Harry Kane

[chas vs dave]

The levy apologists are out in force. Utd dropping 70plus mill on a striker and 60 on an am in the same window without blinking whilst wanting the ownership out. Us selling a generational talent and filling a position we should have signed 3 years ago.

So, you are now comparing us to a club who make a lot more than us?

If people are calm, then they are levy apologists?

Again, its another thread being railroaded into a levy debate.

If we keep kane, and he goes on a free, you'll be the first to talk about how it's amateurish that we've let him go on a free. I get the impression that you talk a lot about how things should be done, what experience do you have in running such organisations?

 

[worcestersauce]

Can Ben Davies fill in as a striker if need be?

He'll give it a bloody good go I'll give him that.

 

[E17yid]

Can Ben Davies fill in as a striker if need be?

Davies actually has a good shot on him. Wish he’d shoot a bit more tbh.

 

[parklane_B39-R16-S25]

Hate the fact that Fabrizio Romano has more info on all of this than the ITK on this forum. The silence is deafening from you guys…have u even got a whisper for us?

 

[neogenisis]

Hate the fact that Fabrizio Romano has more info on all of this than the ITK on this forum. The silence is deafening from you guys…have u even got a whisper for us?

Im not sure there is any ITK about that will make anyone happy and not cause the forum to crash and burn. So I reckon ITK's are keeping their info to themselves.

 

[cjbyid]

Hate the fact that Fabrizio Romano has more info on all of this than the ITK on this forum. The silence is deafening from you guys…have u even got a whisper for us?

Fab has no new information on this. He just uses all the same information but just words it differently everytime he tweets something.

 

[stormfly]

If Kane leaves next year he’ll be 31. If he was 25/26 and was about to leave for free then I’d be concerned. Having Kane here until he’s 31 then leaving on a free feels ok to me. He’s saved us paying 100s of millions on forwards so we’ve recouped the money in my eyes. Plus we get another year of one of the greats.

 

[TheChosenOne]

If Kane leaves next year he’ll be 31. If he was 25/26 and was about to leave for free then I’d be concerned. Having Kane here until he’s 31 then leaving on a free feels ok to me. He’s saved us paying 100s of millions on forwards so we’ve recouped the money in my eyes. Plus we get another year of one of the greats.

It will cost about £20 mill to keep him for the season.

 

[Nebby]

Hate the fact that Fabrizio Romano has more info on all of this than the ITK on this forum. The silence is deafening from you guys…have u even got a whisper for us?

No doubt it helps if you can just make stuff up. And can play the same trick with every club that's out there.

 

[-Afri-Coy-]

Fab has no new information on this. He just uses all the same information but just words it differently everytime he tweets something.

He has to farm that engagement from the morons on Twitter somehow

 

[-Afri-Coy-]

Only thing that concerns me is that we seem to be in a position where we HAVE to sell Kane to sign 2 CB’s that we should’ve been signing regardless of whether he leaves or not.

How can a club of our size and stature still be in a financial state where we need to sell a player for £80+ million just to sign players of the same value? Keeping in mind that Villa are signing players without any major sales.

This week will be interesting, I’m sure we will have more clarity by the end of it.

 

[stormfly]

It will cost about £20 mill to keep him for the season.

£20 mill for around 30 league goals isn’t bad business in today’s market.

 

[Cornpattbuck]

Only thing that concerns me is that we seem to be in a position where we HAVE to sell Kane to sign 2 CB’s that we should’ve been signing regardless of whether he leaves or not.

How can a club of our size and stature still be in a financial state where we need to sell a player for £80+ million just to sign players of the same value? Keeping in mind that Villa are signing players without any major sales.

This week will be interesting, I’m sure we will have more clarity by the end of it.

I think we're all pretty much here at the moment. We also desperately need someone who has any sort of ability to sell players that we don't want anymore.

 

[nicdic]

Reports all along have said two centre backs.

 

[G Ron]

The levy apologists are out in force. Utd dropping 70plus mill on a striker and 60 on an am in the same window without blinking whilst wanting the ownership out. Us selling a generational talent and filling a position we should have signed 3 years ago.

They got Onana too. That’s what I was getting at in the Tapsoba thread. Stadium game changer my arse!

 

[TheChosenOne]

£20 mill for around 30 league goals isn’t bad business in today’s market.

Who am I to argue with logic ?

 

[KingNick]

It will cost about £20 mill to keep him for the season.

Do you mean his wages? If so, that’s not right. He’s not on 385k per week at the moment.

 

[Gilzeanking]

Cowlin is reporting from Daily Mail so pinch of... Levy wants 90 mill quid Bayern so far offering 75. We'll find out whats what tomorrow I suppose..

 

[TheChosenOne]

Do you mean his wages? If so, that’s not right. He’s not on 385k per week at the moment.

+£50K goal bonus allegedly.

 

[yido_number1]

They got Onana too. That’s what I was getting at in the Tapsoba thread. Stadium game changer my arse!

Game changer for Levy and Lewis when they sell. Debt secured against the club and maximum return for them. Same with the hotel, go kart track etc.