- Jun 27, 2006
- 5,948
- 13,480
Is VAR for clear and obvious errors still? 4 minutes is not in any way clear and obvious...
Clear and obvious is currently only for non-offside calls. In the current laws of the game, you're either onside or offside, hence why they're drawing lines on the millimeter.Is VAR for clear and obvious errors still? 4 minutes is not in any way clear and obvious...
Thread basically says UEFA used two systems to find that Kane was offside, Hawkeye(back up system) and their new one, to determine Kane was in front of defender and then Hawk eye to determine he was in front of Ball
I have seen today’s “foul” for the penalty from 4 angles, numerous times each, and I can’t see a single point of contact on any part of the body.
Why was the referee not asked to view it on the monitor?
So maybe fans are part of the problem, that challenge shouldn’t lead to a penalty, its a nothing moment. Player going away from goal, gets a slight touch in by launching himself in-front of the defending player trying to clear his lines.That’s a foul, if it had been the other way around we would expect it to be given.
In fairness we got something very similar in Anfield on Lamela.That’s a foul, if it had been the other way around we would expect it to be given.
Not really, 1) there was clearly contact on Lamela, 2) Lamela was between VVD and the ball.In fairness we got something very similar in Anfield on Lamela.
Who’s jumping in to who to create that contact. Ridiculous decision.Watch closely on the knee. Pretty clear contact.
and the ref/VAR wouldn't have given us the pen. Fact.That’s a foul, if it had been the other way around we would expect it to be given.