- Mar 21, 2005
- 7,833
- 418
- Staff
- #1
yeah i reckon i'm going to get shot down over this but hear me out...
Now i know he's a good keeper but does some of the blame for our poor form lie at his feet(or gloves)? looking at our recent goals scored to shots on target shows that our strikers are pretty wasteful or is it showing we are easy to score against?
I saw the stats for the stoke game and remembered seeing something similar against man united so i thought i'd check our recent few fixtures.
stoke 2 shots on target- 1 goal
us 6 on target- 1 goal
everton 5 on target- 1 goal
us 5 on 0 goals(this game shows both sides to be wasteful)
united 5 on target-3 goals
us 6 on target -1 goal
scum 8 on target 5 goals
us 5 on target goals 2
even stevenage scored with only 3 shots on target
stevo 3 shots on target -goals 1
us 5 on target goals 3( more like it)
wigan 3 on target goals 1
us 10 on, 3 goals.
city 4 on target-goals 3
us 3 on, goals 2
looking down the list it seems like a few things stand out,
one is that if you hit the target two to four times against us you'll be two goals for the better,
we score roughly 1 in every four times we hit the target at the moment(41 shots on target 12 goals) but 30 shots against us has seen us let in 15 goals.
that's a goal every other shot on target.
jeez, i didn't actually think it'd be as bad as that when i started looking into it :-|
I'm not even sure what the answer is, that's the problem.
does the problem lie with Brad? or is it down to the back four?
Now i know he's a good keeper but does some of the blame for our poor form lie at his feet(or gloves)? looking at our recent goals scored to shots on target shows that our strikers are pretty wasteful or is it showing we are easy to score against?
I saw the stats for the stoke game and remembered seeing something similar against man united so i thought i'd check our recent few fixtures.
stoke 2 shots on target- 1 goal
us 6 on target- 1 goal
everton 5 on target- 1 goal
us 5 on 0 goals(this game shows both sides to be wasteful)
united 5 on target-3 goals
us 6 on target -1 goal
scum 8 on target 5 goals
us 5 on target goals 2
even stevenage scored with only 3 shots on target
stevo 3 shots on target -goals 1
us 5 on target goals 3( more like it)
wigan 3 on target goals 1
us 10 on, 3 goals.
city 4 on target-goals 3
us 3 on, goals 2
looking down the list it seems like a few things stand out,
one is that if you hit the target two to four times against us you'll be two goals for the better,
we score roughly 1 in every four times we hit the target at the moment(41 shots on target 12 goals) but 30 shots against us has seen us let in 15 goals.
that's a goal every other shot on target.
jeez, i didn't actually think it'd be as bad as that when i started looking into it :-|
I'm not even sure what the answer is, that's the problem.
does the problem lie with Brad? or is it down to the back four?