What's new

Move to new 80,000 Olympic Stadium back on?

ginola99

Well-Known Member
Sep 4, 2005
683
1,419
Spurs and West Ham bid for new homes as 2012 venues up for grabs
By Sportsmail Reporter

Last updated at 12:09 PM on 05th September 2008
London 2012 chiefs were plunged into a battle over the legacy of the two key Olympic venues.

They are facing a crisis after it emerged that the £525million Olympic stadium may be demolished to build a new venue for a Premier League football club - with Tottenham widely-touted as an interested party.
Meanwhile, the future of the £1billion athletes' village was put into further doubt by the resignation of two key figures from its developer Lend Lease.

Emergency plans for a purpose-built football stadium in the Olympic Park are being drawn up amid concerns that the venue will otherwise become a white elephant.


The London Development Agency may ditch the original plan to convert the 80,000-capacity stadium to an athletics venue holding 25,000 people.

Planners for Mayor Boris Johnson believe it could be cheaper in the long run to build a new stadium in partnership with a football club rather than subsidise its use as a predominantly athletics venue.

That could pave the way for West Ham who are sceptical about moving to a former Parcelforce depot site suggested by the LDA.
West Ham's initial talks with 2012 chiefs about a move to the Olympic stadium broke down two years ago over disagreement about the cost of converting the venue after the Games.

Tottenham Hotspur currently plan to redevelop their own White Hart Lane stadium to boost capacity but sources say they would not rule out a move to Stratford if the price was right.

Mr Johnson is become increasingly concerned that no 'anchor tenant' has come forward to occupy the venue.

Responsibility for making it pay its way has been given to Tom Russell, the LDA director of Olympic legacy, and the man who was a key figure in the building of Manchester City's Eastlands stadium when he was at Manchester City Council.

The issue will be the first major matter dealt with by Johnson's legacy advisory board which is to be launched later this month.

Progress on the £1billion athletes' village was plunged into further doubt this week when Nigel Hugill announced he was resigning as chairman of Lend Lease.

Development director Robin Butler is also going. The troubled Australian firm has struggled to raise its £450 million stake in the project with a deal not expected until later this year.

However, the planners are not looking to change the existing design for the 80,000-seat Olympic Stadium, and have also been told that whatever is there afterwards must have the capability to stage major athletics events.

An LDA spokesperson said: 'The LDA has left no stone unturned in examining all legacy options for the Olympic venues and is still looking at a range of potential sporting uses including athletics, football and rugby for the Olympic stadium.'
Mr Johnson's Olympics watchdog David Ross has warned that the 2012 stadium's cost now is £525million and there would have to be significant private investment into building a completely new stadium after the Games.

London 2012 chiefs have also insisted that having an athletics facility after the Games is non-negotiable because that was one of the promises made to the IOC in the bid.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1052688/Spurs-West-Ham-bid-new-homes-2012-venues-grabs.html
 

nidge

Sand gets everywhere!!!!!
Staff
Jul 27, 2004
24,868
11,368
We can't move into a stadium that has to have the capability to be an athletics stadium as well because unless they have stands that move in and out the fans would be too far away from the pitch and one thing I like about WHL is how close you feel to the action.
 

alextheyid

..can't smile without you...
Dec 13, 2007
1,440
2
oh behave..this thread's on the main page..and ita an ongoing saga we all hope is quashed!
 

si_yidarmy

£NIC OUT
Apr 17, 2005
4,717
931
this is just as bad as the transfer window. If it was true then it should be on the official site!
 

InOffMeLeftShin

Night watchman
Admin
Jan 14, 2004
15,105
9,122
They are facing a crisis after it emerged that the £525million Olympic stadium may be demolished to build a new venue for a Premier League football club - with Tottenham widely-touted as an interested party.


Emergency plans for a purpose-built football stadium in the Olympic Park are being drawn up amid concerns that the venue will otherwise become a white elephant.

I'm fairly sure it means just the site and not actually moving into the stadium. Anyway I highly doubt that will happen.
 

si_yidarmy

£NIC OUT
Apr 17, 2005
4,717
931
we could have a stadium built by the time they put thiers up and demolish it... your looking at atleast the year 2015 before near completion!!!

Stick to local, it will be quicker and keeps our tradition of NORTH LONDON
 

ginola99

Well-Known Member
Sep 4, 2005
683
1,419
There are many options, as I've heard the club state before. It must hard to find what is best and with the housing market going into a state of decline it's hard to find other ways of funding the stadium whilst continuing the spending that we enjoy. You could rebuild the west and east stands, connecting to the two teirs and excutive boxes of the Paxton and Park Lane, also the second teir be the same size as the Paxton, which is bigger than that of the PL 2nd teir, then add a small "club level" teir on top of that, thus having three teirs around the pitch, then had a big fourth to the west stand, possibly fill part of the North West and South West corners like that of St, Jakob's stadiuim. It would make sure there is no worry about the space behind and you'll be able to get up to 55,000 at least, but I'm no architect.
 

fazza

Well-Known Member
May 5, 2004
17,285
490
No thanks, would rather stay close to Tottenham at least. Wingate or redevloping the current ground is surely the best option
 

Yid-ol

Just-outside Edinburgh
Jan 16, 2006
31,182
19,429
We can't move into a stadium that has to have the capability to be an athletics stadium as well because unless they have stands that move in and out the fans would be too far away from the pitch and one thing I like about WHL is how close you feel to the action.

yep, i agree, fans need to be close to the pitch!! only other way it woudl work is if they are able to lower the level of the pitch/track and have stands that can fold in and out into the new space? but that may well be too tecnical to be done
 
Dec 8, 2005
948
0
We can't move into a stadium that has to have the capability to be an athletics stadium as well because unless they have stands that move in and out the fans would be too far away from the pitch and one thing I like about WHL is how close you feel to the action.

:clap:
 

Bristol Coys

New Member
Aug 5, 2008
753
5
yep, i agree, fans need to be close to the pitch!! only other way it would work is if they are able to lower the level of the pitch/track and have stands that can fold in and out into the new space? but that may well be too technical to be done

Yes it is essential not to have dead space of a running track, but if their was a raised platform for athletics and removable seating we could have both.

A major advantage would be the improved infra structure that the Olympic arena would have built for the games. Lets face it 60k stadium at the Lane would be a nightmare for transport and the council LTA will never build US a tube station.

Eastlands looks fine to me. I was really upset about losing the shelf, with that distinctive feature gone, am I bothered whether it moves a couple of miles?

If they are looking for volunteers, I'd bring my own sledgehammer to help with the East stand boxes. 80000 all seater stadium would put us right up there and I believe we would get 65k average.
 

General Levy

Banned
Jun 7, 2007
4,295
9
:pray: for this to be true.

Obviously, the lower seats would be able to temporary make way for a track similar to the Stade de Francais.
 

Bobishism

*****istrator
Aug 23, 2004
15,035
126
We can't move into a stadium that has to have the capability to be an athletics stadium as well because unless they have stands that move in and out the fans would be too far away from the pitch and one thing I like about WHL is how close you feel to the action.

Yeah, cause that'll really stop the management buying a cheap stadium.
 

Bristol Coys

New Member
Aug 5, 2008
753
5
FAR AWAY?
I have to come up the M4 these days to see the Lillywhites. Its quicker (and easier to get a ticket) to see Spurs in Brum! ;-)
 

InOffMeLeftShin

Night watchman
Admin
Jan 14, 2004
15,105
9,122
Again, the article says that they are considering demolishing the olympic stadium and building a custom made football stadium on that land. The only question is whether we want to move there. The pros are that there will be existing transport networks etc. The cons are just about everything else.

There is no mention of playing with a running track. Why would a custom made football stadium have a running track?
 

nickspurs

SC Supporter
May 13, 2005
1,608
1,389
Guys, it's the Mail. They're just monkeys who make stuff up, there's nothing here. Move along, move along.
 

nightgoat

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2005
24,604
21,898
This story doesn't seem to have much factual basis at all... The circumstances that surrounded the bid haven't significantly changed, so why would there be need to knock the whole Olympic Stadium down, rather than just downsize to 25,000 as planned?

I believe the original plan was for the athlete's village to be sold off as affordable housing as part of the redevelopment of East London scheme, which was an important part of the whole legacy idea that got us the Olympics in the first place... The Olympic Stadium itself probably won't stage that many big athletics events afterwards, but will probably be used for training etc... A purpose built football stadium that would be used every fortnight wouldn't save it from becoming a 'white elephant' anyway...

You can file this under 'Shit! The transfer window's closed, quick, make something up!"
 

SpurSince57

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2006
45,213
8,229
The realisation that the whole thing's going to be a colossal white elephant is hitting home. I'm really looking forward to 2012, because I can rent out my house to some numbfuck who'll pay silly rent whilst I piss off to the Languedoc on the proceeds.

Total joke.
 
Top