What's new

Complete waste of everybodies time

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hoops

Well-Known Member
Mar 15, 2015
3,650
6,363
Why bother playing Jansen, Wimmer, Davies, Dier, Trippier and put Wanyama and Lamela on the bench When you have Carroll and Onomah in midfield. Waste of everyones time.

Its like conceding the game before a ball is kicked. Pointless.
 

eddiev14

SC Supporter
Jan 18, 2005
7,174
19,688
We rested the majority of our key players, and gave others crucial experience.

They can't keep playing two games a week with just the full backs rotating, we have to rest them at some point.

Right decision IMO.
 

werty

Well-Known Member
Aug 8, 2005
25,102
26,363
2lw3vyf.gif
 

Adam456

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2005
4,458
3,124
Why bother playing Jansen, Wimmer, Davies, Dier, Trippier and put Wanyama and Lamela on the bench When you have Carroll and Onomah in midfield. Waste of everyones time.

Its like conceding the game before a ball is kicked. Pointless.
MELTDOWN !
 

Metalhead

But that's a debate for another thread.....
Nov 24, 2013
25,413
38,427
Why bother playing Jansen, Wimmer, Davies, Dier, Trippier and put Wanyama and Lamela on the bench When you have Carroll and Onomah in midfield. Waste of everyones time.

Its like conceding the game before a ball is kicked. Pointless.
Couldn't you have chucked this in the match thread?
 

double0

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2006
14,423
12,258
Why bother playing Jansen, Wimmer, Davies, Dier, Trippier and put Wanyama and Lamela on the bench When you have Carroll and Onomah in midfield. Waste of everyones time.

Its like conceding the game before a ball is kicked. Pointless.

Pointless is a bit strong. Onomah Winks etc need games.

Just a crying shame we've lost again at Anfield when is this nightmare going to end. Whatever team we put out Anfield Stamford Bridge Emirates we have an appalling record.
 

Hoops

Well-Known Member
Mar 15, 2015
3,650
6,363
Pointless is a bit strong. Onomah Winks etc need games.

Just a crying shame we've lost again at Anfield when is this nightmare going to end. Whatever team we put out Anfield Stamford Bridge Emirates we have an appalling record.

Absolute tosh mate. We could easily have won tonight, we just didnt take it seriously.
 

Hazardousman

Audere est Facere
Jul 24, 2013
4,619
8,944
I don't think Spurs are the team for you matey

I was going to say, hoops will be waiting a while if he wants a trophy, more chance of me awarding sky a medal for fair and unbiased punditry.

Our goal is clearly stay in the champions league at keep qualifying at any cost, even trophies, we seem allergic to winning them.
 

TheHood

.................................
Jan 17, 2006
1,671
2,104
We rested the majority of our key players, and gave others crucial experience.

They can't keep playing two games a week with just the full backs rotating, we have to rest them at some point.

Right decision IMO.

How is it the right decision if we lost the game?

The club's approach to squad management is absolutely appalling and it's been this way for most of the decade.

This whole approach had been an abject failure, playing weakend tournaments in the cup tournaments hasn't yielded any of the supposed benefits.

We have consistently collapsed in the latter stages of the league campaign, it happend during the Redknapp years and it happened last year.

And yet so many still want this approach, still think that it's a necessity, it is utterly bizarre.
 

kaz Hirai

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2008
17,692
25,340
Maybe if our 30 million pound backup man was available we might have done better.

Actually not sarcasm, his pace might have helped stretch things

Right choice to rest the main guys though, bigger fish, we gotta believe we can go for the title and secure our place in the CL knockout
 

glacierSpurs

Well-Known Member
Sep 28, 2013
16,163
25,473
Nah... We could even afford to play 2nd stringers in Europa Cup, what's the big deal of EFL Cup?

But I really wish the team to wanna win every game... And I hope the gaffer thinks that too..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top