Definitely no way that Levy will get his pants pulled down on this one. Kane is 28 and has 3 years left on his contract. If City want him then pay the money that he warrants. If Grealish is going for 100m, then they need to consider the number that a proven goal scorer is going to generate especially from a businessman like Levy.The reason Kane got a £250,000 a week 6 year contract with no release clause is to make sure that we get a big lump of money in case he leaves early. Talk of letting him go cheap is nonsense. Maybe not to some of you, but definitely to Levy.
And also getting Kane massively improves their chances of dominating and not letting Pool back in.
No way would that make any sense to me. Who in the squad would be able to guarantee us the 20+ goals per season Harry does year in year out? I hate to say it, but Kane is irreplaceable.
So we sell Kane the goal-scorer, but keep Kane the goal-assister.
except where he liked every bday post except the spurs one, why show so much contempt for the club who made you? his really showing little class, his useless brother is ampfying this
I fucking hate City with a passion in the way they do business. Is almost they need not negotiate - the media will do that for them, assuming a price and they will be happy to go from there just at the final stage of splashing those filthy cash. Success or not is another matter, they can enjoy turning players' heads and destabilise the clubs.I just hate how this narrative becomes about us and Kane.
The narrative across all media should be: filthy oil slave clubs need to pay the filthy oil club premium. That goes for Grealish just as much as Kane.
Son has scored 40 goals in the last 3 seasons in the league, which is decent for a winger, but by no means the goal machine we desparately need if Kane leaves.
Was he definitely meant to be there today?
One can hopeKnowing Kane’s luck he’ll sign for City, they’ll be investigated and banned from CL for 4 years and relegated to the Championship.
It’s exactly what the media used to do for Man U in Fergies daysI fucking hate City with a passion in the way they do business. Is almost they need not negotiate - the media will do that for them, assuming a price and they will be happy to go from there just at the final stage of splashing those filthy cash. Success or not is another matter, they can enjoy turning players' heads and destabilise the clubs.
He has his legendary agent to thank for that.This is it for me. When Kane was negotiating the contract he was in a position of power.
He could have signed a shorter contract or got a release clause put in.
I certainly haven't missed it.2013 with Bale was the last time we had this summer circus with “star“ player. Forgotten how tiresome this shit is.
Was saying to someone that would be the best scenario for me. How wonderful would it be if they got a massive points reduction and a CL ban. Seems there’s ample evidence to do it, just no will from the league to really hit themKnowing Kane’s luck he’ll sign for City, they’ll be investigated and banned from CL for 4 years and relegated to the Championship.
We don’t necessarily need a goal machine, although that would be nice, we need more players to contribute with goals, Man City’s top scorer last season was Gundogan and they won the league. We need more players scoring 14/15 goals a seasonsSon has scored 40 goals in the last 3 seasons in the league, which is decent for a winger, but by no means the goal machine we desparately need if Kane leaves.
So we sell Kane the goal-scorer, but keep Kane the goal-assister.
Son has scored 40 goals in the last 3 seasons in the league, which is decent for a winger, but by no means the goal machine we desparately need if Kane leaves.
Probably be an unpopular view of mine but i admire Son and respect him far more than Kane, he is more proffesional and doesn't have as big an ego as Kane.