- Jul 7, 2016
- 1,918
- 5,047
I thought United were quite close to FFP until the summerNot many options for Gallagher. I could see united throwing £40m at Chelsea on deadline day though
I thought United were quite close to FFP until the summerNot many options for Gallagher. I could see united throwing £40m at Chelsea on deadline day though
Conor’s made it pretty clear he’s not pushing for a move and would like to stay at Chelsea.My only hesitation with Gallagher - does he really want to come to Spurs?
That is a big deal to Ange - even more so than talent and tactical fit.
My only hesitation with Gallagher - does he really want to come to Spurs?
That is a big deal to Ange - even more so than talent and tactical fit.
I’ve heard this 30th June FFP deadline being bandied about.
If that’s the case, surely clubs have to make money this window, seeing as the summer window doesn’t open until 1st July?
Yeah definitely will be which means it's likely to be a last day deal if anything.Is this not dependent on Pierre going? No saley no buyey
I don't see it happening, Just don't think anyone is going to offer what we want for Pierre, and I just don't think once players are back from Int' duty and injury we need another CM. And I'm not a massive fan of... 'just back the manager'Yeah definitely will be which means it's likely to be a last day deal if anything.
Probably why there aren't many alternative names for midfield floating around either.
I think that only happens if a deal can be brokered where the loan fee is quite substantial and a solid obligation to make the deal permanent is also agreed.You have loan Hojbjerg out if it allows to bring in Gallagher as long as it's who Ange wants
I think a dry loan would be absolutely fine because we can sell him with more time in the summer. I just think if he's not in our long term plans we should just loan him if we have an incoming who is part of those plans.I think that only happens if a deal can be brokered where the loan fee is quite substantial and a solid obligation to make the deal permanent is also agreed.
Even that’s not ideal for the bottom line, but if any club has some wiggle room where it comes to FFP/PSR I imagine it is us.
I've said this elsewhere but I think we have 3 midfield positions and currently 4 players who can cover them sufficiently. Maybe 5 if you have Deki as the Madders alternative but I think he's at his best further forwards.I don't see it happening, Just don't think anyone is going to offer what we want for Pierre, and I just don't think once players are back from Int' duty and injury we need another CM. And I'm not a massive fan of... 'just back the manager'
£80m and you could be right.Not many options for Gallagher. I could see united throwing £40m at Chelsea on deadline day though
You have loan Hojbjerg out if it allows to bring in Gallagher as long as it's who Ange wants
Yeah it’s absolutely pointless to replace Skipp with this lad. Both do similar things. Its the case of wanting a new shiny thing for the sake of it.To throw a cat amongst the pigeons...
If I were to choose from the admittedly tiny sample of this weekends games, between him and Skipp, I'd probably say that Skipp offered more to the team and looked the more dynamic player.
I personally think Skipp had a great game and Gallagher was pretty anonymous.