- Oct 19, 2004
- 39,837
- 50,713
Yeah, but BC often simplifies in this way.
Dropping back, losing the initiative, or even just taking our foot of the gas, after playing fantastically well to more-or-less win the match (which we then do under pressure), and he will categorise the whole performance, rather than a part of it as shit.
No offence, BC, and not wanting to initiate one of our infamous and interminable 500 page arguments, but you do do this. The second half performance against Wigan was disappointing, because we could have really biatch slapped them - but they had a part in it by upping their game. But that doesn't mean we played shit against Wigan.
The point was, which you seemed to miss, that Redknapp being present didn't mean we played any better against Watford - for 90 minutes - or Wigan for 45. It was a poor excuse for a performance that lacked ambition.