What's new

Next Manager Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.

chas vs dave

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2008
5,459
22,156
He really doesnt though. The level of experience Jol, Redknapp & Poch all had quite easily surpass that of Ange. They were adept at punching above their weight as well, which in the admittedly very few opportunities to do similar at Celtic, he has failed.

Tactically, yeah, the approach seems to be very entertaining & attacking & fits what we want. But it is also unflinching & he doesnt exactly seem to either have or even want a plan b to take into games that require something a bit more grounded. Everything people praise about his approach & also the whole passing backwards thing makes me laugh knowing they will all be ripping it apart in a few months calling it tactically naïve.
Martin Jol didn't have anywhere near the level of experience as AP.

Unless you've now decided that RKC Waalwijk, and Roda are on a similar level to celtic.
 

robotsonic

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
2,442
11,353
He really doesnt though. The level of experience Jol, Redknapp & Poch all had quite easily surpass that of Ange. They were adept at punching above their weight as well, which in the admittedly very few opportunities to do similar at Celtic, he has failed.
You can have Redknapp and Poch, but with the best will in the world, managing your country to an international trophy, then winning the J1 title, and then multiple titles with Celtic, is a tiny bit more experience than managing RKC Waalwijk :cautious:
 

danielneeds

Kick-Ass
May 5, 2004
24,183
48,814

Guntz

Loves a good meme/gif
Aug 15, 2011
7,417
55,360
He really doesnt though. The level of experience Jol, Redknapp & Poch all had quite easily surpass that of Ange. They were adept at punching above their weight as well, which in the admittedly very few opportunities to do similar at Celtic, he has failed.

Tactically, yeah, the approach seems to be very entertaining & attacking & fits what we want. But it is also unflinching & he doesnt exactly seem to either have or even want a plan b to take into games that require something a bit more grounded. Everything people praise about his approach & also the whole passing backwards thing makes me laugh knowing they will all be ripping it apart in a few months calling it tactically naïve.

Redknapp, yeah I'll give you that one.

However, Jol's experience consisted of managing two Dutch amateur teams and two lower Eredivisie sides, and an assistant job before he managed us.

Poch only had 5 years of top-flight management experience before he joined Spurs.

Ange has been in management for over 20 years, just not in Europe. He's hardly devoid of it.
 

brasil_spur

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2006
12,752
16,897
Cause we're the 9th wealthiest club in the world and shouldn't be evaluating managers based off their success in fucking Japan & Australia.
You need to really quickly get yourself to the point where you realise that this means nothing. 9th richest but we'll never (under Levy) be spending in that bracket.

Also 9th highest footballing income / wealth, not richest. Newcastle are far richer than us. There's a handful of middle east teams that dwarf us too.

Given the lack of mega richer owners who are willing to spend money outside of the club's ability to generate revenue to achieve success and then the overly cautious approach of Levy, think of us at somewhere in the 15-20 category and base your expectations off of that.
 

Wearegoingtowintheleague

Well-Known Member
Nov 10, 2018
850
4,405
Imagine we hadn’t wasted the previous four of his peak years playing bullshit, cowardly counter-attacking football?
I agree, which to me when we are on our last chance to hang on to Kane,we need to show some ambition.

Kane has always said he will stay if we continue to progress.

Ange may turn out well, but on the face on it when the likes of JN are available signing him is not showing that ambition.

As fans we can talk ourselves around, big him up, love his videos and convince ourselves he is the next best thing, but players are different. Their careers are limited and whether we like it or not signing Ange is not a statement signing.

If people are fine to lose our one world class player and position ourselves alongside the likes of Brighton as they nearly signed him them great. But let's be honest as nice as Brightons football is as well run as they are they arent going to be challenging for the title and that's what World class players want to be doing.
 

quackers

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
447
1,750
Redknapp, yeah I'll give you that one.

However, Jol's experience consisted of managing two Dutch amateur teams and two lower Eredivisie sides, and an assistant job before he managed us.

Poch only had 5 years of top-flight management experience before he joined Spurs.

Ange has been in management for over 20 years, just not in Europe. He's hardly devoid of it.
does my 7 years of coaching boys youth team football count?
 

snakehipsspurs

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2017
2,225
15,688
He really doesnt though. The level of experience Jol, Redknapp & Poch all had quite easily surpass that of Ange. They were adept at punching above their weight as well, which in the admittedly very few opportunities to do similar at Celtic, he has failed.

Tactically, yeah, the approach seems to be very entertaining & attacking & fits what we want. But it is also unflinching & he doesnt exactly seem to either have or even want a plan b to take into games that require something a bit more grounded. Everything people praise about his approach & also the whole passing backwards thing makes me laugh knowing they will all be ripping it apart in a few months calling it tactically naïve.
Every single thing you’ve said about Ange in this post is wrong.
  • he massively overachieved with the resources available to him at both teams he managed in Australia, in Japan and with the oz national team. Taking teams who either never won, or hadn’t in a long time, to trophies/titles within 2 years. Celtic is the outlier in his career.
  • He sticks to attacking principles, but is very open to switching formations and tactics to achieve that with the players at his disposal.
  • Celtic and a national team alone is much more experience than Jol had pre-Spurs
I don’t understand why people are just making up things to bash the guy. If you don’t know who he is, that’s fine. You don’t need to bullshit (not just aimed at you btw, lots of people at fault)
 

fishhhandaricecake

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
19,539
48,795
Every single thing you’ve said about Ange in this post is wrong.
  • he massively overachieved with the resources available to him at both teams he managed in Australia, in Japan and with the oz national team. Taking teams who either never won, or hadn’t in a long time, to trophies/titles within 2 years. Celtic is the outlier in his career.
  • He sticks to attacking principles, but is very open to switching formations and tactics to achieve that with the players at his disposal.
  • Celtic and a national team alone is much more experience than Jol had pre-Spurs
I don’t understand why people are just making up things to bash the guy. If you don’t know who he is, that’s fine. You don’t need to bullshit (not just aimed at you btw, lots of people at fault)
Spot on! 👏
 

mil1lion

This is the place to be
May 7, 2004
42,670
78,517
Tottenham (permanent) managers of the last 20 years reads like this:

2004-2004 - Santini - failure.
2004-2007 - Jol - success.
2007-2008 - Ramos - failure.
2008-2012 - Redknapp - success.
2012-2013 - AVB - failure.
2014-2019 - Poch - success.
2019-2021 - Mourinho - failure.
2021-2021 - Nuno - failure.
2021-2023 - Conte - failure.

So in the last 20 years I would class 3 of our managers as a success. All 3 of them has similarities in that they:

- larger than life characters.
- had that ability to be friends aswell as the boss.
- progressed the club forwards.

Also, none of those 3 came with a big pedigree or history of winning multiple trophies. We are a funny club here at Spurs and what we need more than anything right now, is a manager who can come in, bridge the gap between the pitch and the fans and help us all enjoy our football and ultimately fall back in love with the club.

Is Ange the man to do that, only one way to know, but does he have similarities to our past 3 successes, absolutely he does.
It depends what is considered failure at Spurs. I wouldn't say Conte was a failure, got us 4th and was challenging 4th again this season. He just made it clear that top 4 isn't enough for him and tapped out. Jose got us into Europe ahead of Arsenal and got to a cup final. I don't think it's as black and white as success or failure. Success for Levy is regular Europe qualification and the odd CL run. Success for the fans has altered due to our runs in the CL and wanting more than that. Given what we do in the transfer window I think there's more success than given credit for to be honest. It's more a matter of who can get the most out of a limited budget and not demand the resources of the top clubs. We are where we belong under Levy but the fans want us to level up now so expectation is at another level.
 

danielneeds

Kick-Ass
May 5, 2004
24,183
48,814
I agree, which to me when we are on our last chance to hang on to Kane,we need to show some ambition.

Kane has always said he will stay if we continue to progress.

Ange may turn out well, but on the face on it when the likes of JN are available signing him is not showing that ambition.

As fans we can talk ourselves around, big him up, love his videos and convince ourselves he is the next best thing, but players are different. Their careers are limited and whether we like it or not signing Ange is not a statement signing.

If people are fine to lose our one world class player and position ourselves alongside the likes of Brighton as they nearly signed him them great. But let's be honest as nice as Brightons football is as well run as they are they arent going to be challenging for the title and that's what World class players want to be doing.
Making a load of tenuous promises to a coach like Nagelsmann who is only luke-warm in wanting the job in order to try and keep Kane is not ambition, it’s delusion and foolhardiness.
 

-Afri-Coy-

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2012
5,866
18,663
Every single thing you’ve said about Ange in this post is wrong.
  • he massively overachieved with the resources available to him at both teams he managed in Australia, in Japan and with the oz national team. Taking teams who either never won, or hadn’t in a long time, to trophies/titles within 2 years. Celtic is the outlier in his career.
  • He sticks to attacking principles, but is very open to switching formations and tactics to achieve that with the players at his disposal.
  • Celtic and a national team alone is much more experience than Jol had pre-Spurs
I don’t understand why people are just making up things to bash the guy. If you don’t know who he is, that’s fine. You don’t need to bullshit (not just aimed at you btw, lots of people at fault)

Its also completely unnecessary to think that what he achieved in Japan and Australia has any relevance on the best league in the world. It is literally world’s apart, in every sense of the saying.

What he achieved at Celtic is on par with what most managers who go there achieve. They spent more in the summer than the rest of the league combined, so not exactly punching above his weight there either.

I get it, you and a few others are excited by the football and tactics he employs. But that’s not the only thing that’s going to stop our ship from sinking.

There’s no need to exaggerate his achievements anymore than there is a need to do it for other managers. We can assess his achievements for what they are but we need to keep our expectations within the realms of the reality of the EPL.

It would be a huge step up for Ange, and I can completely understand why some fans are apprehensive.
 

muppetman

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2011
9,155
25,593
To expand on/simplify this:

2004-2004 - Santini - boring personality, boring football = failure
2004-2007 - Jol - warm and likeable personality, attacking free flowing football = success
2007-2008 - Ramos - boring personality (albeit partly due to language barrier), boring football, bad results = cup win but failure in the league and overall given the length of tenure
2008-2012 - Redknapp - likeable personality, attacking free flowing football = success
2012-2013 - AVB - okish personality but hardly hugely galvanising, boring football = did okish
2014-2019 - Poch - warm and likeable personality, attacking free flowing football = success
2019-2021 - Mourinho - not likeable personality, boring football = failure
2021-2021 - Nuno - not likeable personality, boring football = failure
2021-2023 - Conte - not likeable personality, boring football = failure

The correlation and conditions for a Manager to be 'success' at Tottenham is pretty clear.

This is why I thought Slot would be perfect and its why I think Big Ange could be a very good option.
Alternatively:
Santini - won very few games
Jol - won quite a few (considering where we were)
Ramos - won a cup but not a lot else
Redknapp - got us up the table and competing - ie won a lot (considering . . .)


I think you can see where I'm going with this.

Yes, I think a unifying personality is important but the overwhelmingly top thing needed is to have success, which is of course relative. I loved Poch and the sense of belonging that he brought, but would it have been enough by itself if we weren't competing at the top and indeed getting to a CL final - probably not.

Cynical but true.
 

rossdapep

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2011
22,359
80,551
Saints 2 -4 Newcastle
Saints 1-2 QPR
Saints 0-3 West Brom
Saints 0-1 Norwich
Saints 1-3 Chelsea
Saints 0-1 Tottenham (AVB tottenham)
Saints 2-3 Tottenham x 2 (sherwood tottenham)
Saints 2-3 Villa
Saints 1-2 Everton
Saints 0- 3 Chelsea
Saints 1-3 West Ham
Saints 0-3 Liverpool
Saints 1-4 City
Saints 0-1 Cardiff

That is a selection of what I would say are either bad results or bee. comfortably beaten by the bigger boys from Poch's reign of just 18 months at Southampton.

He did beat Chelsea, City, Liverpool and United in that period but they did have some poor results.

Another stat was that they never recovered a deficit at HT and also blew a few leads in his time there.

Yet under Poch, Tottenham rarely surrendered leads, they would not face as many shock or poor results.

Why am I bringing this up?

Well, sometimes it's easy to get caught up in facts like "Ange was abysmal in Europe", that can be a concern.

But sometimes it really is simply down to the quality you have on the field.

Poch didn't have Vertonghen, Walker and Toby at Southampton.

Nor did he have a Harry Kane.

Is it possible that with Kane, Bissouma, Romero a new GK and CB, Ange's teams are much more prepared to overcome strong opposition? Like Poch was?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top