Harry Kane
- Thread starter RichSpur58
- Start date
I think I would have added some sort of punctuation after the word 'right'. Your post could easily be misconstrued.
Last edited:
Dear Lord no.
he’d take it as an endorsement for the shite appointments, Saha and Nelsen, Mourinho (the whole fucking thing), the first team to not make a purchase in the transfer window, the recent shit show of a manager hunt and the chain of events that lead to Kane wanting to leave.
Sure. Digging his heels and ensuring we get top dollar for Kane is good but it would be worthy of hero worship if he’d embarked on the rebuild when it was called for.
I am sure the neg reps will flow freely ?
- Jun 5, 2004
- 32,221
- 64,290
- Staff
- #43,826
Not now mate. Thanks.
PLTuck
Eternal Optimist
- Aug 22, 2006
- 16,032
- 33,424
Ndombers
Well-Known Member
- Jan 27, 2011
- 918
- 2,369
A&C, ban them. I know they're from a different forum, but still..
sausage
?
- May 17, 2018
- 11,872
- 47,993
In the wrong language ?
If it was said, it was almost definitely said in Spanish or Catalan. Why get protective over something Guardiola said anyway? It's been used enough that someone would have written something about it being fake, and there's nothing out there for that either.
Bluto Blutarsky
Well-Known Member
- Mar 4, 2021
- 15,289
- 71,155
I don’t think Kane cares about being “wanted” he just know he wants out, and obviously blames Levy for standing in his way. I doubt it has occurred to him that he, and his brother, should be deep in conversation with City’s reps about how Kane is worth the money.
That is what professional representation would be doing instead of running to the media.
Scott Spur
SC Supporter
- Aug 9, 2011
- 1,991
- 5,620
Forget setting the pool temperature, if Charlie Kane moves up there he’ll be on call 24/7 turning off light switches….
tommyt
SC Supporter
- Jul 22, 2005
- 6,193
- 11,087
I wonder if this is causing division between Levy, Nuno and Fabio?
I mean, i am sure they understand completely Levy's stance, but at the same time it is clearly disrupting our transfer window and squad development / cohesion / preparation etc.
Does there come a point when Kane is deemed so disruptive ( tin hat time: part of his and City's plan) that for our season to have any chance if success it is better to let him go?
Obviously need to know if the statements being reported in the Mail / Telegraph are factual, but if so he surely can't stay? Full Chernobyl ffs
****
I mean, i am sure they understand completely Levy's stance, but at the same time it is clearly disrupting our transfer window and squad development / cohesion / preparation etc.
Does there come a point when Kane is deemed so disruptive ( tin hat time: part of his and City's plan) that for our season to have any chance if success it is better to let him go?
Obviously need to know if the statements being reported in the Mail / Telegraph are factual, but if so he surely can't stay? Full Chernobyl ffs
****
tiger666
Large Member
- Jan 4, 2005
- 27,978
- 82,216
I'm not protective over anything, I just don't like lies. If you can find the original quote, I'll gladly admit I was wrong.
Tucker
Shitehawk
- Jul 15, 2013
- 31,536
- 147,617
He’s trying to have his cake and eat it. He clearly thought he’d be able to force through a move without alienating the fans. His statement on Twitter the other week showed that, but all it did was dig the hole deeper. If he hadn’t done the Neville interview, and if he’d turned up for training etc the fans likely would have accepted it, been sad to see him go etc.
If he wanted to be open and honest about this, he’d come out publicly and request a transfer, outline his reasons and take the financial hit of losing his loyalty payment. That he’s spent the summer making snide leaks like this to the press, and trying to force the clubs hand by being unprofessional shows his true colours. He might want to win trophies, but the way he’s gone about things this summer demonstrates that money is also playing a massive part in his thinking.
Timberwolf
Well-Known Member
- Jan 17, 2008
- 10,328
- 50,217
Yeah...it's all over the place.
He wants us to feel sorry for him over the gentleman's agreement...despite him having 3 years left on the contract that he signed.
He wants to paint Levy as the bad guy...when City are the ones not offering close to his market value.
He wants to keep the fans onside by expressing how much he genuinely cares about us...while simultaneously lying to us about his holiday and refusing to train.
The whole thing strikes me as extremely naive and lacking in self awareness. He feels he deserves his move but also deserves the respect of the Spurs fan and is almost trying to persuade us none of this is his fault.
Pick a lane Harry. You can't have it all.
