Front page of the Observer sports section. Given the Observer's close relations with Jol in the past (eg the Ramosgate off-the-record interview with Jol), I'm pretty sure the "friend of Jol" quoted below is either Martin himself or someone authorized by BMJ to respond to Daniel Levy's claims.
Once again, I'm afraid Levy seems keen to blame everyone but himself.
Once again, I'm afraid Levy seems keen to blame everyone but himself.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2008/nov/02/tottenhamhotspur-premierleagueDaniel Levy has laid blame on Dimitar Berbatov for Tottenham's appalling start to the Premier League season. The Spurs chairman - who accepts only limited responsibility for his part in the sacking of two highly regarded managers in barely a year - says that Berbatov's efforts to engineer his deadline-day transfer to Manchester United unsettled the dressing room and undermined Juande Ramos.
Berbatov was left out of matches against Sunderland and Chelsea that preceded his £30.75m exit after Ramos decided the striker was not 'psychologically fit' - an example, says Levy, of excessive player power. Asked if Berbatov actively went on strike to obtain his transfer, Levy said: 'That's something you're going to have to ask him, but clearly he didn't play for those two games. He didn't play.' At the time Tottenham investigated Berbatov's conduct, but took no sanctions against him.
'I don't think Berbatov treated this club with the respect that we honestly deserved. We put him on the map. I think he's an outstanding player, but he signed a long-term contract with this club and I think he should have stayed. I had so many conversations with him. He kept saying it was about his ambition to play for Manchester United. It wasn't a money issue. We offered him a new contract and he wasn't even interested in discussing it.
'The reality is, in modern football, the players have all the power. It's not just relevant to Tottenham: if players anywhere decide as a group they are not going to play well and they want to get someone sacked then, that's what can happen. But I don't believe our squad made a concerted effort [to depose Ramos].'
However, several members of Spurs' playing staff were known to have lost faith in Ramos before his sacking last Saturday night, complaining of his training methods, team selection and tactics. Levy responded by contacting and appointing Harry Redknapp within the space of 36 hours.
Ramos's dismissal less than a year after his contentious recruitment from Sevilla takes Levy's head count of managers to seven, including caretakers, in his seven years in charge of the club. The chairman insisted that he did not regret sacking Martin Jol last October, despite the Dutchman's record of consecutive fifth-place finishes in the League - the club's best in 16 years. Levy, who also accused Jol of contributing to his own demise by discussing an offer to manage Newcastle United, said Jol had final approval on all of the signings made by former sporting director Damien Comolli, and had tried to take one controversial acquisition, the defender Younes Kaboul, to his current club, Hamburg.
A friend of Jol told Observer Sport that the coach had only spoken to Newcastle in an attempt to improve his salary at White Hart Lane, which Levy had refused to increase from £500,000 a year. According to the friend, Jol had raised concerns with Levy about several of Comolli's signings and been knocked back on alternative names; and while Kaboul's agent had attempted to arrange a move to Hamburg, the club had only made a 'joke offer' of a swap deal for teenage defender Miroslav Stepanek. The friend also noted Levy's retreat from demanding a Champions League place to targeting Uefa Cup qualification.
Levy dismisses much of the criticism of his record on appointments. 'Obviously [managers] are a factor, but not the sole factor in terms of winning games. Often it is luck; injuries - all these factors - have an impact on results. It is a very fine line between success and failure.'
Supporters have raised concerns that Levy's direction of the club is more focused on balance-book profit than on-field success with net transfer spends and wages strictly controlled. It is also widely expected that majority shareholder Enic International would sell the club if an appropriate offer was lodged. Plans for a new 60,000-seat stadium adjacent to White Hart Lane increase the club's marketability.
However, Levy said the club has yet to receive an unconditional takeover offer and that football takes precedence over financial matters. He defended a proposed dividend payment of £3.7m - an unusually high figure for a Premier League club. 'It's a sign of a mature and well-run business that a dividend should be paid. We don't consider £3.7m a substantial amount in the context of the size of this club.'
Neither Arsenal nor Chelsea pay a dividend to owners. Enic is an investment vehicle for Joe Lewis, who lives in the Bahamas and has not attended a Tottenham match since buying into the club in 2001. 'We [Enic] are not a charity, but we've invested over £100m in this club so I don't think it's unreasonable we should receive two and a bit million on £100m investment,' Levy added.