I think it will be either SWP or Lennon, they just seem to similar to me to. Having them both would mean we'd have a huge amount of capital tied up in essentially the same player.
SWP is the more complete player too. He's fast, a good ball carrier, can cross and shoot. He also seems to have a good head on his shoulders. He's major downside is his size, but we can afford a couple of short-arses I suppose.
In summary then, if SWP then no Lennon with DL cashing in and making a small profit on the deal.
I've seen very little of Sneijder, so I'm entirely reliant on those who actually watch the Eredivisie. And from what I've read, if we sign him (whch remains a very big 'if'), and if we continue with a 4-4-2, a Jenas-Sneijder CM seems a strong possibility, or at least a stronger one than a Sneijder-Zokora combination. (Awaits howls of protest/outrage from the DZFC).
And who doe Taraabt replace in your line up... Not Schneider!
I don't have a problem with your maths at all. And I don't particularly want Lennon to go either, but I just have a feeling that Jol thinks he may be a bit of a cocky twat, and doesn't necessarily want a bad apple floating around the dressing room under minding his authority. This is complete conjecture, but I noticed Lennon's negative body language at times last season, forinstance one occassion I remember him getting arsy with Berbatov.
If I'm wrong and he wants SWP and lennon, it could be that he's earmarked Lennon for a slightly different roll, as this is something else that Jol has hinted at previously, with maybe Bent (unfortunately) coming in maybe Defoe leaving, perhaps Jol fancies Lennon playing in the hole or as a keane back up ??
What do you think ?
I half agree with you Joey.
(Disagree) Lennon CAN pass.
(Agree) But CANNOT strike a ball to cross or shoot.
SWP can do both and everything else that Lennon can do.
I get the same impression about the Jol/Lennon relationship as you, but it is largelly fueled by ITK stuff, which is usually bullshit. But, there is something about Lennon that just makes me think he'd be a bit of a shit to manage. As for the different role I think it is a possibility. As you say Jol definitley hinted he could play in the hole. However, at the moment I'd personally see it as a waste of time, as his striking of the ball and passing aren't upto it. To play in the hole you need to be able to pick a pass for the strikers or at least have a decent shot on you.
I think all in all Lennon is a difficult player to know what to do with. He has undoubted ability, but at the same time is plain shit in important areas of his game. He is fantastic (probably the best in the world) at beating players and getting to the line to pull the ball back. This will mean he will always create goals and his assist recored will be top notch. But, for long periods of games, his is next to useless. To be honest i think he'd get as many assists each season if he came of for 25 minutes at the end of the game, rather than started each game. When he comes on as a sub his pace is even more of a weapon as he is playing tired defenders. At the moment I don't see him as a 90 minute footballer, but as an impact sub. As a sub I think he could arguably be one of the best in the world. He is worth a place on the bench at every single club side in the world and very few players can say that. He is a tired fullbacks worst nightmare.