Back June at the very earliest imo
More likely July for preseason
Based on ? It’s a grade 2 tear exactly like last time. He will be fit for final and England.
Back June at the very earliest imo
More likely July for preseason
Based on ? It’s a grade 2 tear exactly like last time. He will be fit for final and England.
So if he's fit, and yet not playing, so dropped.Are you reading what we've said/are saying?
Not a single person has suggested dropping Kane. How can we drop what isn't/won't be playing?
What we're discussing is the conundrum about throwing him straight back into the starting line-up, if his return happens to coincide with either the semi or the final, should we get there.
Glad I'm not the only one who thought that lol.This is all very well, but can we talk about how cringe his twitter "let's go" video was.
This is all very well, but can we talk about how cringe his twitter "let's go" video was.
Glad I'm not the only one who thought that lol.
Im prepared to let it slide as he was clearly just caught up in moment.
So if he's fit, and yet not playing, so dropped.
Unless you're suggesting he's not fit, in that sense, in which case he's not returned from injury.
Yes, I've understood all the above. My question, in light of all that, is whether you're suggesting dropping Harry.Dimi, buddy, you've totally lost me.
We were simply discussing whether (the currently injured) Kane should be instantly put into the starting line-up of he's declared match fit in the days leading up to the semi, or the final should we get there.
And much of the discussion was based upon previous results achieved while he wasn't playing, and then the downturn in results (and performances) when he was immediately reintroduced to the team when he regained fitness.
Yes, I've understood all the above. My question, in light of all that, is whether you're suggesting dropping Harry.
No one is ever dropped for no reason at all, the above seem to me, to be reasons why you'd drop Harry should he regain fitness.
I don't understand what's confused you.
That's not the issue here, this whole argument began because you stated what you did, and I asked "so you mean dropping Kane?" and you got all confused.What's confused me, is the fact that nobody has suggested (or talked about) 'dropping' Kane.
The boys won without him on Wednesday. If we win games in the next few weeks, they'll have been won without him. Should he not be fit for the semi, and we're lucky enough to progress, it'll be done without him.
Just like all the wins we achieved without him during his last spell out of the team.
When he was instantly brought straight back into the starting line-up, the results disappeared, along with our safe league position.
Our discussion has been about whether he should just be put straight back into the team if he happens to regain fitness just before the semi, or the final should we get there.
Do you think he should be?
Once again you're saying I've suggested dropping Kane when I've done nothing of the sort.
There's a narrative that Spurs play better without Kane that's been going around since last season when he got injured at Bournemouth. I actually think it's half true, I think we look better more aesthetically pleasing on the eye and less predictable but I think we are overall stronger with Kane.
If Kane is fit, he plays. If we seem to play better without him at times (which we do), that's for Pochettino and his coaching team to analyse and address.
Kane is one of the best players on the planet, so any questions about how we play should begin with a fully fit Kane being in the team.
Once again you're saying I've suggested dropping Kane when I've done nothing of the sort.