- Jul 12, 2005
- 24,036
- 66,896
I see Nike have got the tracing paper out again.
It's lucky for Spurs when the shield's round the cock
I can't believe people are still giving the most obvious fakes I've seen in years any attention at all...
Quoting for posterity.Can somebody, and by that i mean everyone who thinks these kits are real, just look at the cock shape on the silohuette.Its look like something an 8 year old would come up with when drawing a Spurs badge.If these are real i'll staple my bollocks to my forehead.
Jesus!
Honestly, those designs would make sense, we're going away from home for a year so we have something to match the Wembley year and distinguish it a little bit visually. Then when we come back 'home' we can all fawn over the return to beautiful plain white that will undoubtedly be the most traditional kit we've had in years. It's a story, it marketing driving a narrative. It's not that important.
The AIA logo on the white top has to be red as I suspect that is in their branding guidelines, so for that reason, I am calling fakeI think we can discount those for many reasons, including the fact that it seems pretty clear from the info we've had regarding the shield emblem...
Or I'm just using some dubious info to make me feel better as those kits are grim.
Can't be bothered to check but didn't somebody mention that the large shadowed cockerel violated some rule....
Edit: Found on page 14 maximum emblem 100 cm
http://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/more/kit-advertising