- Jul 5, 2016
- 9,401
- 23,735
Close but no cigar.
It was Stokes and Morgan that did not keep up with the run rate not Ali, thats were the 14 runs were lost.
The batsman cant score 4 runs off a wide ball...if he hits it then it's not a wide. I get @Spurslove point about this, even though it's small in the grand scheme of things. If it's a wide down the legside then it's one run, if there is a run taken by the batsmen (say the keeper fumbles it) then it's "2 wides", if goes to the boundary then it's "5 wides". It would seem logical to record it on the screen as "1 WD" in my view.
Theres some wanker there in a Liverpool shirt.
****
amusing result given the recent bilateral series where england completed a whitewash ..... yet when things really mattered and the heat was on, we choked! England can be a little "spursy" at times
I've just had a cheeky tenner on them to win it, purely on the back of the last couple of games + because I don't think England will do it, not because we're not good enough but well, you know. Cricket's version of SpursCome on the Windies!
I've spunked a tenner if this is how they are going to carry on.Good batting recovery by Oz, but 24 wides, Windies? Come on guys! That could well be the difference between winning and losing.
I was only keeping up with the score rather then watching at the end, so why did the last pair wait until a victory was mathematically impossible before having a bash? Was the bowling that good?