- Mar 4, 2021
- 15,240
- 70,968
Frank would be a solid, unexciting pick.
Problem for him is that he wouldn't be a popular choice and if he didn't start strongly or get immediate results, he wouldn't have attractive football or a history or trophies to fall back on to appease the fans. I think he could do quite well here given time, but after 4 years of watching shite-ball, the fans will be on a very short fuse if the football's not good and that alone could do for him.
I do think that, unlike Nuno, his charisma would buy him some time though. He's a very eloquent, likeable guy and I think the fan-base would warm to him on that level unlike Nuno who was about as charming as a trout with halitosis.
Yeah if the idea's to bring in Frank and tell him:I don’t think anyone doubts he’s a good manager, in fact most people on here are pretty positive of him. But like you say essentially hiring him would be the same as hiring Nuno in the sense it would be tactically based on a way he used to play in the past not what he plays now. If it was a choice between Frank and Glasner say then yes I would go Frank but in reality there are many different options out there. Considering he primarily plays long ball football we shouldn’t assume that he will change and even if he did change that his style of football would actually work.
Personally I think we need to look for a manager that tactically fits exactly what we want now rather then hoping he can change to fit once he’s here. I personally really can’t deal with anymore long ball football and if you look around the top leagues in Europe not many, if any, play that style of system.
I was thinking this was a cryptic showing the second bomb, Fat Man. Sam Allardyce?Well, its either blow it all up, or shrooms.
I'm good either way.
Both?Well, its either blow it all up, or shrooms.
I'm good either way.
No excuse for putting random parrallel lines, barcodes, different shades of boxes and circles all over the shirt. What a nightmare. Design team on acid.Not that I like/dislike. I cannot recall a time when SC judges been happy with the home shirts under Nike. So they may as well do what they want.
Spot on.Frank would be a solid, unexciting pick.
Problem for him is that he wouldn't be a popular choice and if he didn't start strongly or get immediate results, he wouldn't have attractive football or a history or trophies to fall back on to appease the fans. I think he could do quite well here given time, but after 4 years of watching shite-ball, the fans will be on a very short fuse if the football's not good and that alone could do for him.
I do think that, unlike Nuno, his charisma would buy him some time though. He's a very eloquent, likeable guy and I think the fan-base would warm to him on that level unlike Nuno who was about as charming as a trout with halitosis.
He 100% plays great football and again we dont have the players for it but if I remember peps first season in the prem didnt he have the players squad to do it and even though they started like a house on fire they ended up finishing 3rd behind us. City perserved and now they have one of the best teams on the planet. Would we be so accomodating. 2 bad results we will be on his back
Add Ralf Rangnick in a DOF and you’ve got a structure with a plan.My opinion on what Levy should do has been pretty set since about January:
- Fire Conte
- Fire Paratici (he’s done very well by all accounts on transfers, scouting set up and development squad signings, but the stuff looming over him in Italy and his clear preference for pragmatic coaches is my reason for getting rid)
- Throw the bag at Paul Barber to come and be the Head Of Football operations.
- Let Barber have complete control of all the football side and let him pick the new manager for the summer. Whoever he picks, I’ll be on board with as he seems, being a spurs fan himself, to get what we want in attacking football.
Will never happen in a million years, but I’d be over the moon with the above.
I do think that man management is often overlooked - but I disagree with the premise that we need a tactically adaptable manager.
If you want to improve as a squad - you need direction. You need to know where, and why, you need to improve certain positions. If you simply take the approach of "I'll just make what's in the fridge" then you will be mired in mediocrity - and have no plan for improvement.
Take the current flavor of the month - Arteta. He has always known how he wanted to play - and was willing to wait for the club to deliver the players he needed in specific positions. It was not about adaptability, it was about knowing how he wanted to play tactically, so that he could then identify the players needed.
This, of course, requires patience, which is in short supply at the club. I worry that too many people just assume that a new manager, or a new approach can turn players into something they are not. Who ever we bring in, should have a plan - in concert with a DOF - and then we should start - again - at building a squad in that vision. But, its a recipe for disaster if we expect a manager to simply turn existing players into something else...
Agreed, but worth mentioning Frank changed to more direct football to keep Brentford up. It does suggest at least an adaptable manager. Plus they just went on a 12 game unbeaten run, so it may be a case of don’t fix what isn’t broke.
You make it sound like that would be too much to expect...Surely he should just adapt his philosophy to fit the players we have.
Enrique please. No more Chelsea slagsGlad you're now saying Tuchel is in the running as I remember when I first mentioned he was near the top of our list, you said you didn't think he was. I've consistently been given two names, that doesn't mean there aren't others as of course there will be, but Tuchel and Enrique are the only names that have been consistently said to me.
Re what Dragon has said re people lying if they think they know who the next manager will be or what the plan is, unless I've missed something, I don't believe anybody has committed to saying who the next manager is or what the plan is.