Levy still has to sign off, he’s part owner of the club. He'll be involved either ahead of time with a budget and let the team go to work. Or over and above that to evaluate if more spend is needed.
Yes because they won’t have to do as much defending. We basically defended for 75 out of 90 minutes every game against the better sides. that’s a lot more chances for a fuck up to occur than if your defending for between 40 and 55 minutes say in a possesion based attacking system.
£30m transactions and you don’t think the chairman/ceos signature is needed? it’s not a couple of grand for a laptop
Yeah if he's the player we want and it really is down to us trying to save a few quid then I don't get it and we're being idiots.
To be fair to the club, there were likely very similar comments in the Kulu and Maddison thread. It's business.
Again where are you getting it from we are trying to reduce the fee we verbally agreed? Yesterday you said it was from what I had posted, and I told you that it was about the structure of the deal.
That's not how I've heard it tbh.
The same Liverpool that going by reports have pulled out of the race for him?
Me too. I also think it's slightly telling that no one else seems to be in for him.
And that is still possible. From my pov it very much looks like history repeating itself, because I've seen how this scenario we are currently in has played out before.
Literally just above my post. Sorry but not everything is about what you say.
Well that’s pissed on my cornflakes
I know that. That's why I asked where you'd heard or seen it because initially you had used my name as your source of information and you had got that wrong.
Not directly asking you for the answer to this query, but why would our negotiation team/Levy believe that such a strategy with such an (apparent) low success rate is worth repeating or continuing for such a key player/position??
