What's new

Olivier Giroud

daveduvet

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2008
5,624
15,285
I always cheered when the arse or Chelsea brought Giroud on - cos he’s shite; akin to going to ten men. Course he’s gonna get goals every now and then. I’d rather play Dele in Kane’s role than have this arse-wipe
 

Hercules

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2014
5,720
156,738
Now a proven WC winner, with PROVEN track record is ‘agenda shit’. Because he played for two of our rivals. You may not like that fact, but he is not a bad player!
 

WiganSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
16,026
32,758
I don't see how his ability is relevant because it's not going to happen anyway
 

freeeki

Arsehole.
Aug 5, 2008
11,842
69,515
Now a proven WC winner, with PROVEN track record is ‘agenda shit’. Because he played for two of our rivals. You may not like that fact, but he is not a bad player!

Exactly.

Still getting selected for France every game, and still banging them in - while playing in front of Lloris, Sissoko and Ndombele.

I don't care if it's against lesser national sides, France are the world champions, and if he's good enough for them, he's good enough for us.
 

stormfly

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2006
4,617
12,090
Did you know he would be the first player since Gallas to play for Spurs, Arsenal and Chelsea.
 

Danfunkel

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2013
1,814
5,847
Honestly do not see the Issue with this at all. Obviously, everyone wants a top quality CF, but it won’t happen in A) January and B) whilst Kane is at the club.

Dont care who’s he played for. He can score goals. If it’s a choice of him or no one, then getting him in for a season might just be what we need to finish in the top 4. Get over who he’s previously played for, because its irrelevant.
 

dondo

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2006
8,603
14,091
I always cheered when the arse or Chelsea brought Giroud on - cos he’s shite; akin to going to ten men. Course he’s gonna get goals every now and then. I’d rather play Dele in Kane’s role than have this arse-wipe

I can remember 2 times he has scored against us and I always thought he was a good substitute to bring on if I’m being honest
 

matty74

Well-Known Member
Aug 21, 2013
1,297
3,409
Now a proven WC winner, with PROVEN track record is ‘agenda shit’. Because he played for two of our rivals. You may not like that fact, but he is not a bad player!
I would drive him across London myself if it meant getting a striker in this window. Otherwise the melt down on here will be in overdrive and more importantly if he scored a few goals and maybe just maybe we might have a decent rest of the season and win a domestic cup and not fizzle out of the top 4.

Then the meltdown on AFTV and Chelsea would be priceless better than sex
 

muppetman

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2011
9,076
25,329
I would drive him across London myself if it meant getting a striker in this window. Otherwise the melt down on here will be in overdrive and more importantly if he scored a few goals and maybe just maybe we might have a decent rest of the season and win a domestic cup and not fizzle out of the top 4.

Then the meltdown on AFTV and Chelsea would be priceless better than sex
Alternative version is that they piss themselves laughing because they know full well he is way past his best?

This just makes no sense to me from a Chelsea perspective unless he is waaaaaay past it or a bad influence - with Abraham out why would they let him go and to a possible top 4 rival?
 
D

Deleted member 27995


RIEIgTZMuKgkknm8sp1sOG7oRLYHep5QKyMAYK06Dp6UyZOKfZ9UaBKK0K58v1ROET1QKCuCEjXwSgI-qPNEigMNuufHjJp5m-D2IEwXgIhBd9kL6HK0IsEYsgu0-Io0QNtgog
 

daveduvet

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2008
5,624
15,285
I can remember 2 times he has scored against us and I always thought he was a good substitute to bring on if I’m being honest
Fair enough. Beauty of difference of opinion. Genuinely happy to have my POV changed of it was to happen.
 
Top