What's new

Thoughts on Yesterday's Game

ItsBoris

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2011
7,970
9,414
Had a bit of time to gather my thoughts on the Wigan game and just wondering if people see it the same way I do.

If that had happened under Harry, myself and many others would have crucified him. So to be fair and consistent, I have to say that I feel like AVB cost us the game yesterday, at least in part. There are a few reasons why but I think the ultimate point that we HAVE to learn as a club - players, coaches, executives, etc, is that the spoils go to those who are bold and brave. People who are cowardly and who play it safe rarely experience glory imo. It's funny that the motto of our club is 'Audere est Facere', while from top to bottom in our club, that saying is the antithesis to how we act.

Just quickly on the team selection yesterday - I thought if we had learned from the Man City game, then neither of Naughton or Parker would have started. Our midfield looked good against City after Parker went off, and BAE played well in the City game. Starting Parker felt like a 'safe' choice from AVB, and what I often see is that 'safe' choices are more risky than the 'risky' choices. Indeed many posters tell me it would be 'too big a risk' not to start Parker, which suggests that he is not starting because he merits it. The selection of Naughton inhibited us later in the game when we needed to bring Dempsey AND Parker off, but since we only had 1 sub left it had to be Parker. Lennon came on to give us another attacking player but we really also needed a third player in midfield to retain control of the game. Carroll or Sigurdsson would have been ideal, but we couldn't do it since we had to bring BAE on for Naughton. So those were AVB's problems yesterday and I think that had we played the right team from the start we could definitely have won.

AVB though I think is a fantastic manager and he isn't the problem with this team and club. The people running the club is the biggest issue imo. We had so many chances to take the bull by the horns and strengthen in the positions we needed to strengthen. Think about it, how many points would a top striker have been worth to us in these last few seasons? Probably at least the number of points we would have needed to make CL last season and this season. We had plenty of chances and never took them. If you want to get top players it always requires financial risk, either on players that are already top class, or younger players who aren't yet proven but who you are willing to take a chance with. Levy thinks he can buy quality players ready to come into the first team on the cheap, and that grenade blew up in his hand with Adebayor.

There's just so many issues that come to mind, I don't want to take a paragraph for each of them. But they bring in a promising young manager and then don't let him determine the transfer targets, they always leave our squad 2 or 3 players short of what it needs, they have weakened the team in successive January transfer windows and brought in stop-gap solutions which never paid off. It's so frustrating, even if say we had bought Moutinho and Leandro last summer, it would have been easily worth it because we definitely would have qualified for the Champions League, while now we look unlikely to do so. It can be seen as a risk, but like I said you only achieve success by taking chances. I think Levy has good intentions, I think he's done a good job in many ways but also a lot of our actions are indicative of great cowardice and excessive frugality, and you can never expect to win anything or succeed if that's how you are going to act.
 

DEFchenkOE

Well-Known Member
Feb 13, 2006
10,527
8,052
Sorry meant to hit agree, I'm still annoyed with what we did in the summer window that we qualified for the CL. We more or less had one opportunity to make a statement, instead we bought VdV in a last minute deal and expected to mount a challenge in the cl and the league with Defoe, Crouch and Pav up front.
 

ItsBoris

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2011
7,970
9,414
Sorry meant to hit agree, I'm still annoyed with what we did in the summer window that we qualified for the CL. We more or less had one opportunity to make a statement, instead we bought VdV in a last minute deal and expected to mount a challenge in the cl and the league with Defoe, Crouch and Pav up front.

Yes that was when it started looking ominous. That season was even worse than this one in terms of strikers, they were absolutely awful. We sold Pav and Crouch for around £10 million each and STILL didn't buy a striker either in winter 2012 or last summer (besides Ade for a minimal fee). Then sold Modric and Van Der Vaart, so I know we had the cash to buy players and Levy still failed to do so.
 

elDiablo

SC Supporter
Feb 2, 2005
4,579
2,950
Hate to trot out the ol' cliche, but we are a work in progress - at least i bloody hope so.

This is AVB's first season with us, and first full season in the prem. You can clearly see the team playing as a unit, particularly on the pressing and defensive front, but this has come at a cost of losing some attacking verve. We saw glimpses throughout the season, but not enough imo.

I may only notice this with our team for obvious reasons, but how many times do you see our defenders with their hands down by their waist, urging someone to come for the ball? I see Walker and Daws do it every game. Im not sure what to read into this, but for me it suggests that the team is not quite on the same wavelength. And why should it after a new midfield, and new tactics. Next season, i expect the flair and fluency to return.

To fulfil this though, AVB will need to be backed, but as every window passes, the realisation that we simply don't have the money we think we have grows stronger. The good thing is that we have some promising youngsters in the squad and on loan, so im hoping this promising bunch will be utilised pre season, and all of our focus can be on some shiny attackers.
 

DEFchenkOE

Well-Known Member
Feb 13, 2006
10,527
8,052
Yes that was when it started looking ominous. That season was even worse than this one in terms of strikers, they were absolutely awful. We sold Pav and Crouch for around £10 million each and STILL didn't buy a striker either in winter 2012 or last summer (besides Ade for a minimal fee). Then sold Modric and Van Der Vaart, so I know we had the cash to buy players and Levy still failed to do so.

The problem is, we don't really know what goes on behind the scenes. Levy is in charge but is he just under orders from the owner? Otherwise as you said where has the money gone from those sales? Maybe it's all gone into the training ground and new stadium plans I'm not sure.

Some things just don't add up and we don't get told the thinking behind what's really going on at the club. Because for the life of me I can't understand why we've been so close to having a team that could be capable of mounting a challenge for the top 3 at least, and have needed a couple of players in the same areas for a few years now and haven't strengthened those positions.

Either way we will get a good idea of the club's intentions in how we conduct our business this summer.
 

bigpalacios

Well-Known Member
Jun 7, 2009
2,769
6,980
My thoughts on the game are that we were shit and didnt play like a team that had a champions league spot to play for.

We need to be busting a fucking gut in every game now but we seem to be doing this at the end of every season. Credit to the players for getting the point but we needed 3 points yesterday.
 

ItsBoris

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2011
7,970
9,414
Hate to trot out the ol' cliche, but we are a work in progress - at least i bloody hope so.

This is AVB's first season with us, and first full season in the prem. You can clearly see the team playing as a unit, particularly on the pressing and defensive front, but this has come at a cost of losing some attacking verve. We saw glimpses throughout the season, but not enough imo.

I may only notice this with our team for obvious reasons, but how many times do you see our defenders with their hands down by their waist, urging someone to come for the ball? I see Walker and Daws do it every game. Im not sure what to read into this, but for me it suggests that the team is not quite on the same wavelength. And why should it after a new midfield, and new tactics. Next season, i expect the flair and fluency to return.

Yeah, though this makes it even more baffling to me that Carroll doesn't start more often because Carroll does exactly that. He may not be the finished product yet, but Carroll is so much closer to the type of player that AVB's system requires than nearly anyone else we have in midfield. Parker is exactly what isn't needed.

To fulfil this though, AVB will need to be backed, but as every window passes, the realisation that we simply don't have the money we think we have grows stronger. The good thing is that we have some promising youngsters in the squad and on loan, so im hoping this promising bunch will be utilised pre season, and all of our focus can be on some shiny attackers.

I think you'd be surprised if you saw our cash flow statement. We've brought in a lot of money in the last 2 years without spending it, I'm certain of that.
 

onthetwo

Well-Known Member
May 19, 2006
4,583
3,407
I don't Levy is a risk-taker by nature. Even getting VDV didn't really cost us much and I think Bentley and Rebrov have scarred him in the transfer market. And even Dembele, who cost a large amount of cash was probably only possible due to the Modric money.
Will be an interesting summer one way or the other.
 

nugsie

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
291
791
Yes we should have beaten Wigan on paper without doubt, and I'm pissed we didn't.

However, 24hrs later and the result has to viewd as a point gained given the timing of our equaliser rather than two dropped.

At the start of the year all I wanted was for spurs to be in the mixer for UCL places come this time in the season given the changes in staff and players. I'm really happy with where spurs are and have great faith in AVB as manager.

My singular gripe comes not from transfers or more to the point a striker, but the players we let out on loan. Rose and townsend would have earned us collectively in one way or another at least up to 3 extra points all things considered I reckon....
 

elDiablo

SC Supporter
Feb 2, 2005
4,579
2,950
I think you'd be surprised if you saw our cash flow statement. We've brought in a lot of money in the last 2 years without spending it, I'm certain of that.

Just had a look at the Income and Cash Flow statements for 2011 and 2012 (ending June 2012).

We made and after tax profit of 669k in the year ending June 2011. Then made an after tax loss of -4.3mn in 2012.

Looking at our CF, in 2011 we had a net cash flow of +20.7mn, which was reduced to 15.7mn as at June 2012.

This year will include the sale of Modders, and the purchase of Dembele, Deuce, plus whatever we paid upfront for Ade ( i assume siggy and verts were included in 2012, but could be wrong).

I still dont think that's alot of cash. It seems the cash we made from operations in the previous two years was ploughed into the new training facility and the NDP fund.
 

cwhite02

SC Supporter
Sep 28, 2004
1,183
475
Wigan was never going to be easy. They've picked up a bit of performances and are always dangerous this time of the year. They weren't going to lie down for us. It's not over, I feel grounded over the rest of the season, the chelski game is massive, what a time to get our first win for donkey's years.
 

ziggy

Well-Known Member
Dec 23, 2003
4,453
3,095
Nothing extra to add other than I get pissed off when commentators say that 1st goal was lucky. If Bale was running away from the keeper and it hit him and went in, that would be lucky but he wasn't, he was closing down their keeper because he could see what may happen. That's not luck, it's deliberate.
 

ItsBoris

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2011
7,970
9,414
Just had a look at the Income and Cash Flow statements for 2011 and 2012 (ending June 2012).

We made and after tax profit of 669k in the year ending June 2011. Then made an after tax loss of -4.3mn in 2012.

Looking at our CF, in 2011 we had a net cash flow of +20.7mn, which was reduced to 15.7mn as at June 2012.

This year will include the sale of Modders, and the purchase of Dembele, Deuce, plus whatever we paid upfront for Ade ( i assume siggy and verts were included in 2012, but could be wrong).

I still dont think that's alot of cash. It seems the cash we made from operations in the previous two years was ploughed into the new training facility and the NDP fund.

The profit and loss accounts don't really tell you what's going on at the club financially, because of amortization. It skews the number to make it look like our profit is not as high, the cash flow is what tells us the true difference between what's going in and whats coming out. Also this year's net cash flow will be higher than 2012 and 2011, because of the selling we did in summer and the extra income we made from Europa league games (matchday and TV income). Remember the money we made selling Modric and VDV won't show up on the 2012 cash flow statement.
 

noahrobert

Active Member
Jan 27, 2011
521
403
I don't Levy is a risk-taker by nature. Even getting VDV didn't really cost us much and I think Bentley and Rebrov have scarred him in the transfer market. And even Dembele, who cost a large amount of cash was probably only possible due to the Modric money.
Will be an interesting summer one way or the other.

Rebrov wasn't Levy, he was brought by Graham and I think must be Sugar, Enic era started with Hoddle replacing Graham, so Rebrov must pre date Levy... Postiga however...
 
Top