What's new

Let's talk the midfield

DEFchenkOE

Well-Known Member
Feb 13, 2006
10,527
8,052
Yep i'm kinda bored at work today. So longish post coming up....

We all know the problem with the strikers, but for some reason I find that despite it being our strongest area on paper something in our midfield just doesn't seem right. I think we've struggled to get the balance right on a number of occassions. While playing a 4-4-2/4-4-1-1 with Bale and Lennon on the wings it seems to leave our central midfield very light against most teams that are now playing 5 in midfield. Especially when we have Modric as one of the players in central midfield who also has instincts to try and get forward, he should be playing a bit further forward imo but often can't due to the wide open spaces this leaves.

Last season we never really cut teams open and often relied on individual briliance for goals. Something we don't do too well is keep the ball for sustained periods in the opposition half, a result of this is we don't create many opportunities against teams that sit back and look to counter. Teams that come at us we seem to have no problem creating chances against. From what I've seen in pre-season and last season I have no reason to believe that we've done anything to work on improving our results against the teams where we need to force things, due to their sitting back. It will again come down to odd moments of magic rather than us moving about their midfield and defence.

Our main tactic most of the time is getting it out to Bale or Lennon and hoping they can beat their man and get a cross in, when this doesn't work (due to them being doubled up on or having a bad game) we tend to pass it about in midfield a bit and then look for Crouch's head.

What do you guys think we need to do to improve this? Maybe we cant compete with the other guys financially but we already have the squad to be able to beat the bottom teams and we should be able to do this but it cannot be a coincidence that we dropped so many points to these teams last season. So many times I've seen the gap between our central midfielders and attackers to be too big.

I think to be successful now playing 4-4-2 you need to really have 2 athletic/physical central midfielders that more or less have the complete all round game. I'm thinking of Petit/Viera or Keane/Ince types. These players could pass, tackle, press, score, and get up and down the pitch at will. I'm thinking that Sandro definitely has the potential and attributes for this, and maybe Diarra would too if we did sign him. So I could see a 4-4-2 with Sandro and Diarra in the centre working but I don't believe the other players we have in the squad are capable. YEs we have seen that Modric is able to play in the middle 2 but I think this takes away from his game somewhat and restricts him.

Is it time that we change system to best accomodate our creative players and not leave us too open? Do we need to move towards a 4-3-1-2 or a 4-3-3? In my opinion we need to do it, and do it soon. More than likely if Modric went to Chelsea he'd play in a midfield 3 and share the attacking/defensive duties with 1 other player and still have another player sitting to give added cover. People always complain that he doesn't score enough but it's often because he's not able to due to the way we play. At Chelsea it would probably be Modric---Mikel---Malouda/Lampard. I don't see why we cannot play Modric---Sandro---VDV, we can push Bale and Lennon further forward against teams that sit deep.

On Saturday I saw us play with Modric and Krancjar in central midfield, good idea imo, only problem was the defensive midfielder was missing! It wasn't even like we had 10 men. I'm almost certain we won't play with Mods and Krancjar as centre mids in a 4-4-2 in any competitive game, it would be suicide. So I cannot see the logic with using this in our last game before the season starts. We have the players to adapt to different systems but we're not trying it, even in pre-season. Personally i'm finding it a bit frustrating and hard to understand. If anything I'd say the way our attacks develop has slowly gone backwards instead of improving. Am I the only one that sees things like this?? :shrug:
 

THOWIG

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2005
6,520
8,417
We have to move to a 433 or play a variation of this.

It will give us more flexibility. In certain games we could play VDV as the right sided forward and in others play him in midfield.

All of our current crop of midfielders are well suited to play in a 3 man midfield.

We just need another defensive minded midfielder, Striker and possibly another right sided player, but that's not as important as the other two positions.
 

leetotty

Member
Mar 14, 2005
190
17
We wont be able to control the ball for long periods of time if we spread our players all over the pitch like we do. We have lennon hugging the right, bale the left, our midfield duo have 45 yards (width wise) to cover between them (and of course the lengthwise gap between the strikers and the defenders too). Controlled Passing with such big gaps between all of our players makes controlled football quite difficult.

On our day when we get the ball quickly to bale and lennon we can expose the defenses quite easily with their pace and ability to beat one man. With a slower build up, Lennon and Bale need to vary their movement coming inside more and then allow the width to come from the full backs.

Also in slow play, when we pass backwards to our defenders with Bale and lennon having already gone wide and now static there seems very little option for the defenders other than to slip a ball into modric (who may make a little run off his midfield marker) or to hit a longer ball up to crouch/pav.

Playing with two wingers is fine to do, but they need to be more varied in their movement and adjust to the situation they are in. Not having that fluidity is where players are either over coached, not allowed to express themselves in the situation they are in or they are techincally not able to adjust their game...I am hoping whatever the reason its remedied this season.
 

$hoguN

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2005
26,672
34,817
We have to move to a 433 or play a variation of this.

It will give us more flexibility. In certain games we could play VDV as the right sided forward and in others play him in midfield.

All of our current crop of midfielders are well suited to play in a 3 man midfield.

We just need another defensive minded midfielder, Striker and possibly another right sided player, but that's not as important as the other two positions.

I agree with the first bit in bold and disagree with the second part as VDV is completely wasted playing on the righthand side as he has no pace, which causes us problems as he likes to drift to get the ball, and then cannot get back out wide quick enough.
 

THOWIG

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2005
6,520
8,417
I agree with the first bit in bold and disagree with the second part as VDV is completely wasted playing on the righthand side as he has no pace, which causes us problems as he likes to drift to get the ball, and then cannot get back out wide quick enough.

I'd prefer him to play in midfield in all honesty, but was just throwing it out there as an option.
 

stemark44

Well-Known Member
Mar 17, 2005
6,598
1,829
After watching yesterdays game it appears that United have learned a hell of a lot from the Barca defeat and have taken on board what they need to do and the brand of football that could pay dividends for them this season.
The second half was as good as I have seen from them and the one touch passing and quick movement was far too much for City............they couldn't get near them.

Quick passing and willing runners with blistering pace will destroy most teams in the world.
There is a lesson there for us too.
 

DEFchenkOE

Well-Known Member
Feb 13, 2006
10,527
8,052
Yea I agree with playing VdV centrally, the majority of teams in Holland seem to play 4-3-3 anyway so he should be used to it. While I'm sure he enjoys playing behind the striker and being able to roam where ever he wants I also think that he can be tactically disciplined if told to be as I've seen him do this for the national team.
 

THOWIG

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2005
6,520
8,417
Yea I agree with playing VdV centrally, the majority of teams in Holland seem to play 4-3-3 anyway so he should be used to it. While I'm sure he enjoys playing behind the striker and being able to roam where ever he wants I also think that he can be tactically disciplined if told to be as I've seen him do this for the national team.

He is also one of our best pressers.
 

mpickard2087

Patient Zero
Jun 13, 2008
21,894
32,582
Pretty much agree with most of what the OP says. Have been banging on about many of the points put forward for I dont know how long.

I would like to see us switch to 4-3-3, this causes more problems though as it requires the wide forwards to chip in with a fair amount of goals which I dont think you can rely on someone like Lennon to do. Solution would be buy someone else or with current personnel have the two wide players as Bale and VDV or Kranjcar, who you know will be most likely to get goals out of.

If we continue along current system of 4-4-1-1 as seems likely, then we really do need to improve our movement off the ball in the final third. In a lot of our games we have possession for long spells but it is unthreatening and played in front of the oppositions defensive line, then like the OP says eventually it goes wide and we have a lack of options so cross it in to the box. Would love to see one of our midfielders take a chance and get ahead of the game and make a run into the box just to give us more options. Also if we do cross it in then the winger on the opposing side needs to be more proactive and make the effort to cut in and reach the far post, both Lennon and Bale could do more to get involved even though the ball is on the opposite flank.
 

bubble07

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2004
23,188
30,352
Yea I agree with playing VdV centrally, the majority of teams in Holland seem to play 4-3-3 anyway so he should be used to it. While I'm sure he enjoys playing behind the striker and being able to roam where ever he wants I also think that he can be tactically disciplined if told to be as I've seen him do this for the national team.

problem is i don't think he can be disciplined. I'd be amazed if Redknapp is happy for him to collect the ball inside our own half time and time again
 

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,367
83,732
I liked how we played when we played Palacios in the centre and Modric on the left. Now Bale has emerged as a first name on the teamsheet player and Modric has played well in the centre I'd keep the formula the same but change the playermaker to the right rather than the left.

Pienaar, Sandro, Modric, Bale.

Good mix of ball players and defensive stability. I don't think playing 442 with two wingers provided the expected service to our strikers and we became too easy to defend against.

With Pienaar on the right I also think think would open up the option to give Walker a go in right back whereas Lennon and Walker would be a bit weak defensively.
 

blitz

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2004
857
334
i mentioned in another thread how i feel 4-3-3 is the way to go for us. it also seems the most likely based on the players we have been linked with

a midfield of diarra modric sandro gives us cover at the back and a link to the forwards

going on rumour, a forward 3 of bale ruiz/lavezzi vdv with all 3 swapping positions, no out and out striker but as a 3 im sure they are capable of scoring a lot and ruiz especially is capable of playing as a forward

ruiz
bale vdv

diarra modric sandro
 

kaz Hirai

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2008
17,692
25,340
we definitely need to be alot less predictable in how we play, it all goes through the wings. and crossing the ball into the box is defensively bread and butter stuff for alot of the bottom teams
 

Dan Ashcroft

Manstack vs The Gay Chimney
Jan 6, 2008
6,404
1,147
For me I'd definitely go 4-2-3-1, probably:

Sandro/Diarra - Modric
Lennon - vdV - Bale

I'd pick a back two of Modric + Sandro, Diarra or Hudd (depending on opposition)

The front 3 picks itself, though with the options of bringing in Modric, Krancjar or Pienaar as well.

Ideally we'll also buy a wide right forward who to maybe start ahead of/compete with Lennon.
 
Top