and Sess (wingback) we have plenty of cover
Danny Rose is no disruptive influence in the changing room etc. He is highly loved and liked by the players. He always tells it as it is. Wasn’t Poch who wanted him gone! Neither was it the players!
Before you start slagging me off! The bosses know what I share PRIVATELY!!! And as I said on few occasions, if a story breaks that I/we were aware of in private, I confirm or deny it! And that is for a very good reason. So before you start spouting off, be aware of this.Oh here he goes. Jumping on the bandwagon as per usual. Why do you always wait for news to break in the press before expressing your supposed knowledge on situations at Spurs? You never mentioned this before when we were all discussing Rose
What has he done wrong but tell the truth?
Poch never wanted him to leave! I got more respect for players that tell it as it is, rather than those that say one thing to fans and press, and another behind closed doors ?
Danny Rose is no disruptive influence in the changing room etc. He is highly loved and liked by the players. He always tells it as it is. Wasn’t Poch who wanted him gone! Neither was it the players!
Nobody is interested in seeing you pick a fight with somebody called Hercules.Oh here he goes. Jumping on the bandwagon as per usual. Why do you always wait for news to break in the press before expressing your supposed knowledge on situations at Spurs? You never mentioned this before when we were all discussing Rose
He has every right to see out his contract just like any of us have in our jobs.
BRILLIANT!!!Interesting to see so many reactions saying a version of Rose should rot.
No he shouldn't. He is neither professionally nor morally obliged to be sold on Levy's command.
He has a contract with the club, a contract that was freely entered into by both parties, and
his right is to see it through if he wants to. You cannot seriously wish to demote a player just because he doesn't want to be sold.
And then when a player does want to be sold, that's wrong to and posters criticise his loyalty. Let Rose have his contract, play footie, and let Levy not fetch his sell on fee. If players leave on a free after running down their contracts, that mismanagement by the directors, not misconduct by the players.
Before you start slagging me off! The bosses know what I share PRIVATELY!!! And as I said on few occasions, if a story breaks that I/we were aware of in private, I confirm or deny it! And that is for a very good reason. So before you start spouting off, be aware of this.
I have no issue if Rose wants to run his contract down. But I do have an issue with him constantly trying to make my football club look stupid. I also think levy wanting to cash in on a declining 29 year old was perfectly reasonable giving us £20m towards a new LB.
I think this is part of the new movement of football. The amount of money in the game changed everything.Interesting to see so many reactions saying a version of Rose should rot.
No he shouldn't. He is neither professionally nor morally obliged to be sold on Levy's command.
He has a contract with the club, a contract that was freely entered into by both parties, and
his right is to see it through if he wants to. You cannot seriously wish to demote a player just because he doesn't want to be sold.
And then when a player does want to be sold, that's wrong too and posters criticise his loyalty. Let Rose have his contract, play footie, and let Levy not fetch his sell on fee. If players leave on a free after running down their contracts, that mismanagement by the directors, not misconduct by the players.