- Aug 13, 2004
- 26,730
- 22,306
Liverpool have been awarded the Home dressing room at the UCL final rather than Spurs; this is due to "logistical" reasons ... sounds like BS to me
Liverpool have been awarded the Home dressing room at the UCL final rather than Spurs; this is due to "logistical" reasons ... sounds like BS to me
I hate all this, I think I've read/seen 3 or 4 articles/interviews from ex and current players saying they're here to stay, well why don't you get on and do it, and when you have then you can start flapping your gums.
Liverpool have been awarded the Home dressing room at the UCL final rather than Spurs; this is due to "logistical" reasons ... sounds like BS to me
https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/spo...erpool-handed-champions-league-final-16269441
Spur's "home" dressing room:
Liverpool's "away" dressing room
After reading those comments, why are scousers still allowed to breed? You can clearly see why they are detested by the footballing world
Sky Sports main deadline yesterday "Thommo: I'd take Coutinho back to Liverpool".
This was ahead of;
- City winning the league - the aftermath
- Hughton being sacked
- Hazard stating he has told Chelsea his plans
- Bolton have points deducted
How is the opinion of a long-nosed gobshite more headline worthy of any of these other stories?
Exactly. For Sky Sports anything about Liverpool, no matter how forced or trivial, is always a bigger story than anything else going on in the world. It's pathetic.
Bar Utd Liverpool have more fans than anyone else worldwide so they pander to the masses for more clicks to generate revenue.
For example Have a look at these videos and look at the difference in view count for both, same topic but the difference is staggering.
1.2m views
262k views
Their agenda is to make money and they'll do that by generating eye catching headlines which appeal to a worldwide audience who are likely to be deceived by click bait.
You see, this is what pisses me off about the BBC.You're absolutely right. Don't get me wrong I'm aware of why they do it, they're just a trashy click-bait type sports news channel at the end of the day. Doesn't make it any less annoying though. Especially when other, supposedly "serious", news sources are resorting to this kind of click-bait approach nowadays as well. It's not just a SSN problem it's a problem for "journalism" as a whole in the social-media driven age.
You’re nearly two decades behind the times in that view, GB (sadly). The Beeb has been operating as close to the commercial broadcasters operating models as it can since John Birt took over.You see, this is what pisses me off about the BBC.
You expect if prom the commercial media, more clicks = more money, its that simple.
But the BBCs approach in general has always been to produce quality, not to appease the masses, but to focus on quality...they don't have to please any advertisers.
Yet their Sports journalism is some of the most Liverpool leaning shite you can possibly find.
That maybe so mate, but that shouldn't be the case for a corporation funded by the public purse imo.You’re nearly two decades behind the times in that view, GB (sadly). The Beeb has been operating as close to the commercial broadcasters operating models as it can since John Birt took over.
The pursuit of numbers is as cutthroat for them as it is for the rest. More so since the explosion in channels that satellite and cable brought.
Sky Sports main deadline yesterday "Thommo: I'd take Coutinho back to Liverpool".
This was ahead of;
- City winning the league - the aftermath
- Hughton being sacked
- Hazard stating he has told Chelsea his plans
- Bolton have points deducted
How is the opinion of a long-nosed gobshite more headline worthy of any of these other stories?
Absolutely right. It shouldn’t. But the reasons for why they do are too long, complex and political. It’s a crying shame.That maybe so mate, but that shouldn't be the case for a corporation funded by the public purse imo.