What's new

Qatar 2022

spursfan1991

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2008
1,747
4,058
The hypocrites will continue to cry on a football show though.
Screenshot_20221122-075521_Gallery.jpg
 

Trix

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2004
19,775
332,594
Everyone who had a choice to stand up for something they have been virtue signalling about for the last few months/years who dropped nuts at the threat of a yellow card.
Yeah but they haven't dropped their stance, have they. They've just decided the course of action they were going to take is now not the correct one, and they are still talking about it to the press and via social media. People going on like they've u turned on their beliefs and they haven't. They are not politicians or activists they are footballers, and they are still pushing a positive line regarding inclusivity, just not in the way they had planned.
 

fishhhandaricecake

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
19,584
48,890
Yeah but they haven't dropped their stance, have they. They've just decided the course of action they were going to take is now not the correct one, and they are still talking about it to the press and via social media. People going on like they've u turned on their beliefs and they haven't. They are not politicians or activists they are footballers, and they are still pushing a positive line regarding inclusivity, just not in the way they had planned.
Exactly how I feel bang on mate! ?
 

dudu

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2011
5,314
11,048
Yeah but they haven't dropped their stance, have they. They've just decided the course of action they were going to take is now not the correct one, and they are still talking about it to the press and via social media. People going on like they've u turned on their beliefs and they haven't. They are not politicians or activists they are footballers, and they are still pushing a positive line regarding inclusivity, just not in the way they had planned.

And they can do that, which is completely their choice. But after all the talk and press they got about doing it, only to not because they are worried about what might happen, kind of makes the talk mean less to me. Like you say, they are not politicians or activists, but many kinda choose to be when it suits them and their brand to be. They made me think, with their chat about wearing the armband, that they were going to stand up and actually be counted over something more important than football but in the end, they decided not to and I think it is fair to criticize as no one forced them to say anything in the first place.
 

Trix

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2004
19,775
332,594
And they can do that, which is completely their choice. But after all the talk and press they got about doing it, only to not because they are worried about what might happen, kind of makes the talk mean less to me. Like you say, they are not politicians or activists, but many kinda choose to be when it suits them and their brand to be. They made me think, with their chat about wearing the armband, that they were going to stand up and actually be counted over something more important than football but in the end, they decided not to and I think it is fair to criticize as no one forced them to say anything in the first place.
And they clearly did that to try and put pressure on Fifa to allow it. There is a reason Fifa have waited until the morning of the game to say they won't, because they'd have spent the last few months taking flak for it.

I've seen numerous posts online of fans saying they turned up in rainbow t-shirts, hats etc, and they were all made to take them off before they could go in. I haven't seen one saying they refused to take them off and instead missed the games.
 

Tucker

Shitehawk
Jul 15, 2013
31,583
147,758
And they clearly did that to try and put pressure on Fifa to allow it. There is a reason Fifa have waited until the morning of the game to say they won't, because they'd have spent the last few months taking flak for it.

I've seen numerous posts online of fans saying they turned up in rainbow t-shirts, hats etc, and they were all made to take them off before they could go in. I haven't seen one saying they refused to take them off and instead missed the games.
I have, was posted a couple of pages back. He refused to take his rainbow t-shirt off, and eventually after being held in custody for like an hour they just let him in.
 

Tucker

Shitehawk
Jul 15, 2013
31,583
147,758
And they can do that, which is completely their choice. But after all the talk and press they got about doing it, only to not because they are worried about what might happen, kind of makes the talk mean less to me. Like you say, they are not politicians or activists, but many kinda choose to be when it suits them and their brand to be. They made me think, with their chat about wearing the armband, that they were going to stand up and actually be counted over something more important than football but in the end, they decided not to and I think it is fair to criticize as no one forced them to say anything in the first place.
This is the crux of it for me. Southgate and Kane have used the one love armband as a shield to deflect from the bad press surrounding the world cup, and to deselect from legitimate questions about whether England should be attending the tournament at all. The Welsh manager Robert Page has been doing the same.

Southgate in particular likes to go on about how the players are principled etc etc. Making a statement or a protest means nothing if you aren’t willing to accept a little push back from those you are making the statement against. If they really cared about the message they wouldn’t let something as paltry as a booking get in their way, would they?

They‘re all cowards. And they’ve bottled this massively.
 

dudu

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2011
5,314
11,048
And they clearly did that to try and put pressure on Fifa to allow it. There is a reason Fifa have waited until the morning of the game to say they won't, because they'd have spent the last few months taking flak for it.

I've seen numerous posts online of fans saying they turned up in rainbow t-shirts, hats etc, and they were all made to take them off before they could go in. I haven't seen one saying they refused to take them off and instead missed the games.

They are quite different and I'm sure you understand the nuance between the two, but in either situation people can't be surprised if they are seen to be virtue signalling if they don't follow through with things they say they are going to do because of some personal inconvenience to them.

You know what really have put pressure on FIFA.... Following through and making an actual statement.

I do get your point, but it doesn't change how I feel about the situation. It is easy to say the right things but when it comes to crunch time, I don't trust these people to follow through.
 

EastUpperDK82

Well-Known Member
Jan 16, 2022
3,151
6,858
Former Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt did it !! ... Rainbow at the stadium in Qatar ? ... how did she do it ?

More at stake than a yellow card
The former Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt has chosen to defy FIFA's ban on wearing rainbow armbands.

Helle Thorning-Schmidt who is chair of DBU's Governance and Development Committee, is in Qatar to represent DBU (Danish FA) in connection with the World Cup .

She herself has not commented on whether her outfit is a signal to FIFA and, not least, Qatar, who have been strongly criticized for their views on human rights up to the World Cup.

Link in Danish... But the picture says it all.

 
Last edited:

brasil_spur

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2006
12,762
16,942
At least one of the England footballers in Qatar had the balls to wear the One Love armband, shame it was one that actually doesn't have any balls though....

1669136713490.png
 

Yid-ol

Just-outside Edinburgh
Jan 16, 2006
31,237
19,523
At least one of the England footballers in Qatar had the balls to wear the One Love armband, shame it was one that actually doesn't have any balls though....

View attachment 119311
Also she doesn't have the threat of any action taken against her! So easier for her to do it.

And that's not a dig at her, I'm glad she wore it, but different circumstances to the men team.
 

nailsy

SC Supporter
Jul 24, 2005
30,536
46,630
And they can do that, which is completely their choice. But after all the talk and press they got about doing it, only to not because they are worried about what might happen, kind of makes the talk mean less to me. Like you say, they are not politicians or activists, but many kinda choose to be when it suits them and their brand to be. They made me think, with their chat about wearing the armband, that they were going to stand up and actually be counted over something more important than football but in the end, they decided not to and I think it is fair to criticize as no one forced them to say anything in the first place.

That's not really true as they've been constantly asked during interviews what action they were planning to take. If they'd said nothing they would have been criticised so they had to say something.
 

BuryMeInEngland

Polish that cock lads
May 24, 2012
11,174
27,984
According to fox right now, there has been 101 minutes of stoppage time in the FIRST 7 MATCHES. At this rate games will be about 2 1/2hours long!
 

brasil_spur

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2006
12,762
16,942
Also she doesn't have the threat of any action taken against her! So easier for her to do it.

And that's not a dig at her, I'm glad she wore it, but different circumstances to the men team.
She's a woman in Qatar openly supporting LGBTQ+, that's pretty risky.
 

brasil_spur

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2006
12,762
16,942
That's not really true as they've been constantly asked during interviews what action they were planning to take. If they'd said nothing they would have been criticised so they had to say something.
Surely then: "we're unsure if we will be able to wear armbands in support of LGBTQ+ due to potential sanctions that may be applied against our players if we do so. Our intention is to wear them, but if the sanctions are seen as unreasonable we will not be asking our players to wear armbands, it will then be their own choosing".

That not only shows the level which in reality they were prepared to go to show support but also shows that the sanctions are unreasonable.

The whole thing was badly handled IMO. As was Dier talking about the banning of alcohol from stadiums. I wouldn't personally be bothered about it, but the point is not that they decided against alcohol it's the timing of it.
 
Top