Alright miserable mabel, suns shining outside, go get some vitamin D.No.
We need to stop living in the past. He’s not Poch.
BAP BAP AustralianoI liked Jol's abbreviation (BMJ) but Ange's would be much better (BAP)
Udogie will be okay as he's played CM before although he is much better wide, Porro I think will struggle tho. TBH both players strengths are very much in attack and we would not be making the most of their strengths if we invert them. Personally this is one of the things that concerns me about going for Ange in that we just don't have the players to fit his tactics. Enrique at least likes his full backs to sit high and wide like wingers which would suit them perfectly.It was my concern with Slot too.
Could Porro be converted? He is certainly good on the ball. No idea about Udogie.
I mean I do, but I live in Cumbria and can see Dumfries from my window. I also wouldn’t listen to a thing they said as they all spout shit to a manIf there is going to be a new poll, I think we need to know how many SCers have Celtic supporting mates.
Make it sound it like we are too good for this Celtic bloke makes us sound like we believe in our exceptionalismCan someone explain why we are too good for this Celtic bloke?
Can someone explain why we are too good for this Celtic bloke?
You can either say you want a manager who attacks or you can say you want Emery/Lopetegui.You have one of the best strikers in the world and instead of getting a top attacking manager, we are taking an unnecessary gamble on someone whose experience is mainly in Japan and Australia. But he's a top bloke who does good speeches and plays good football.
Im not a Poch fan but the fact we are going for Ange and didn't even approach Poch, with little furore. Is why the club get away with the poor performances with no accountability
Next season in terms of CV's and Experience, imo Wolves and Aston Villa would both have better managers suited to the PL than us
Did we get worse though or did they over achieve with the players at there disposal ???You can either say you want a manager who attacks or you can say you want Emery/Lopetegui.
And every appointment is a gamble. We know this because we appointed Conte and Mourinho and got worse.
Denzel?I mean I do, but I live in Cumbria and can see Dumfries from my window. I also wouldn’t listen to a thing they said as they all spout shit to a man
Talking about Celtic and Rangers' treble 'achievements' playing in a league where the other teams are;
The Dog and Duck
The Red Lion
The Spread Eagle
The Pig and Whistle
The White Horse
The Mason's Arms
The Plough
The Bell
The Royal Oak
The Kings Arms
I can't understand how we can praise Emery and Lopetegui for what they did in adapting to/with their team and then argue Conte/Mourinho did all they could despite having more money and better players.Did we get worse though or did they over achieve with the players at there disposal ???
I would say going by our form after conte run away suggests they did as well as could be expected even if we hated the snooze fest they served up
Nope. Just a mind numbing repetition of the same rhetoric with fuck-all to back it up.Can someone explain why we are too good for this Celtic bloke?
It's been reported that he wants a long term project, and he's nothing like them in either personality or playing style.
I mean I do, but I live in Cumbria and can see Dumfries from my window. I also wouldn’t listen to a thing they said as they all spout shit to a man
Hang on - didn’t we hear that HK was, if not instrumental, then certainly contributory in Poch getting sacked?Can't help but think appointing Poch would have given us the best chance of keeping Kane.
I don't think that's an unreasonable point - the only thing is that at this stage of his career, does he have an appetite to embark on a new project whoever the coach is?Can't help but think appointing Poch would have given us the best chance of keeping Kane.