- Mar 7, 2005
- 9,018
- 6,900
Very harsh on Kranjcar there Sloth. He's no slower and slightly more agile than Huddelstone for example, but I wouldn't really want him in cm either. He isn't very slow though. He's not Lennon or Bale quick, but he's not Corluka or Hudd slow either. I do think that in the right set up, he could play either side of the attacking three in our new 433 formation (he is actually pretty two footed, more so than VDV) and I also reckon he could play the VDV role in a 4411 and centrally in the attacking 3 of a 4231.
I personally would love to see him given 30 minutes for a tiring Adebayor in a game too, because I think he is reasonably strong on the ball, has good vision and passing and is a very decent finisher. Qualities a false No.9 needs.
I also think his tackling is OK for a player of his type. In 2009-10 for example when he stood in for Modric and Lennon he made nearly twice as many tackles as Modric and Lennon in similar time spans.
I think he's much slower and much weaker in the tackle than Huddlestone. I think he's as slow if not slower than Corluka. I place him in the Peter Crouch category slowness.
Tackling wise he has no craft whatsoever, he tends to square up and stick a leg out, but if he's by-passed he simply gives up, probably because he's so slow :wink: Basically he's a bit of a passenger when we don't have the ball, more of a passenger than, say, Huddlestone is.
For a tall guy he's useless in the air and a bit of a pussy, jumping with his shoulders and not his head (probably with his eye's closed most of the time, though that's just my prejudice obviously Has he ever scored a goal with his head?).
All of that said, there are a few positions for a player of his type in a side of our quality, it's more that I've seen people trying to slot him into totally inappropriate roles in incorrect formations in this thread.